Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPRSS 2007/2008 –,, evaluation after Quarter 4, MPRSS
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-05-27 - 2008-06-12 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 85% Kontaktperson: Rüdiger Haas»
1. How did you get information about MPRSS?Did you get to know about our master"s programme by:6 svarande
Via internet and Chalmers webpages» | | 4 | | 66% |
Via Chalmers printed catalogue» | | 2 | | 33% |
Via Chalmers posters» | | 0 | | 0% |
Via university teachers at your home university» | | 0 | | 0% |
Via friends» | | 0 | | 0% |
Other (write comment)» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.33 - I would like to tick the four first options, but I can only tick one.» (Via Chalmers printed catalogue)
2. What do you think of the programme name "Radio and Space Science"?MatrisfrågaA good and attractive name! 6 svarande
yes» | | 4 | | 66% |
no» | | 2 | | 33% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.33 Difficult to understand the programme content 6 svarande
yes» | | 3 | | 50% |
no» | | 2 | | 33% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 1.66 Clearly "Astrophysics" is part of the programme. 6 svarande
yes» | | 4 | | 66% |
no» | | 2 | | 33% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.33 Cleary "Earth observations" is part of the programme! 6 svarande
yes» | | 1 | | 16% |
no» | | 4 | | 66% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2 Cleary "Technology" is part of the programme! 6 svarande
yes» | | 4 | | 66% |
no» | | 1 | | 16% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5 I have a better name for the programme (please comment). 5 svarande
yes» | | 0 | | 0% |
no» | | 4 | | 80% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 3. Which MPRSS-track do you follow?6 svarande
Astrophysics» | | 3 | | 50% |
Earth observations» | | 1 | | 16% |
Technology» | | 1 | | 16% |
none» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - But I am not satisfy with the program"s courses.» (Astrophysics)
4. Quarter-1: How was the workload in relation to the number of credit units (cu)?answer only for those courses that you participated in, otherwise klick "do not know - did not take the course"Matrisfråga RRY015 - Space science and techniques 6 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 2 | | 33% |
reasonable» | | 4 | | 66% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 RRY020 - Radio and microwave engineering 6 svarande
too high» | | 3 | | 50% |
high but O.K.» | | 2 | | 33% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 16% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.66 ESS135 - Computer introduction 6 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 16% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 5 | | 83% |
Genomsnitt: 5.5 5. Quarter-1: What is your overall impression of the course?answer only for those courses that you participated in, otherwise klick "do not know - did not take this course"Matrisfråga RRY015 - Space science and techniques 6 svarande
very good» | | 3 | | 50% |
good» | | 3 | | 50% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5 RRY020 - Radio and microwave engineering 6 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 1 | | 16% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 16% |
bad» | | 4 | | 66% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 ESS135 - Computer introduction 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 20% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.4 6. Quarter-2: How was the workload in relation to the number of credit units (cu)?answer only for those courses that you participated in, otherwise klick "do not know - did not take the course"Matrisfråga - The teachnig and materials of electromagnetics waves is really bad.»
RRY030 - Astrophysics and earth science 6 svarande
too high» | | 1 | | 16% |
high but O.K.» | | 3 | | 50% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 16% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 1 | | 16% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 RRY035 - Electromagnetic waves and spectroscopy 6 svarande
too high» | | 1 | | 16% |
high but O.K.» | | 3 | | 50% |
reasonable» | | 0 | | 0% |
low but O.K.» | | 1 | | 16% |
too low» | | 1 | | 16% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 7. Quarter-2: What is your overall impression of the course?answer only for those courses that you participated in, otherwise klick "do not know - did not take the course"Matrisfråga - The courses this quarter were too disorganised. No clear structure, too many different teachers, especially in Electromagnetic waves part. You shouldn"t take two courses and say it is one course. It doesn"t work.
My idea is to put the spectroscopy and astrophysics in the same course, as they are closely related, offer the students to choose between this and an extended earth science course, and skip the waves part completely - integrate it in the antenna courses instead. Why not put a course in radio telescopes here instead?»
RRY030 - Astrophysics and earth science 6 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 2 | | 33% |
neutral» | | 3 | | 50% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 1 | | 16% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 RRY035 - Electromagnetic waves and spectroscopy 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 2 | | 40% |
bad» | | 2 | | 40% |
very bad» | | 1 | | 20% |
do not know - did not take the course» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 8. Quarter-3: How was the workload in relation to the number of credit units (cu)?answer only for those courses that you participated in, otherwise klick "do not know - did not take this course"Matrisfråga RRY045 - Numerical methods 6 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 1 | | 16% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 16% |
low but O.K.» | | 1 | | 16% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 RRY040 - Interstellar medium and star formation 5 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 20% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.4 RRY070 - Remote sensing 5 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 20% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.4 RRY055 - MM and Submm (THz) receiver technology for instrumentation 5 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 20% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.4 EME101 - Active microwave circuits 5 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 20% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.4 ASF050 - Relativistic astrophysics 6 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 1 | | 16% |
reasonable» | | 2 | | 33% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 9. Quarter-3: What is your overall impression of the course?answer only for those courses that you participated in, otherwise klick "do not know - did not take this course"Matrisfråga - It would be good if the ASF050 is integrated in the Chalmers system. I also think that it would be great if this course come later in time than the course in gravitation and cosmology (the teacher also thought so). It is also strange that this course, which is quite hard, is only on C level.»
