Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Cognitive Ergonomics (lp2), MPP036

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-15 - 2009-01-25
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 63%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»2 16%
Around 30 hours/week»6 50%
At least 35 hours/week»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- The workload was quite concentrated to the later part of the period since the exercises to carry out throughout the course were undefined at the beginnign fo the course.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- Less in the beginning, more in the end.» (Around 30 hours/week)
- too much literature and heavy workload» (At least 35 hours/week)
- This course takes way to much time!» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 8%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 16%
100%»9 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.58

- många föreläsningar krockade med föreläsningar i kursen Visual brand identity som jag också gick.» (25%)
- As much as I could, colliding cources.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 66%
No, the goals are set too high»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- They seem reasonable, although the amount of workload was too much.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- lite för mycket som skulle göras.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»1 11%
To some extent»2 22%
Yes, definitely»4 44%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- But it was all too much» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 58%
Large extent»4 33%
Great extent»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- I believe all the lectures were not of a great help to do the assignments.» (Some extent)
- a lot of the learning was through doing and reading articles » (Some extent)
- There could have been more focus on the methods during the lectures and a greater interplay between the lecturers, as many of them spoke about the same basic knowledge, i.e. senses, modalities etc.» (Some extent)
- har ju inte varit på alla föreläsningarna.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»10 83%
Great extent»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- The amount of litrature was too much, they required a lot of time to read and be applied to our project.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 16%
Rather well»8 66%
Very well»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The assignments were handed out very late in the course, making it difficult to plan ahead and understand the course theme» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 33%
Very good»7 58%
I did not seek help»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 8%
Rather well»2 16%
Very well»9 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»1 8%
Too high»11 91%

Genomsnitt: 4.91

- I think we got the last assignments a little too late, there was not so much to do in the beginning, but much in the end.» (High)
- I would say the course could have more credits since it occupied most of the studying time in the week.» (Too high)
- I only had one course and i felt that there was alot to do, so i thin kthe workload was too high. » (Too high)
- THere were really a lot of things to do, the assignments were all too comprehensive» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»6 50%
Too high»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- My other course was perfectly fine, it was this course that made the study period very intense» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 8%
Adequate»3 25%
Good»8 66%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- Too much to do, and maybe not really the contents I had expected (I had expected less methods/theories and more reality based examples and studies)» (Adequate)
- I feel that I learned much during the coarse, but it was too much work.» (Good)
- Apart from the workload, the assignments really helped me to learn more about different methods and aspects of cognitive ergonomics.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- interesting course»
- Applying methods is worth keeping for next year.»
- The general idea of having a system to study and perform methods on.»
- Interviews and practicing methods. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- should be planned well as it is too much work compared to other advanced level courses»
- Focus on fewer things/assignments»
- The amount of litreature and work should definitely be reduced.»
- Basically there was too much. And i did not really know what the focus was...was it to learn methods and how to apply them , or the redesign. Because the workload was great I think it could be a good idea to concentrate on methods like in the physical ergonomics course. And perhaps the focus should just be a cognitive ergonomics evaluation of a product...not both an evaluation AND design. It was the evaluation of the products ergonomics i felt was most educational. The re-design could perhaps just be some ideas or recommendation of improvements rather than actually doing a conceptual design as this takes a lot of time. »
- Getting the assignments earlier so the work could be planned better in advance.»
- Alternating the people having the lecture is good when this provides specific expertise. Else, this alternation is only confusing and unprofessional. If possible, more combined course literature and less differing copies.»
- Hand out the assignments earlier and make them smaller»

16. Additional comments

- too many tasks and a lot of literature to read. the project definition can be more clear as there is no proper connection between the project tasks»
- It might be a good idea to help students for choosing their project in the begining of the term.»
- More feedback is needed, first after the initial presentation, then after the final one. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från