ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Yacht materials, SJO225, 2007-2008

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-10-13 - 2007-11-13
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Rodney Rychwalski»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Sjöfart och logistik 180 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»3 42%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I have only participated in the lectures, and not attended the labs and exams and therefore I Hhave not spent a lot of time on the course.» (?)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 12%
100%»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 4.87

- General very good lectures.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 33%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Not taking the exam» (?)
- Too many questions on the exam, there was not time enough. I thought it would be more calculations needed in the exam.» (To some extent)
- Big exam, many question. Very stressful. Hard to answer all questions in 4 hour, and think em through proper.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»6 75%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The metals lecture was quite bad in my opinion, the subjects were already seen in courses as Engineering Materials.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The course compendium needs improvement, specially in chapter 3.» (Some extent)
- the compendium about frp is hard to understand. » (Large extent)
- The information in the "health and savety" handout were a bit much» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 12%
Very good»6 75%
I did not seek help»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»5 62%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

11. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»7 87%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- As fare as I could judge» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»4 50%
High»3 37%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The course in it self, a good understanding for a Naval Architect»
- Matlab calculation was very valuable sience i do not had expriece with matlab»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more lab sessios need to be added. visualisation is important»
- The labb should be changed. Would perhaps give more if we got to do our own laminate and then test it. »
- Wood and steel/AL has no sence, to little time to understand anything.»
- Tutorial was a bit confusing,»
- Wood, metal, and plastics lectures should be improved.»
- Fewer questions on the exam or an extra hour or so.»
- less questions on the exam, and more problem to solv "calculation". 30% calc 70% theory/questions. Otherwise it was a very good, interesting and fun course i think :)»

16. The level of information presented in the course was…,,.

8 svarande

too low»0 0%
reasonable»8 100%
too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

17. Should the course cover more or fewer topics?

8 svarande

more»1 12%
reasonable»7 87%
fewer»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

18. Solved problems helped to better understand computational aspects

8 svarande

disagree»0 0%
hesitant»1 12%
agree»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- But the number of problems should be higher and in a more real situation.» (agree)

19. Lab session was helpful to understand the laminate theory

8 svarande

disagree»0 0%
hesitant»2 25%
agree»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

20. Project/diary was helpful to realize the marine applicability of composite materials and connections between parts A-F

8 svarande

disagree»0 0%
hesitant»1 12%
agree»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

21. Compendium was a helpful source

8 svarande

disagree»0 0%
hesitant»2 25%
agree»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Include the pictures in the compendium for next year. The thread is lost when you have to look up the picture and reading the compendium becomes frustrating » (hesitant)
- Needs improvement in explaining calculations.» (hesitant)
- not always easy to follow.» (agree)

22. Organization of the course was transparent and caring

8 svarande

disagree»0 0%
hesitant»1 12%
agree»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

23. On the whole you would …,

8 svarande

not recommend the course»0 0%
hesitant»1 12%
recommend the course»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- a must have for the ones interested in yachts» (recommend the course)
- It was a very good, broad interesting course. It has given me a lot of knowlege aboat diffrent materials and manufactoring techniques. I stronly recommend it » (recommend the course)

Kursutvärderingssystem från