Visa resultat

TMA026 - Partial differential equations - second course

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 20 hours/week»		3		50%
Around 25 hours/week»		2		33%
Around 30 hours/week»		1		16%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»		1		16%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		4		66%
100%»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		4		66%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		2		33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- I thought the course would be deeper in context than it was» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		1		33%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		2		66%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		1		25%
To some extent»		2		50%
Yes, definitely»		1		25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The worst exam during my years at Chalmers (in every sense)» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		16%
Some extent»		2		33%
Large extent»		1		16%
Great extent»		2		33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		2		33%
Large extent»		2		33%
Great extent»		2		33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The coursebook is cheap but rather superficial, I mean its the second course in PDE the mathematical institution supplies. The literature should atleast be deeper so that it is possible to get a better view of the subject» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		0		0%
Rather well»		5		83%
Very well»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- It would be preferable if it could be set already from the beginning what exercises should be assignments and how the computer exercise would look.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		1		16%
Very good»		4		66%
I did not seek help»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		0		0%
Rather well»		3		50%
Very well»		3		50%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		4		66%
High»		2		33%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- It is a poor decision to release a computer exercise week 7 that also hasn"t been completely finished.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		2		33%
High»		3		50%
Too high»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- Both courses lacked the depth I wanted» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		1		16%
Fair»		0		0%
Adequate»		2		33%
Good»		2		33%
Excellent»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I did not learn much and the course was extremely boring.» (Poor)
- Needs depth in order to be exciting» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

16. Additional comments