Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Project AIDE 2 (lp1), PPU015
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-10-16 - 2008-10-31 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45% Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.5 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 40% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 40% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - varied depending on the amount of data we had to work on, initial weeks were more of analysis and last weeks were CAD modeling which took more than 30 hrs per week» (At most 15 hours/week)
- the workload was much more after the midpresentation» (Around 20 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 5 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 2 | | 40% |
100%» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 4.6 - expected more lectures» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 5 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 4 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.5 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 5 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 40% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 80% |
Large extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?3 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 100% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - there were no handouts in this course but only oral supervision» (?)
- there were no webdocuments for this course» (Rather well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 80% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?5 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 40% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 20% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - due to some students there is disturbance in the whole group.» (Rather poorly)
11. How was the course workload?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 100% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 12. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 20% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 4.6 - advanced Computer aided design was very hectic and the credits are too less for the amount of work we put in.» (Too high)
- the other course,CAID had enormous amount of workload,which seemed unnecessary and limited the time we wished to spend on AIDE project2.» (Too high)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?5 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 60% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 4.4 - by some more extra lectures,maybe by people from industry,could be much better» (Good)
- its good we are doing this AIDE project with collaboration of volvo cars. It is our first industry project and we expect more.» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the whole project»
- the supervision by someone from industry(volvo cars) was very good and made good inspiration»
- the supervisor from volvo is definitely useful and helpful for our work.»
- designer from car company.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the amount of lectures by the industry professionals should be at least 3 in the whole course.»
- maybe more supervision and contact to the person that comes from industry and maybe some more lectures»
- maybe more time we can do it much better.»
- more lecture from car designer.»
16. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|