Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS: RRY020 Radio and Microwave Engineering Sp1, 08/09

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-20 - 2008-10-31
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Arto Heikkilä»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 33%
Around 20 hours/week»5 55%
Around 25 hours/week»1 11%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

- includes labs, reports, homeworks averaged over the weeks» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 11%
50%»2 22%
75%»4 44%
100%»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- overlapped» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 55%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 33%
No, the goals are set too high»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- a bit more getting "up to speed" for people with non-EE background would be nice to be added to the goals (the teachers do this quite well - though fast paced - in my opinion)» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- Reasonable for bakcground and number of credits, but it requires effort to digest such amount of theory in such a tight schedule. But it is changelling and ok.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»1 11%
To some extent»2 22%
Yes, definitely»3 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- all important topics were touched on during the exam, so it was an appropriate exam for the course» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»2 22%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- tutorials, labs, homeworks, help from teachers were more help than the lectures themselves (fast paced!)» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»4 44%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- very good book!» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 55%
Very well»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»1 11%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»8 88%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»2 22%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 44%
Very well»3 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 33%
High»3 33%
Too high»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Not because of the assigments. They were appropiated. But hours were needed to understand all the theory explained during the lessons.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 44%
High»3 33%
Too high»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- if you"re full time studying the workload is fine, however, students that also have to work next to uni and/or might get stuck with unreliable lab / report partners will find the load rather high i think» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»2 22%
Fair»1 11%
Adequate»3 33%
Good»1 11%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I don"t have much personal interest in microwave engineering at such a fundamental level, but I enjoyed the course nonetheless, it gives a very nice idea of the broad field» (Excellent)
- Although I expected a bit more about the lab. Too little time to undestand the devices used for microwaves design testing.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- homework, tutorial quality, labs»
- Exercices lectures and home assigments.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- course content was toooooo high»
- maybe include a crash course electrical engineering (short handout), what is impedance, susceptance, quick summary of circuit theory?»
- Maybe a missed an assigments exclusively oriented to waveguides.»

16. Additional comments

- It was difficult to learn everything in the course and the workload was too high. Though I don´,t know which parts should be preserved or which should be changed. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från