Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Modern subatomic detection and analysis methods, FUF065

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-06-17 - 2008-07-17
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Ulf Gran»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 33%
Around 20 hours/week»2 66%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- Very varying» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- Just missed the first lecture because I wasn"t in sweden yet» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 33%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

2 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

2 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»2 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»2 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The course literature did not cover everything so it would have been good to have a recomended extra readings or internet link. Also to have recomended chapters for each part of the course to read.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

9. How relevant were the laboratory parts in the course?

3 svarande

Very relevant»3 100%
Quite relevant»0 0%
Less relevant»0 0%
Not relevant»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good laborations but I think they need to be followed up by a lecture where data is analysed and a discussion about the laboration» (Very relevant)

10. How relevant was the study trip?

3 svarande

Very relevant»2 66%
Quite relevant»1 33%
Less relevant»0 0%
Not relevant»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very interesting.» (Very relevant)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1.16

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»3 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»3 100%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- We had good discussions and learned a lot in that way.» (Very well)

13. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 33%
Adequate»2 66%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Very large area covered by this course so it was a bit hard to know what concentrate on during studying.» (Adequate)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 33%
Adequate»2 66%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The workload varied very much between the weeks» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- synd att labborationerna inte gick riktigt som det var tänkt, men jag antar att det inte kommer vara ett problem nästa år» (Excellent)
- A very interesting course. Nice lectures and laborations and a very good study trip.» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The study trip»
- (If possible) the study trip, laborations»
- Experimental work, GSI-trip»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Follow ups on the laborations. Before the exam maybe hand out some questions relevant for the course because it was hard to know what to expect of the exam and how to study to it.»
- It would be good to write a small report about the experiments because then it is much easier to remember everything and clearer to understand»

18. Additional comments

- Very nice to have an experimental subatomic course. Too bad not more students attended it!»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 1.16
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.05

Kursutvärderingssystem från