ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Study social questionnaire 2014 - MPPEN

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2014-03-21 - 2014-04-03
Antal svar: 27
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Mikael Enelund»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

1. Where did you study for your Bachelor degree?

27 svarande

Sweden - Chalmers»19 70%
Sweden - another university»0 0%
University outside Sweden»8 29%

Genomsnitt: 1.59

2. Do you find your masters education meaningful?

27 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat meaningful»1 3%
Quite meaningful»8 29%
Very meaningful»18 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Will help in my career progression» (Very meaningful)
- The virtuell process planning course was not meaningful» (Very meaningful)

3. How satisfied are you with the content, structure and level of the programme so far?

Please comment if you have any concerns regarding content, structure or level

27 svarande

Very satisfied»7 25%
Satisfied»14 51%
OK»3 11%
To some extent»3 11%
Not at all»0 0%
No opinion»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- I like the link to the industry, but sometimes a bit more time could be spend on presenting the theory.» (Very satisfied)
- One course has been unstructured and it has been unclear what the purpose of it has been... (PPU165)» (Very satisfied)
- I think there is alot of repitition, but of course everyone does not come from the same background as me.» (Satisfied)
- Some changes has been made recently that will benefit the comming students.» (OK)
- Many courses handle similar topics and no communication seems to have occured between the examinators. » (OK)
- The general level is lower than I would expect, in regards to other universities. Chalmers needs to work on all areas of its master programmes in order to properly set itself aside as an attractive alternative among the world ranking. Today, that is not achieved, and it is obvious why when attending certain courses and seeing how badly structured they are, with bad organization and low-level content. Even exchange students feel very disappointed in having to pay for certain courses they feel they have not gained anything from. » (To some extent)

4. Do you believe the programme prepares you for a job as a professional engineer?

27 svarande

Not at all»1 3%
Somewhat»5 18%
Yes»12 44%
Yes definetely»9 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- The programme is good, but the reality is that it is very rare for someone who has recently finished the programme to receive a job position which correlates to the responsibility and duties the Master programme brings up, right from the start. So in a way yes, but not for a while. » (Somewhat)

5. Does the programme meet your expectations?

27 svarande

No, not at all»1 3%
Yes, to some extent»5 18%
Yes»16 59%
Yes and even better than expected»5 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- Some coures are not good» (Yes, to some extent)
- There should be another notch between "no, not at all" and "yes, to some extent" since some courses have been a real eye opener, while others have left me wondering why I am learning this in the first place. The courses vary a lot between being very overview-based and going into almost unneecesssry detail (in regards to the course contents). I feel this area in general should be worked on a lot, to make the students feel like they are attending something meaningful. Without going into too much detail, some courses need better investment in order to boost them up to today"s standards instead of having students limited to working on equipment from the late 70"s to the early 80"s. It is expensive to invest, but it is something worthwhile Chalmers should think about. Right now, the production engineering master does not make me feel as if I am studying on one of Chalmers main areas of advance.» (Yes, to some extent)
- I have heared that it sometimes was to easy and to little to do, and I don"t agree :)» (Yes and even better than expected)

6. What is your general impression of your masters programme so far?

27 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Rather poor»0 0%
OK»4 14%
Good»6 22%
Very good»11 40%
Excellent»5 18%

Genomsnitt: 4.51

- Was expecting more from a master level program. Bachelor was way way better.» (OK)
- I wish I could rate it higher, because I want to, but some courses really bring it down. I think looking the course evaluations will be a good guideline in knowing where to focus and improve. » (OK)

7. What do you think about the study work load in the programme as a whole?

27 svarande

To low»1 3%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»15 55%
High»10 37%
To high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.37 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The balande between courses are way of though, some are really hard and others not at all!» (Adequate)
- High is totally ok! It is for my own good to learn as much as possible in my studies.» (High)

8. How many hours per week do you spent studying at this programme?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire programme.

27 svarande

Less than 30 hours/week»2 7%
Between 30-40/week»9 33%
Between 40-50 hours/week»11 40%
Between 50-60 hours/week»4 14%
More than 60 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.74 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Same as last comment» (Between 30-40/week)
- Again, it depends largely on the course taken in question. On some courses, a lot of time is dedicated, around 40+ hours. On others, much much less. I"d be happy if I could count 7 hours in a week. The level and content is very uneven throughout the courses. » (Between 30-40/week)
- Lot of writing of hand-ins and reports that is quiet time consuming, but preferred examination type.» (Between 50-60 hours/week)

9. In general, how do feel about the availability of professors/lecturers/teachers?

27 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 7%
Good»10 37%
Very good»13 48%
Excellent»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Some does not respond to mail/pim fast enough, if at all. » (Good)
- Some teachers has been on conferenses during the study period... Or has been a teacher on an other university.» (Good)

10. In general, what do you think about the atmosphere between students and professors/lecturers/teachers?

27 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Respectful»16 59%
Friendly»22 81%
Helpful»20 74%
Open-minded»14 51%
Poor»0 0%

11. How satisfied are you with the programme management (programme head)?

27 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Not so satisfied»0 0%
Neither»2 7%
Satisfied»13 48%
Very satisfied»6 22%
No opinion»6 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.59

- I have not come in contact with what he/she does, so I have no general opinion. » (No opinion)

12. How satisfied are you with the cooperation between you and your fellow students in the programme?

27 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Not so satisfied»2 7%
Neither/Nor»1 3%
Satisfied»11 40%
Very satisfied»13 48%
No opinion»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.29

- We need peer review in all courses asap. So sick of slackers doing nothing and still passing course after course. Since there arent any routines to battle this you are guilted into just accepting it.» (Not so satisfied)

13. Do you think that the student opinions and results from course evaluations have significant impact (taken seriously by the programme management)?

27 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»9 33%
Could be improved»9 33%
Yes, definetly»6 22%
No opinion»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Have a few examples where problems reappear from last year.» (To some extent)
- We have mostly the same problems as previous years. Some improvements dough.» (To some extent)
- the virtual process planning course has not been improved since last year even if it got a bad grade from the course evaluation» (Could be improved)
- Some courses have had sub-par evaluation results for several years, yet things still have not changed. In other courses, the evaluation has been taken very seriously. Again, there is unevenness in the level and consistency within the programme. » (Could be improved)
- This point is really really important for the future of the programme!» (Yes, definetly)

14. Do you interact or work together with students with a different background than your own?

BSc = Bachelor of Science

27 svarande

Yes, with students with BSc from another university»6 22%
Yes, with students with BSc from another topic»3 11%
Yes, both of the above ones»16 59%
No»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.51

- Sometimes» (Yes, both of the above ones)
- We are forced to do that in some courses.» (Yes, both of the above ones)

15. Have you experienced any harassments or/and discriminations at Chalmers

if yes, please describe the situation.

27 svarande

Yes, both»1 3%
Yes, harassment»0 0%
Yes, discriminations»0 0%
No, none»26 96%

Genomsnitt: 3.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is too easy to start talk Swedish, even if there is international students around...» (Yes, both)
- Of course there has been comments that signal that the speeker is from a different era. But not with any harm meant.» (No, none)
- Offcourse in 5 yrs things have happened but none that is significant» (No, none)
- Not what I can think of.» (No, none)

16. Do you know who to contact in the case of harassments or/and discriminations?

27 svarande

Yes»8 29%
No»19 70%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

- This is information that is important and should be clear. I have no idea who to talk to if I find I have been unfairly treated, harassed or discriminated. » (No)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.33


Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.33
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66


Kursutvärderingssystem från