Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Applied computational electromagnetics, EEK221, MPEPO, HT2008, EEK221

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-11-06 - 2010-02-04
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 70%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 5%
Around 20 hours/week»2 11%
Around 25 hours/week»3 16%
Around 30 hours/week»10 55%
At least 35 hours/week»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- But ok, because each assignment gives marks.» (Around 30 hours/week)
- Not during the first three weeks. But when computer exercises started I spent more time, around 30h/week.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 16%
100%»15 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»18 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

18 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»18 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 6%
Yes, definitely»11 68%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- no exam but projects, assignments and seminars do access i have reached the goals» (?)
- There is no written exam is this course. But the grading seemed tougher than writing exam» (?)
- The final projects had kind of different degree of difficulty as i seemed, some could maybe be a bit more challanging when it comes to set up in Comsol to utilize the softwere in a larger extent. But the assignments were balanced.» (To some extent)
- There was no exam but it made us to learn lots more than having exam.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»7 38%
Great extent»11 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- The teacher has been really available !» (Great extent)
- Yuriy did not only impart the knowlege to us but has motivated us in numerous ways to learn how to apply the software» (Great extent)
- The lectures and exercises were very good.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»3 16%
Some extent»5 27%
Large extent»5 27%
Great extent»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Perhaps some, for the course, interesting chapters from Comsol help should be offered to buy in printing. I did not read any of the recommended course literature, except in the books I already possessed, which was the book in electromagnetic fied theory, Cheng.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 5%
Very well»17 94%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- Excellent» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 5%
Very good»17 94%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- this is exceptionally very good with yuriy» (Very good)
- Thanks Yuriy very much for his helps» (Very good)
- If attending to questions is to be graded than Yuriy got it 100%. We asked questions even on weekends and odd times and he never complains» (Very good)
- Mr. Yuri made himself available for us, students even during weekends to guide us with our rojects and assignments. He was the best and most helpful lecturer we came across.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»3 16%
Very well»14 77%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- We relate very well even if we are opponents.» (Very well)
- The course needed lots of interaction in terms of project works and presentation.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 50%
High»9 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- But it could be distributed in a better way. Perhaps the introduction to the software could start the first day in parallel to the background theory. Then when been introduced to the first set of electrical problems during the say first two weeks, the students have time to get familiar with the problems and can ask relevant questions sooner. It will probably be more effective time spent. Rather than doing almost nothing for three weeks and then do the most important work in a few days. Also it might be a good idea to not ask for more than one task at a time from the students, since they might be engaged in other courses that also have important tasks to be done in the same time. This happened in this course for the third assignment and the mini seminar group work. Also with a better distribution of the work load maybe the final project work can be a bit more challanging and be distributed some days earlier to make deeper study possible.» (Adequate)
- But it felt good after we have done it.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 22%
High»10 55%
Too high»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Sustainable Power Production course was too much esp.assignments» (High)
- It was very unevenly distributed, low in the beginning, and too high in the end.» (High)
- Too high but not due to this course. The amount of work was ok for this course» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»6 33%
Excellent»12 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- Interesting and fun to work with simulations. The workload can be betterly distributed. » (Good)
- I have enjoyed it alot» (Excellent)
- This is due to the teacher Yuriy. He was patient with many questions, always willing to assist and did not only mastered the software but also has fashion for it.» (Excellent)
- Learnt a lot. And enjoyed learning it.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The comparison with "real life", the thermal exercices and assignment was really nice due to this comparison.»
- all»
- every thing»
- Everything»
- The examination form is nice. Assignments during the study period, a group work, and a final project work. No written exam! good!»
- Everything should be reserved»
- The course outline and the teacher who was very good.»
- Assignments and Project work»
- Everything»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lecture in the room MT12. Too much noisy and the number of computers wasn"t enough.»
- I think I already mentioned it in the comments above.»
- The grade for the project review should be reduced since I think 20% is too much, we should increase the points for the assignments»
- I think that the project should deal with more difficult problems and be handed out earlier. »
- Nothing»

16. Additional comments

- I think it would be better if the first four lectures are compressed in only two lectures the first week, to be able to start with the computer excercises already in study week 2. That would give more time for the seminar and the project work later on during the course. Study weeks 5, 6 and 7 were very stressful. »
- Very interesting course»
- nope.»
- thank you Yuriy. The course was hard but you made it lively»
- It is a good course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från