ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

GIS, VVT105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-04-01 - 2008-05-01
Antal svar: 25
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65%
Kontaktperson: Ida Karlsson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

25 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 28%
Around 20 hours/week»11 44%
Around 25 hours/week»5 20%
Around 30 hours/week»2 8%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- Before exam, and if there is project need to finish, the time would be a little bit more.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

25 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»1 4%
75%»11 44%
100%»12 48%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

25 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 8%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»12 48%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 32%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

24 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 12%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»21 87%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

25 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»11 44%
Yes, definitely»13 52%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»2 8%
Some extent»6 24%
Large extent»15 60%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»4 16%
Some extent»10 40%
Large extent»10 40%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.32

- The book wasn´,t to any help at all» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

25 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 8%
Rather well»17 68%
Very well»6 24%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- it would have been good if all the lecture sildes were put on the course hompage» (Rather badly)

9. When is the best time for the study visit to the City Planning Office?

23 svarande

First quarter of the course»10 43%
Second quarter of the course»7 30%
Third quarter of the course»5 21%
Fourth quarter of the course»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 1.86

- no matter» (?)

10. Should there be different subjects for the MapInfo assignment for the MPGEO and the MPEMA students?

25 svarande

Yes»11 78%
No»3 21%
No opinion»11

Genomsnitt: 1.21

- I think it is difficult to the non-swedish speaking students. why just chose the database of american? » (Yes)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

25 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 8%
Rather good»7 28%
Very good»15 60%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Very poor for mapinfo» (Rather poor)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

25 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 8%
Rather well»7 28%
Very well»16 64%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

13. How should the group composition be decided?

23 svarande

By the teacher»7 30%
By the students»7 30%
By the teacher and students together»9 39%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- not sure» (?)
- Mix with students with different background, nations, majors etc.» (By the teacher)
- It is important to mix students from different backgroynds in the groups, but maybe not totally.» (By the teacher and students together)

14. How was the course workload?

25 svarande

Too low»1 4%
Low»3 12%
Adequate»19 76%
High»2 8%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

15. How was the total workload this study period?

25 svarande

Too low»1 4%
Low»5 20%
Adequate»17 68%
High»2 8%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Read Water Wave Mechanics in addition to the GIS» (Low)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

25 svarande

Poor»1 4%
Fair»2 8%
Adequate»8 32%
Good»13 52%
Excellent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- No demands on students, wery small workload. Could pass the course with very little effort, not something you expect on Master"s level» (Poor)
- should had learned more things and I studied for two daysand passed the course» (Fair)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Handout exercise and computer work»
- Exercise lectures, and group project.»
- The laborations.»
- more practices on computer»
- I think it already very good, but maybe a little more useful for reality»
- Lab work»
- The computer lab.»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- more assignment»
- Some chapters were covered too fast»
- i did not really like the book. it was sometimes to complicated and to detailed»
- course literature. The book costs me a big money, but useless, and difficult to read and understand. Mission impossible to finish reading that book.»
- Perhaps more lectures on the theory?»
- maybe the database of mapinfo?»
- work with assigments, with texts and calculations through the course.»
- The projects should have a higjher value inside the course. They are more important than the exam. With the examples is easier to understand and apply the ideas to a real situation. The exam is just some things that if you need youll look it in a book.»
- Include the part on geostatistics and drop something that is not as important/relevant for a student interested in geotechnics and engineering geology»
- The mapinfo lectures were not good, it would be better to let the students do some kind of tutorial, almost like in the Arcgis programme. It is really hard to learn anything by listening to a teacher that goes through a programme. »
- The different subjects for the MapInfo assignment for the MPGEO and the MPEMA students.»
- The text book»
- Help during mapinfo»
- »

19. Additional comments

- Actually it"s a really nice course, worth to chose.»
- i am fully satisfied, thanks»
- Very "lazy" course with the final impression that I didn"t have to put much effort into the course and therefore unfortunately didn"t learn much»
- I think this course should be more practical.»
- It will be very helpfull if the lectures and the lab synchronized so that the lecture support the lab work.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från