ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TEK250 - Industrial Management

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-05-26 - 2008-06-13
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 26%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Persson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 9 56%

Around 20 hours/week» 6 37%

Around 25 hours/week» 1 6%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- Jag är anmäld till denna kurs bara för att jag tyckte den verkade så intressant, vilket den oxå var.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- I don"t think I"m even close to 15 hours.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- probably around 5-10 actually. The other course I took (software architecture) required a lot of time.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%» 1 6%

25%» 1 6%

50%» 1 6%

75%» 9 56%

100%» 4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- Var bara på två eller tre föreläsningar tyvärr då det krockade med mina andra kurser» (0%)
- there were some classes on the same time as other classes I had to go to.» (75%)
- Only missed one or two lectures, and that was because of sickness.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 6 37%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 4 25%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 6 37%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Sorry.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 12 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I expected a bit more real world examples. Not only a quite known success stories. Some external from industries talking about their experience with setting up a product line would have been nice.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 1 7%

Yes, definitely» 6 46%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 5 31%

Large extent» 7 43%

Great extent» 4 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- De föreläsningar jag var på, var riktigt bra!» (Great extent)
- Outstanding lectures.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent» 2 12%

Some extent» 5 31%

Large extent» 8 50%

Great extent» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The course book is very boring and hard to read. Removing/changing the book should be considered.» (Small extent)
- Didn"t buy the book, but I have read the articles. They were boring but helpful and probably necessary.» (Some extent)
- Mostly the hand-outs not the book so much. A lot of spelling mistakes that should not be in a course book was a really minus.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly» 1 6%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 7 43%

Very well» 8 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- The lecture notes and other stuff were not usually available a couple of days after the lecture. (this is not LEAN :-)» (Very badly)
- It was a bit tricky to find some of the articles. But apart from that things have been smooth sailing.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 6%

Rather good» 4 25%

Very good» 6 37%

I did not seek help» 5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- No additional time expect the lecture to get help.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 6%

Rather well» 7 43%

Very well» 3 18%

I did not seek cooperation» 5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- There were no projects, hence no cooperation.» (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 2 12%

Adequate» 13 81%

High» 1 6%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- Verkar rimligt» (Adequate)
- It seems lower than it actually is to get a good result. At first I thought it was very low, maybe there should be more mandatory hand-ins or something?» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 6%

Adequate» 8 50%

High» 5 31%

Too high» 2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- My other course"s workload (Software Architecture) was Too High.» (High)
- The course on "Software Architecture" took to much time.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 18%

Good» 10 62%

Excellent» 3 18%

Genomsnitt: 4

- A very good tutor but rather poor course book.» (Good)
- Riktigt intressant kurs!!» (Excellent)
- Very interesting stuff indeed. It"s quite unfortunate that I found this out so close to my master thesis work. Otherwise I probably would have tried to attend more courses in the area.» (Excellent)
- The teacher John was really good and inspirating.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Alla exempel som Magnus har.»
- Course structure»
- John.»
- The seminars and the teacher.»
- seminars»
- LEAN/OUTSOURCING seminars»
- the course itself»
- nothing»
- Seminars»
- Keep the teacher.»
- seminars - can be considered even having more.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Nothing particular springs to mind.»
- there should be more mandatory hand-ins, essays or something. Anything that requires the student to start studying or reading a little more early in the course.»
- have the ppt before the study course»
- course book»
- the course title does not suit the course. the book has a lot of grammatical mistakes please correct them.»
- nothing»
- Change course book.»
- Invite externals Somehow try to encourage more discussions in lectures (eg. small group tasks, more discussions in groups etc.)»

16. Additional comments

- Very well done indeed. Well, I haven"t seen nor passed the exam just yet but I think it"ll be alright since everything else have been.»
- Too many models, some of them should be removed. Also many models that explain the same stuff in different ways, not needed either.»
- no»
- Try to made this course a project oriented course so that project can skip the examination.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från