Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Digital Integrated Circuit Design, HT2008, MCC090
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-10-16 - 2008-11-01 Antal svar: 50 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 80% Kontaktperson: Lena Peterson» Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your background1. My study background is:50 svarande
Chalmers civilingenjör programme - Electrical Engineering» | | 6 | | 12% |
Chalmers civilingenjör programme - Computer Engineering» | | 3 | | 6% |
Chalmers civilingenjör - other programme (explain below)» | | 3 | | 6% |
Chalmers högskoleingenjör programme - Electrical Engineering» | | 0 | | 0% |
Chalmers högskoleingenjör programme - Computer Engineering» | | 0 | | 0% |
Chalmers högskoleingenjör - other programme (explain below)» | | 0 | | 0% |
Other Swedish civilingenjör programme (explain below)» | | 0 | | 0% |
Other Swedish högskoleingenjör programme (explain below)» | | 0 | | 0% |
Foreign university - Electrical Engineering» | | 27 | | 54% |
Foreign university - Computer Engineering» | | 5 | | 10% |
Foreign university - other programme (explain below)» | | 5 | | 10% |
Other (explain below)» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 7.62 - Automation and mechatronics» (Chalmers civilingenjör - other programme (explain below))
- Z» (Chalmers civilingenjör - other programme (explain below))
- Automation och mekatronik» (Chalmers civilingenjör - other programme (explain below))
- electronic engineering» (Foreign university - other programme (explain below))
- Mechatronics» (Foreign university - other programme (explain below))
- Communication Engineering» (Foreign university - other programme (explain below))
- Electronic Engineering» (Foreign university - other programme (explain below))
- Foreign University- electronics engineering» (Foreign university - other programme (explain below))
- PhD Student in Computer Architecture» (Other (explain below))
2. I am currently enrolled in this master programme:50 svarande
Integrated Electronic System Design» | | 39 | | 78% |
Communication Engineering» | | 5 | | 10% |
Microtechnology» | | 3 | | 6% |
Biomedical Engineering» | | 0 | | 0% |
Other master programme» | | 1 | | 2% |
Not enrolled in master programme» | | 2 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5
Your own effort3. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.50 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 8 | | 16% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 16 | | 32% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 11 | | 22% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 8 | | 16% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 7 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - The hours were less during the first few weeks but increased during the last weeks» (Around 20 hours/week)
4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 50 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 2% |
50%» | | 6 | | 12% |
75%» | | 15 | | 30% |
100%» | | 28 | | 56% |
Genomsnitt: 4.4 - mayor collissions with other course» (50%)
- hurt my foot then absent some courses» (75%)
- I overslept, that"s all!» (75%)
- I missed one lecture» (100%)
5. How many other courses did you take this period?50 svarande
0» | | 3 | | 6% |
1» | | 38 | | 76% |
2» | | 7 | | 14% |
Other (explain below)» | | 2 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 2.16 - DAT091» (1)
- 3» (Other (explain below))
- 3» (Other (explain below))
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.6. How understandable are the course goals?50 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 7 | | 14% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 12 | | 24% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 31 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 3.34 - The course represents the bottom up approach well but there could be focus on the bottom (ie: device, transistors)» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
7. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.45 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 2% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 43 | | 95% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - This is a master"s level course in electronics engineering. and all the people taking this course should know what a transistor is at least ! I can understand that this is just an introduction course that is only 7 weeks long but if people in an electronics master program do not know what a transistor, inverter, etc is there must be something wrong. » (No, the goals are set too low)
8. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?46 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 10 | | 21% |
Yes, definitely» | | 14 | | 30% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 22 | | 47% |
Genomsnitt: 3.26 - yet we have to take an exam. But assignments were good» (?)
Teaching and course administration9. To what extent has the teaching (including lectures, tutorials, home assignments and labs) been of help for your learning?49 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 10% |
Large extent» | | 30 | | 61% |
Great extent» | | 14 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - The home assignments were very helpful in putting things in the perspective» (Large extent)
10. To what extent have the lectures been of help for you learning?48 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 12 | | 25% |
Large extent» | | 24 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 12 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 11. To what extent have the tutorials been of help for your learning?47 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 2% |
Some extent» | | 13 | | 27% |
Large extent» | | 26 | | 55% |
Great extent» | | 7 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.82 - What tutorials?» (?)
