ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


MVE095 - Options and mathematics

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 20%
Around 20 hours/week»2 13%
Around 25 hours/week»2 13%
Around 30 hours/week»4 26%
At least 35 hours/week»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- I had two courses at the same time, and this course took approx. 90% of the time.» (At least 35 hours/week)
- Jag kan inte riktigt uppskatta hur mycket tid men vet att jag fått sitta helger, vilket jag aldrig gjort innan. » (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 13%
75%»4 26%
100%»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.46

- Hade obligatoriska moment i en annan kurs som krockade med föreläsningarna i Matematik och Optioner. Hade gått på så många som möjligt annars. Peter var en riktigt bra och engagerad föreläsare.» (50%)
- Including the (very rewarding) extra time before each afternoon lecture. » (100%)
- Great lectures» (100%)


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»6 40%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 26%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 9%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 72%
No, the goals are set too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- För oss I-are krävs en bredare matte- och statistikkunskap sedan innan för att man ska kunna lägga rätt fokus på kursen.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 27%
Yes, definitely»8 72%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Jag kan inte kursmålen men jag tyckte att tentan borde innehålla minst en fråga till då den svåra frågan på vissa av de gamla tentorna var relativt lätt och på vissa väldigt svår. Då det ger väldigt stort utslag på betyget så skulle jag önska en fråga till så att tentamen bättre motsvarar den kunskap som eleven besitter.» (?)
- Examination was WAY too easy and "typad". This is VERY negative. Everyone is talking about it.» (To some extent)


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»11 73%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- Really good and committed teatcher. » (Great extent)
- Peter har varit fantastisk!» (Great extent)
- Jag jobbade en del på eftermiddagarna så kunde inte närvara på många extratimmar men vad jag hört från kursarna var de guld värda. Peter la ner mycket tid på att besvara frågor och allt möjligt, både på mail och efter/innan föreläsningar. Han förtjänar en stor bonus!!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 13%
Large extent»11 73%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 40%
Very well»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6


Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 13%
Very good»13 86%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

- Extra help for those who wanted two times each week, plus a 15 mins extra repitition before each lesson.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 13%
Very well»12 80%
I did not seek cooperation»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»1 6%
Low»2 13%
Adequate»6 40%
High»3 20%
Too high»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The projects were too easy. Many students complained or were talking about this but still decided to give you the impression that they found it hard. This is the truth.» (Low)
- Physics background. Can imagine it being difficult for those who are still on the bachelor.» (Adequate)
- Det här är väl ändå Chalmers, så det ska väl vara tungt. Men har aldrig lagt ner så här mycket tid på en kurs. » (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»2 13%
Low»2 13%
Adequate»4 26%
High»6 40%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- This course is incomparably much easier than the corresponding "Teknisk Fysik" couse (I am an F student and have taken both). You are in no way stretching the students.» (Too low)


Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»8 53%
Excellent»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Mycket intressant och rolig kurs, men ligger tyvärr på något för hög nivå för I-are.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Peter Helgesson. (Christer is very good as well)»
- Peter Helgesson and the "office hours"»
- The hand-in problems. And Peter as lecturer.»
- Peter och office hours!»
- Office hours»
- Peter! Questioning hours»
- Everything»
- Peter Helgesson, the best teacher I"ve had so far during my time at Chalmers. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Raise the level of the course and make more demanding projects. The examination was too easy this year.»
- Man bör tänka på att I-are inte sitter inne på lika stor mattebakgrund så ibland kan det vara bra att förklara även vissa av de stegen som för andra är självklara men som blir det som vi lägger mest tid på att förstå för att kunna lära oss kursen. »
- Perhaps the point system on the exam. Whats the point in grading with two decimals?»
-

16. Additional comments

- DO NOT MAKE A "typad" EXAMINATION. Make new and different questions every year. Ask more advanced theoretical questions that require true independent thinking and problem solving skills.»
- Riktigt bra kurs. Ser mycket fram emot att få läsa fortsättningskurserna och hoppas att de är lika bra.»
- Excellent but challenging course!»
- An additional Matlab exercise would have been interesting.»
- Peter did a great as lecturer. His positive energy as well as his genuine interest and knowledge in the subject made the lectures very interesting. »
- Vill än en gång slå ett slag för Peter! »
- Peter is the main reason for all my good/high/very well answers in this survey. He has been well prepared, got knowledge about the subject and most of all has he had passion and interest for the students and their learning. He has, despite his tight time schedule, always made everything to make the students understand and given them opportunities to ask questions. This has been extra important for the students who normally are studying on undergraduate level (like me). »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.33

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.33
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.83


Kursutvärderingssystem från