ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPRSS 2007/2008 - RRY050 Radioastronomical techniques and interferometry, RRY050

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-05-27 - 2008-06-10
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 71%
Kontaktperson: Rüdiger Haas»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 80%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 100%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I missed one lecture.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 60%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 80%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 80%
Very well»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- There are two different web pages, and the first part of the course doesn"t use the web.» (Rather well)

9. Part-1 of the course: Radioastronomical techniques

How do you judge the particular content of this part of the course?

5 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Partly useful»2 40%
Mostly useful»0 0%
Very useful»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

10. Part-2 of the course: Astronomy interferometry

How do you judge the particular content of this part of the course?

5 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Partly useful»2 40%
Mostly useful»1 20%
Very useful»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

11. Part-3 of the course: VLBI for geodesy and astrometry

How do you judge the particular content of this part of the course?

5 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Partly useful»3 60%
Mostly useful»0 0%
Very useful»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

12. Before the course RRY050

Please specify your subjective impression on your personal knowledge BEFORE the course on the
contents of the three parts of the course.

Matrisfråga

Part-1 Radioastronomical techniques
5 svarande

very bad»1 20%
bad»1 20%
fair»0 0%
good»3 60%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Part-2 Astronomy interferometry
5 svarande

very bad»2 40%
bad»0 0%
fair»3 60%
good»0 0%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

Part-3 VLBI for geodesy and astrometry
5 svarande

very bad»2 40%
bad»0 0%
fair»2 40%
good»1 20%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

13. After the course RRY050

Please specify your subjective impression on your personal knowledge AFTER the course on the contents of the three parts of the course.

Matrisfråga

- I did not attend pasrt 3.»

Part-1 Radioastronomical techniques
5 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»1 20%
good»3 60%
very good»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

Part-2 Astronomy interferometry
5 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»2 40%
good»2 40%
very good»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

Part-3 VLBI for geodesy and astrometry
4 svarande

very bad»0 0%
bad»0 0%
fair»3 75%
good»1 25%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»2 40%
I did not seek cooperation»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- We were so few...» (I did not seek cooperation)

16. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»4 80%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Better with one or two hand-ins to get us working with the subject.» (Low)

17. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 80%
High»1 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- But I had three courses...» (High)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Susanne"s lectures»
- I am on astrophys track. The only first part is interested to me.»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Split the courses. Put the geodesy in a geodesy course.»
- I hope separate them if possible. This course combined all three tracks in one course. I think it is hard for me to follow other parts.»

21. Additional comments

- I dropped this course. The teachers are good, but I only interested to the first part of this course, had tried to be, but it seems doesn"t work to me.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från