- There should be some PhD student for tutorials.» (Some extent)
- The tutorials for the lab were very detailed in contrast to the IESD course» (Great extent)
12. To what extent did the home assignments help your learning?50 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 12% |
Large extent» | | 30 | | 60% |
Great extent» | | 14 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - I couldn"t do them all due to putting a lot of time on the other course and some other issues.» (Some extent)
- Very good assignments.» (Great extent)
13. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the six home assignments?Matrisfråga# 1 Comparator logic design 50 svarande
Very easy» | | 4 | | 8% |
Somewhat easy» | | 11 | | 22% |
Reasonable» | | 24 | | 48% |
Somewhat hard» | | 10 | | 20% |
Very hard» | | 1 | | 2% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.86 # 2 The MOSFET 49 svarande
Very easy» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat easy» | | 7 | | 14% |
Reasonable» | | 21 | | 42% |
Somewhat hard» | | 13 | | 26% |
Very hard» | | 6 | | 12% |
Don"t know» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 3.38 # 3 MOSFET cap & comparator layout 49 svarande
Very easy» | | 3 | | 6% |
Somewhat easy» | | 14 | | 28% |
Reasonable» | | 21 | | 42% |
Somewhat hard» | | 10 | | 20% |
Very hard» | | 1 | | 2% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 # 4 CMOS inverter speed & logical effort 50 svarande
Very easy» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat easy» | | 2 | | 4% |
Reasonable» | | 20 | | 40% |
Somewhat hard» | | 21 | | 42% |
Very hard» | | 5 | | 10% |
Don"t know» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 # 5 Clock drivers 49 svarande
Very easy» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat easy» | | 1 | | 2% |
Reasonable» | | 8 | | 16% |
Somewhat hard» | | 24 | | 48% |
Very hard» | | 12 | | 24% |
Don"t know» | | 3 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 4.1 # 6 Carry look ahead designs 50 svarande
Very easy» | | 2 | | 4% |
Somewhat easy» | | 2 | | 4% |
Reasonable» | | 20 | | 40% |
Somewhat hard» | | 12 | | 24% |
Very hard» | | 6 | | 12% |
Don"t know» | | 8 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.84 14. How do you rate the time the six assignment took you to complete?Matrisfråga# 1 Comparator logic design 49 svarande
Very short» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat short» | | 11 | | 22% |
Reasonable» | | 22 | | 44% |
Somewhat long» | | 7 | | 14% |
Very long» | | 8 | | 16% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 # 2 The MOSFET 48 svarande
Very short» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat short» | | 1 | | 2% |
Reasonable» | | 15 | | 31% |
Somewhat long» | | 16 | | 33% |
Very long» | | 15 | | 31% |
Don"t know» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 4 # 3 MOSFET cap & comparator layout 48 svarande
Very short» | | 2 | | 4% |
Somewhat short» | | 6 | | 12% |
Reasonable» | | 26 | | 54% |
Somewhat long» | | 9 | | 18% |
Very long» | | 5 | | 10% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 # 4 CMOS inverter speed & logical effort 49 svarande
Very short» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat short» | | 1 | | 2% |
Reasonable» | | 16 | | 32% |
Somewhat long» | | 19 | | 38% |
Very long» | | 11 | | 22% |
Don"t know» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 # 5 Clock drivers 48 svarande
Very short» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat short» | | 0 | | 0% |
Reasonable» | | 19 | | 39% |
Somewhat long» | | 15 | | 31% |
Very long» | | 11 | | 22% |
Don"t know» | | 2 | | 4% |
Genomsnitt: 3.85 # 6 Carry look ahead designs 49 svarande
Very short» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat short» | | 4 | | 8% |
Reasonable» | | 20 | | 40% |
Somewhat long» | | 10 | | 20% |
Very long» | | 6 | | 12% |
Don"t know» | | 8 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.81 15. To what extent did the labs help your learning?50 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 6% |
Some extent» | | 15 | | 30% |
Large extent» | | 23 | | 46% |
Great extent» | | 9 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 2.76 - The labs were very easy and introductory, at least there should some specifications on speed, layout size...» (Small extent)
- I think the labs were good for being an introduction to cadence, I don"t think I took the time to refelect and acctually learn the lessons in the last pages of each lab.» (Some extent)
- Rather easy to pass though.» (Some extent)
- Thanks Lena» (Great extent)
- There should be more stuff to be done on Cadence» (Great extent)
16. How do you rate the level of difficulty of the four labs?Matrisfråga- Lab 1-2-3 are in fact different parts of a complete design and I think (my belief) they should be together to be called a single "lab".»
