|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Visual brand identity and market analysis (lp2), MPP105Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-12-15 - 2009-01-25 Antal svar: 23 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60% Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.65 - I estemate that I have spent over 45 hours/week on this course, which is way too much. » (At least 35 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.82 - read it as an extra course» (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.47 - the goals are very fluid but the demands are specific, not a very good combination.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.04 - Even if we did not study this course on our school.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - As usual it is hard to show what you can in a group-project» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.26 - Very interesting lectures, but reading the lecturer"s articles as well was unnecessary.» (Large extent) 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.47 - A lot of the articles were either unintresting or repeating what the lecturers said. Warell"s article was the other way around though, his lecture didn"t teach that much, but the articles were good.» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - havn"t really used it» (?) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.69 - by mail» (Very good) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.43 - Due to the poor english of a fellow student in my group, the work was slowed down and, in some cases, impossible to carry out the way it was intended to.» (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.26 - Luckily, my other course had a small workload, so it worked out well in the end.» (High) 12. How was the total workload this study period?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.13 - The other course I took, Materials selection and design, was a very light 7.5 credit course.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.47 - An excellent course in its content, but one reason to why it is possible to learn so much is that the course is larger than its 7,5 credits.» (Good) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The project and the set-up with a large number of interesting guest lectures.»- the actual organization» - the group-project» - Föreläsarna» - guest lecturers» - All the lecturers» - The many good guest lecturers that come from different companies.» - almost everything» - Team project and presentation Lecture from outside of school,Volvo and SAAB» - more brands can be chosen, not only for the cars.» - the lecturers and the project» - The many "famous" lecturers.» - The guest speakers. They are very inspiring. » - I enjoy lecture from different teachers and people from different companise.We can choose the brand by ourself and cooperate with student from different country.I learn a lot from them：,) » - Karjalainen, Diaz de la Vega, Löfgren, Otto.» - Lecturars from outside school» - Almost everything!» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The personal reflective report. It is very good to reflect and write about what you read and hear. But it is too extensive. I don´,t see the reason why everyone should write a summary of papers and lectures. The report gets very big and it doesn´,t feel like the examiner is going to read everything. Better with a shorter report more focused on the personal thoughts. Maybe with pre-defined questions.»- to rent the car before, in two times in order to plan the work, and then if needed, to have the possibily to rent it again.» - less work load. the personal reflection is more than 20% of the course» - Att sitta och komentera och summerea alla artiklar och föreläsningar har känts väldigt onödigt och inte alls givande. Jag förslår ett litteratur seminarie tills nästa år.» - some of the litterature was a bit redundant» - Recommendations on which papers to read first so that the information from them can be used within the project. » - reduced workload for students» - Nothing.» - the heavy workload.» - Planning of supervision, focus this on the earlier part of the project.» - Try to not expect som much of the students. They are very good at putting pressure on them selves and don´,t always need to hear how well everybody performed last year, because it will make the students feel that they need to outdo that. » - some lectures and papers look similar.» - Broström"s, Warell"s and Hiort af Ornäs lectures could be skipped.» - A bigger variety of lecturars. Both male and female lecturars, and from different industries. Now it was mainly car companies and brands which was discussed.» - fler kvinnliga föreläsare hade varit intressant. Koppla ihop artiklarna mer med föreläsningarna.» - Some papers were not that interesting and I think that there were too many papers.» 16. Additional comments- interesstingn subject»- I think it was a really good and usable course.» - It was really good course.» - A very rewarding course if you have the time and energy that it requires. »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13%