ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Learning and Leading in Dysfunctional Organizations 2014-15, TEK451

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2015-01-02 - 2015-01-15
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 78%
Kontaktperson: Jan Wickenberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs


Overall

1. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Worst course ever»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 45%
Excellent»5 45%
Best course ever»1 9%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 4.63

- I really liked the lecture and the teacher"s anecdotes. » (Good)
- A challenging course, but I feel the lack of involvment from my side lowers my general impression. The teacher tried, I tried but I never felt like I was in the game, so to speak.» (Good)
- This is new, to think like this is challanging. It hits you after a while, but in the beginning you search for a leading hand. Jan is really commited though. Maybe he just has a stronger believe in us finding it out ourselves then we have.» (Excellent)

2. The Pre-readings

Matrisfråga

- I found he pre readings a little too much. »
- Maybe some reflective questions would have helped in the preparatory reading, or a spoken task that we have to come up with questions/solutions for the next lecture. This was for example given to the text about bullying.»
- I read all texts, some texts were good, some bad in the sense that they didn´,t help me learn about a certain topic and understanding the course. Pentagon wars, It´,s your ship, Goleman, Feynman, bullying texts: I felt we talked about them, dissected them, the other texts weren´,t that involved in the lecture, and didn´,t add much.»
- Most preparatory work was directed to reading, and I did not learn the reflective writing style from that work. The first hand-in as well as the mid-term exam did, however, teach me quite much about a reflective writing style. Some more practice before the mid-term would have been good.»

I put lots of effort in the preparatory work
11 svarande

I totally agree»1 9%
I agree to some extent»3 27%
I neither agree nor disagree»6 54%
I disagree to some extent»1 9%
I totally disagree»0 0%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 2.63

The preparatory work made me learn much about the topic
11 svarande

I totally agree»0 0%
I agree to some extent»6 54%
I neither agree nor disagree»4 36%
I disagree to some extent»0 0%
I totally disagree»1 9%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 2.63

The preparatory work made me learn the reflective writing style (required for the Home Exams)
11 svarande

I totally agree»0 0%
I agree to some extent»3 27%
I neither agree nor disagree»4 36%
I disagree to some extent»3 27%
I totally disagree»1 9%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 3.18

3. The Lessons

This was a good lecture

Matrisfråga

- Maybe for increasing the exchange and activity in the class as a whole a more directive and coaching style would have helped.»
- The beehives are good for lowering the tempo of the lecture and the feeling of having to come up with the perfect answer (I think I personally put my bar of having good answers too high for myself). The lecture when we worked with the toys, writing instructions, on the board was really good, as well as when we put our thoughts about Feynman on the board in groups and then had a class discussion, more of that! Everybody got involved then i felt.»
- It would have been fun to do analyzis where we analyze the same situation from the perspectives from a few different models/theories (on at a time), instead of thinking more freely (using whatever models we wanted to use, as we did most of the time). »

The lessons helped me understand the topic well
11 svarande

I totally agree»2 18%
I agree to some extent»8 72%
I neither agree nor disagree»1 9%
I disagree to some extent»0 0%
I totally disagree»0 0%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 1.9

I would have preferred a more directive, lecturing style
11 svarande

I totally agree»0 0%
I agree to some extent»1 9%
I neither agree nor disagree»3 27%
I disagree to some extent»3 27%
I totally disagree»4 36%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 3.9

I would have preferred a more reactive, coaching style
11 svarande

I totally agree»0 0%
I agree to some extent»3 27%
I neither agree nor disagree»6 54%
I disagree to some extent»1 9%
I totally disagree»1 9%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 3

4. The course textbook Mullins (2010) Management & Organisational Behaviour

Matrisfråga

- I dont know if the book needs revision because i have not read it.it was verk difficult to understand that book so i decided to use alternative litterature.»
- I learned more from the swedish textbook Hur moderna organisationer fungerar»
- Didn´,t buy it, didn´,t read it. Would the facts have helped my analyzing skills?»
- I did not buy the text book. I used the e-book.»