Lab 0 Inverter and Cadence intro 50 svarande
Very easy» | | 11 | | 22% |
Somewhat easy» | | 14 | | 28% |
Reasonable» | | 23 | | 46% |
Somewhat hard» | | 2 | | 4% |
Very hard» | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.32 Lab 1 Comparator schematics 50 svarande
Very easy» | | 4 | | 8% |
Somewhat easy» | | 17 | | 34% |
Reasonable» | | 27 | | 54% |
Somewhat hard» | | 2 | | 4% |
Very hard» | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.54 Lab 2 Comparator layout and DRC 50 svarande
Very easy» | | 2 | | 4% |
Somewhat easy» | | 9 | | 18% |
Reasonable» | | 26 | | 52% |
Somewhat hard» | | 12 | | 24% |
Very hard» | | 1 | | 2% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.02 Lab 3 Comparator post-layout simulation and verification 50 svarande
Very easy» | | 3 | | 6% |
Somewhat easy» | | 12 | | 24% |
Reasonable» | | 29 | | 58% |
Somewhat hard» | | 4 | | 8% |
Very hard» | | 1 | | 2% |
Don"t know» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 2.82 17. How do you rate the time the in-lab part of the four labs took you?Note that lab 0 nominally is 2 hours long, whereas labs 1-3 are each nominally 4 hours long.Matrisfråga Lab 0 Inverter and Cadence intro 50 svarande
Very short» | | 3 | | 6% |
Somewhat short» | | 9 | | 18% |
Reasonable» | | 38 | | 76% |
Somewhat long» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very long» | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.7 Lab 1 Comparator schematics 50 svarande
Very short» | | 2 | | 4% |
Somewhat short» | | 6 | | 12% |
Reasonable» | | 41 | | 82% |
Somewhat long» | | 1 | | 2% |
Very long» | | 0 | | 0% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.82 Lab 2 Comparator layout and DRC 50 svarande
Very short» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat short» | | 2 | | 4% |
Reasonable» | | 30 | | 60% |
Somewhat long» | | 13 | | 26% |
Very long» | | 4 | | 8% |
Don"t know» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.34 Lab 3 Comparator post-layout simulation and verification 50 svarande
Very short» | | 1 | | 2% |
Somewhat short» | | 3 | | 6% |
Reasonable» | | 39 | | 78% |
Somewhat long» | | 3 | | 6% |
Very long» | | 3 | | 6% |
Don"t know» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 18. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?50 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 4% |
Some extent» | | 13 | | 26% |
Large extent» | | 28 | | 56% |
Great extent» | | 7 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - We need compendium in English» (Small extent)
- I used the swedish book that Kjell wrote for the swedish equivalent cource.» (Some extent)
- Jeppsons kompendium» (Large extent)
- I believe that the text book by Raebaey was a more extensive coverage of the topic compared to Weste and Harris.» (Large extent)
- the only part which was need more time to spend is dynamic circuits» (Great extent)
19. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?49 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 2% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 25 | | 51% |
Very well» | | 23 | | 46% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - Before I have used WebCT and Sakai. Chalmers Student Portal was fine. The documentations supplied and the use of online resources was good. However I can not understand Swedish yet, and there were some lectures in which Swedish was most used than English.» (Very badly)
- plz change the swedish in handouts to english» (Rather well)
Study climate20. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?49 svarande
Very poor» | | 1 | | 2% |
Rather poor» | | 2 | | 4% |
Rather good» | | 16 | | 32% |
Very good» | | 26 | | 53% |
I did not seek help» | | 4 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - i must appriciate professor"s efforts to clear any problems which i faced during lecs.» (Very good)
- During the labs Lena was very helpful and solved most hickups with Cadence. Kjell was good during exam week where you could meet and ask questions. Also got fast response by email.» (Very good)
- But no question was un-answered.» (I did not seek help)
21. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?49 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 4 | | 8% |
Rather well» | | 21 | | 42% |
Very well» | | 23 | | 46% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 2% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - Aside from the labs, I was all alone in this one!» (I did not seek cooperation)
22. How was the course workload?49 svarande
Too low» | | 1 | | 2% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 28 | | 57% |
High» | | 15 | | 30% |
Too high» | | 5 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 - You need to cooperate more with the other course because together they became too much! If it had been together with a course with little workload it would have worked well.» (Too high)
23. How was the total workload this study period?48 svarande
Too low» | | 1 | | 2% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 15 | | 31% |
High» | | 18 | | 37% |
Too high» | | 14 | | 29% |
Genomsnitt: 3.91 - The other cource introduction to electonic system design was a very heavy lab-cource that took time away from this cource.» (Too high)
- Due to VHDL, i was unable to study this course» (Too high)
Summarizing questions24. What is your general impression of the course?48 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 2% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 12% |
Good» | | 27 | | 56% |
Excellent» | | 14 | | 29% |
Genomsnitt: 4.12 - There are too heavy home assignments. And the last ones that come during a time when the other course is already heavy as hell we got the most heavy home assignments. With labs from both courses together with the home assignments we got 16 assignments totally!» (?)