RRY045 - Numerical methods 6 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 3 | | 50% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4 RRY040 - Interstellar medium and star formation 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 20% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.4 RRY070 - Remote sensing 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 1 | | 20% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.2 RRY055 - MM and Submm (THz) receiver technology for instrumentation 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 1 | | 20% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.6 EME101 - Active microwave circuits 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 1 | | 20% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.6 ASF050 - Relativistic astrophysics 6 svarande
very good» | | 1 | | 16% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 2 | | 33% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 10. Quarter-4: How was the workload in relation to the number of credit units (cu)?answer only for those courses that you participated in, otherwise klick "do not know - did not take this course"Matrisfråga - Maybe the RRY050 should win on having hand-in problems instead of exam.»
RRY050 - Radioastronomical techniques and interferometry 6 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 2 | | 33% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 5 ASF060 - Stellar structure and evolution 5 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 0 | | 0% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 5 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 6 FIM490 - Astroparticle physics 6 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 2 | | 33% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 5 RRY065 - Applied remote sensing 5 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 1 | | 20% |
reasonable» | | 0 | | 0% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.2 SSY100 - Antenna engineering 5 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 1 | | 20% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.4 RRY060 - Atmospheric processes 5 svarande
too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
high but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
reasonable» | | 0 | | 0% |
low but O.K.» | | 0 | | 0% |
too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 5 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 6 11. Quarter-4: What is your overall impression of the course?answer only for those courses that you participated in, otherwise klick "do not know - did not take this course"Matrisfråga - As in the case of the Q2 courses, it is not good with three different courses in one course (RRY050). Couldn"t the geodesy part be integrated in a geodesy course?»
RRY050 - Radioastronomical techniques and interferometry 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 2 | | 40% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 4.4 ASF060 - Stellar structure and evolution 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 5 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 6 FIM490 - Astroparticle physics 6 svarande
very good» | | 2 | | 33% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 RRY065 - Applied remote sensing 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 1 | | 20% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.4 SSY100 - Antenna engineering 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 1 | | 20% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 5.2 RRY060 - Atmospheric processes 5 svarande
very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
good» | | 0 | | 0% |
neutral» | | 0 | | 0% |
bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
do not know - did not take this course» | | 5 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 6 12. Quarter-5: Which MPRSS-courses do you plan to follow?3 svarande
RRY080 - Radar systems and technology» | | 2 | | 66% |
RRY085 - Plasma physics with applications» | | 0 | | 0% |
RRY090 - Galaxies and obserational cosmology» | | 1 | | 33% |
RRY025 - Image processing» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.66 - None - I am going abroad.» (?)
- Non of them. » (?)
13. Quarter-6: Which MPRSS-courses do you plan to follow?4 svarande
RRY095 - Satellite positioning» | | 0 | | 0% |
RRY100 - Satellite communications» | | 0 | | 0% |
FAS010 - Astrophysical dynamics» | | 0 | | 0% |
TIF065 - Atomic, molecular and cluster physics» | | 0 | | 0% |
FFM071 - Gravitation and cosmology» | | 2 | | 50% |
EME106 - Foundations for microwave engineering» | | 1 | | 25% |
SSY095 - Image analysis» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 5.75 - None - I am going abroad.» (?)
- TIF065 and FFM071» (FFM071 - Gravitation and cosmology)
14. What was good with the first 4 quarters MPRSS?please comment- Some of the courses are really good and interesting. Most of the teachers have been very kind and helpful.»
- Astroparticle, Relativity, Space Science and Technique.»
- Space Sciences and Techniques courses was really good to study, well composed and with defined objectives»
15. What was bad with the first 4 quarters MPRSS?please comment- There are too many courses which are divided into smaller courses. If it had worked, I wouldn"t mind, but all of them have felt more or less disorganised depending on this. Although, the RRY045 and RRY050 were better organised than the Q2 courses.
Then there is much more to say about the courses in Q2, but I think most of that has been said in a letter from the students to Rüdiger.»
- The combined courses. Part of them suit my interest, but I have to give up since other parts in a course are not relavant to me.»
- Most of the courses were not have well defined objectives. Clearly learning motives of subjects were ambitious rather then theme well composed and focussed»
16. Is there anything that needs to be improved?please comment- There are some things that need to be done. The Q2 courses have to be reorganised, everyone that took them agree on that. It would also be good to revise the order of some of the courses, as well as checking the prerequisites for them (as I know of several classmates not having sufficient knowledge of quantum physics to follow the spectroscopy course, even less the astroparticle physics course). If you need quantum physics to follow this master"s programme, that should clearly be stated in the prerequisites. Or an introductory quantum physics course should be offered to those who need it.
Now it doesn"t affect me, as I am going abroad, but it would have been good with information about the elective courses for the autumn as we had for the courses this spring. I didn"t actively search for the last date for course choice as I wasn"t going to make a choice, but I think it would have been good if that information went out to everyone in the programme (either from the department or from the student centre).»
- I suggest that some courses in the fundamental could be elective in MPRSS program.»
- Actually the programme is so diverse that it cannot be a one Master Programme. The Tracks in programme should be isolated well from the start.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|