I learnt a lot from the textbook
11 svarande

I totally agree»1 11%
I agree to some extent»2 22%
I neither agree nor disagree»3 33%
I disagree to some extent»1 11%
I totally disagree»2 22%
No answer/Other»2

Genomsnitt: 3.11

(I bought a copy) The book is good value for my money
11 svarande

I totally agree»0 0%
I agree to some extent»2 33%
I neither agree nor disagree»2 33%
I disagree to some extent»0 0%
I totally disagree»2 33%
No answer/Other»5

Genomsnitt: 3.33

The book needs major revisions for its next edition
11 svarande

I totally agree»0 0%
I agree to some extent»0 0%
I neither agree nor disagree»5 71%
I disagree to some extent»2 28%
I totally disagree»0 0%
No answer/Other»4

Genomsnitt: 3.28

5. The course administration

Matrisfråga

- The hand-out and hand-in categories in the Ping-pong interface was somehow a little confusing for me in the beginning. »
- The summary from each lecture is really good. Jan"s structure on Ping Pong is superb.»
- Good that you summarized lections, but didn´,t you miss some of them? Also I think some of the lecture hand-outs are missing?»
- On one occasion, I forgot to check the (iCalendar) schedule before going to the buss. However, I it very useful. You use the Ping Pong interface in a very good way (it becomes easy to find things)»

Having the course schedule as an iCalendar subscription file was useful to me
11 svarande

I totally agree»3 33%
I agree to some extent»3 33%
I neither agree nor disagree»3 33%
I disagree to some extent»0 0%
I totally disagree»0 0%
No answer/I did not use it»2

Genomsnitt: 2

The on-line web schedule was useful to me
11 svarande

I totally agree»3 27%
I agree to some extent»5 45%
I neither agree nor disagree»2 18%
I disagree to some extent»1 9%
I totally disagree»0 0%
No answer/I did not use it»0

Genomsnitt: 2.09

The hand-out section was kept relevant
11 svarande

I totally agree»7 63%
I agree to some extent»3 27%
I neither agree nor disagree»1 9%
I disagree to some extent»0 0%
I totally disagree»0 0%
No answer/I did not use it»0

Genomsnitt: 1.45

The Ping Pong user interface makes it easy to get what I am looking for
11 svarande

I totally agree»3 27%
I agree to some extent»3 27%
I neither agree nor disagree»4 36%
I disagree to some extent»1 9%
I totally disagree»0 0%
No answer/I did not use it»0

Genomsnitt: 2.27

6. The course location

The course was held mainly in KS1. What do you think about the room and its location?

11 svarande

It worked fine»10 90%
KS1 was neither worse nor better than any other room»1 9%
Consider being somewhere else next year»0 0%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 1.09

- It was good for this group size.» (It worked fine)


Chalmers standard questions

7. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 18%
Adequate»9 81%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%
No answer»0

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- We were given an appropriate amount of time for preparatory tasks and exams. I would not have minded some more interesting litterature or some more developing hand-ins though.» (Low)
- Look at changing part.» (Adequate)

8. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The discussion between the students Worked in small group»
- The anecdotes and analogies. The style of the home-exam. Analysis of movies and real life examples. »
- The lecture style»
- Good lectures, Jan, "tips for the future"»
- How the lectures were carried out. »
- The teacher»
- Jan, the anecdotes, his enthusiasm. The hand-ins, a really good preperation for the home exams and to develop a reflective writing style The feedback on all the writing The beehives, us writing our beehive conclusions on the board, with following discussion The extra time for end-term exam, made it easier to schedule in combination with other courses.»
- The commitment of the teacher. The anecdotes!»
- The lecturer, the lecture style, the book, the texts, the type of assignments. Everything was good.»

9. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I do not know, I like this course like that...»
- More references to theories in the book. To many textes in the middle-exam. »
- When the feedback on the mid-term exam is delivered. Would be more useful to get it earlier.»
- Nothing relly»
- The book»
- More writing, small hand-ins every week. Reflective questions in addition to the pre-reading. Spoken requirements of us comming up with questions or solutions for next lecture in addition to the pre-reading.»
- Questions to think about after reading a text before lecture. More assignments to train analyzing skills?»
- As I"ve mentioned above. I would have liked some more hand-ins to learn more about a reflective writing style. I would also like to have looked at the same problem with some different models (one at a time) in order to learn how apply them and their views, as well as getting more depth into my analysis. It would also have been nice to learn how to analyse deeply and show it in the text, without running out of pages (write short and still reflective).»

10. Additional comments

- It would have been interesting to read other studens mid-term exams and maybe give feedback to them. Would be good with more materials on the web if someone missed a lecture.»
- The PowerPoint presentations doesn"t tell me anything. They are awesome for someone WHO has read relevant litterature lika Jan but for me as a student is just a reference list that i should read. The home exam was very intresting and i loved it»
- The class wasn´,t that talkative. Could it have helped the atmosphere if we introduced ourselves?»


Kursutvärderingssystem från