- focus more on explaining the hand ins before deadline (however, not by giving the exact solution *hint*), and not explain what we have done wrong» (Adequate)
- I"d give it very good but there"s no such field here. Excellent would be an exaggeration.» (Good)
- I"ve learned a lot.» (Good)
- i liked the course alot as it helped me to clear many previous concepts apart from the new ones.» (Excellent)
- very good course!» (Excellent)
25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The home assignments»
- the lectures and home assignments were very good I think!»
- Home assignments are good.»
- Lab and Home Assignment »
- course structure,lab structure,assignments»
- english version of Kompendium!»
- The labs. They are very good»
- labs,homeassign.»
- Teachers (Kjell and Lena), Cadence and assignments»
- Labs»
- Assignments, which capture the things we need to learn and enhances our foundation. I especially appreciated Professor Kjell Jeppson "s emphasis on the concepts we had learned while interpreting the question rather than the actual numerical value.»
- simply everything.»
- Home assignment»
- Home assignments»
- the contents of the home assignment»
- The bottom-up focus is very successfully given.»
- The literature"s good, professor Kjell was a really good instructor, and all-in-all this course seems mature.»
- Before the lab sessions, it should be 1 or 2 lectures about cadence software and Unix OS.»
- Exercise slots and Labs»
- Lab work»
- The home assignments»
- the home assignments. It was easy to follow from assignment 1 to 6.»
- labs,assignments»
- labs and lectures»
- the teacher is very good. »
- Home Assignments.»
26. What should definitely be changed to next year?- May be the lab workload should be increase. We draw few cells (comparator only), with very detail guidance ==> good at 2 first labs, but boring then.»
- No»
- It seems that everythings went fast and I did not concentrated on subject. I think it is better to have much preparetion at begining of year. »
- number of labs should be more»
- better lectures that reflect more on homeassign. before the deadline. Maybe some exercise time where we can get help with solving the homeassignments.»
- There should be some project on layout»
- There must be trade off, if students have passed the labs and assignments than they should pass this course (should be awarded grade 3) but if some one wish to improve grade should attend the exam. Exam shouldn"t be compulsory to pass this course because students spend lot of time and efforts to solve assignments and labs after all of these efforts still we have sword of exam hanging on our neck. »
- Suggestions about reading materials , that introduce us to the research activities in the digital cmos design field.»
- some more lecs about sequential ckts must be included as every time we have to face clocks in real time systems.»
- not really»
- number of exercise hours should be increased in the lectures»
- there should be some thing like kompendium (for swedish student) for nonswedish students in english,because the price of book is too expensive.»
- the contents of the cadense lab»
- But there could be more focus on the details of the device.»
- Some assistance to proffessor would"ve been nice.»
- examination should contain at least 2 questions on CMOS design. I mean there wasn"t any question like Home assignment #1 which was very nice and challenging.»
- Home Assignments may be made little bit less time consuming.»
- Need more case studies.»
- The workload of the home assignments»
- labs and assignments should earn a passing garde.»
- if labs should be pass exams should be pass»
- more data and time for dynamic circuits»
27. Additional comments- It"s difficult to find reference book (CMOS VLSI design). Actually now I do not have that book for study! (And I know some others are same with me)»
- It is interesting course.»
- Thanks Kjell.»
- you should mix and match students from different programme and countries!! not as this year! it"s rather unfair!»
- Great cource. Good teaching and good labs. The handins helped me to learn a lot. But maybee skip the handin in week 7 and have a easy handin in week 1 instead. in week 7 you must be able to focus on the written exam and the other cource labs.»
- Overall this course is good. Thanks to Kjel and Lena»
- Vag Bra (Great) Professor!!!!!!»
- Great lectures!»
- plz analyze adders more in details»
- generally, it is a excellent course as well as the patient professor»
- I think it shows that you have thought about how to structure the cource. The intregration between the home assigments and the labs are great. Also that you use the same comparator and gradually make it better or "design" it, is a great idea. One of the better cources during my time on Chalmers.
KEEP IT IN THE CURRENT FORMAT»
- The course was very introductory and the labs were inadequate.»
- The lectures about Adder was not as good as another lectures. »
- At least I think we got a good starting point from VLSI.»
- this course was very usefull for me and i think i"ve got whatever i was supposed to get!»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|