|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Lean Production 2013, TEK230Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-05-28 - 2013-08-29 Antal svar: 30 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 35% Kontaktperson: Marie Iwanow» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Your workload1. On average, how many hours per week have you spent on the course, both individual work as well as lectures, seminars etc.?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - I´,m a slow reader, the articles took a lot of time» (20-25 hours) 2. On average, how much of the total education have you participated in?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.36 - Erasmus student.
Not able to spent more hours becouse I had another course with a similar schedule» (50-70%) 3. On average, how much time have you spent on each of the five seminars (time to be prepared for each seminar plus the time spent at the seminar)?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.56 - it was 6seminars this year. Good way to learn but some chapters were irrelative in comparasion for the questions. You felt that you just read them in order for the examinator to insure that you have read the hole course book. » (10-15 hours) 4. On average, how much time have you spent on the group assignments, lean game and value stream mapping (don’,,,t include the actual playing time and study visit time at the company)?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 - no company to visit» (<5 hours) Learning outcomes of the course5. How understandable are the learning outcomes of the course?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Didn"t rad but are kind of implicit» (I haven’,t read the learning outcomes) 6. Did the examination (seminars and group assignments) test if you have achieved the learning outcomes?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.96 - Vert focused on the production part while the course is an overal philosophy.» (To some extent) Education and course administration7. To which extent have the lectures contributed to your learning?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - The examination was almost solely based on the literature. Most lectures just said the same thing as the Liker book.» (To small extent (Grade 2)) 8. To which extent have the course literature and other course materials contributed to your learning?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.93 - Change the book to the other 14 principle book. Much more general and not so focused on the manufacturing part.» (To some extent (Grade 3)) 9. To which extent have the seminars and seminar tasks contributed to your learning?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.2 - Renew the questions and make the, more up to date.» (To small extent (Grade 2)) 10. To which extent have the group assignments (lean game, case and value stream mapping) contributed to your learning?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - They were all good.» (To some extent (Grade 3)) 11. To which extent have the compulsory guest lecturers contributed to your learning?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - More focus on their specific way of working which is hard to apply in a more theoretical question as the exam. » (To small extent (Grade 2)) Working climate and working conditions12. How well did the course administration work (web page, hand outs, etc)?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.03 - On several occasions the seminar task was distributed so late so I had to work more than 10 hours in the weekend.» (Very poor (Grade 1)) 13. How was the opportunity to get help and to ask questions to course responsible?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - I didn"t seek any help» (Ok (Grade 3)) 14. How did you perceived the reception from the course responsible?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.23 - A bit scattered and unclear of who does what.» (Ok) 15. How was the working climate between you and the other students?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.43 16. How was the total work load this quarter?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - It was so high I had to sacrifice the project course that was parallel to this.» (Very high (Grade 5)) General questions17. What grade would you give the course as a whole?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.13 - Stop seeing it as a set of tools and more of a philosophy.» (Ok (Grade 3)) 18. Was it good to use seminars as a learning method and as a part of the examination?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.4 - Sometime in the seminar someone doesn"t speak anything. Some questions asked by student are not easy to be discussed,because no one knows the answers so that there is no constructive discussions. Also, there are some questions that are too easy to answer, everyone knows the answer so no needs to repeat that answer. » (To very small extent (Grade 1)) 19. Would you recommend the course in its present from to other students? If not please motivate.30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - The workload was too high to be able to read another course at the same time.» (Probably not) 20. Is this course appropriate in your master program?30 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.23 - It has no great relevance for my master program but I think it will be very good to have when coming out in the working life! » (To very small extent (Grade 1)) 21. Lectures: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- The lectures could be made a bit more coherent. I feel that (the non guest-lectures) which where lead by several different lecturers often touched upon the same things so coordination could be better there.»- The main literature, the Toyota book, was a very single one-sided, thus not critical at all. Although the papers and lectures sometimes contributed to a development of a more critical, sophisticated opinion, the book played a big role and is in general just a glorification of what Toyota does. » - I"m not a fan of long and messy powerpoints. Keep it simply and avoid bad language.» - Everything is good.» - A practical class on creating future state maps. We only did a practical class for current stream and had a very brief lecture on future state. I see creating future state maps as a very important part of Lean.» - Generally good. » - The english and layout!! Too many slides saying pretty much nothing if you didn"t take proper notes at the lecture. As well, the english of the lecturer was not good and it was hard to stay focused. » 22. Seminars: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- Update the questions.»- Reduce the number of questions and restate the questions in seminar 6. Feedback takes too long when there are many questions.» - I would like more comments on how the assignment was, now it was basically pass or redo, would like to have a comment on what level I am on for the exam. » - The combination of seminars, lectures, guest lectures and the book was good. Maybe there is some other literature, which could be integrated.» - Too much reading for each seminar. Maybe some questions could be handins and have seminars with more questions if you aim for more than grade 3?» - För många och för omfattande! Det tog väldigt lång tid att ta sig igenom materialet och att svara på frågorna. Jag tycker även att det ska vara bättre framförhållning på seminarierna så att vi studenter skulle kunna planera vårt arbete bättre. Det är inte tillräckligt att få frågorna mindre än en vecka innan de ska vara inlämnade » - Usually the same people are speaking. One could put some effort into quiet the loud ones and lift forward the others by asking them about their opinions, etc.» - Some questions were hard to answer with literature and could be reworked.» - Sometimes hard to relate the questions to the literature, no clear connection.» - During the seminars it"s possible to better understand the topic explaned during the lessons. Maybe too much papers to read.» - Overall a very good concept. However, the readings were quite much for some seminars, especially from the book and I did not read all of them anyway, but still manage the questions. » - Faster feedback, be clearer on what is expected. » - Do less!! Takes to much time for other studies and also the group work. Take away the "pass without exam" and have less seminars. » - I suggest that the questions prepared for the seminars are the ones that should be discussed in the seminar. Otherwise you do not know if the answer that you have given is appropriate or not. Perhaps what can be done is to agree to discuss those questions that everybody found harder, e.g. a couple of them. Then the time can be distributed between these and some of the questions that the students came up with.» 23. Group assignments (lean game, case and VSM): What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?- I heard that students went to a real company and draw the value stream map last year. I don"t know why it"s cancelled this year.»- People that have been working with each other earlier are fast establishing groups by comfort. I think it could be good for everyone just to assign people to a random group for the group tasks.» - Maybe more feedbacks for the VSM.» - Very good, could have even more assignments like these. » - Lean game - keep! » 24. What should be changed concerning the course?- Lower workload.»- Apart from what I"ve already mentioned I see no meaning with making the 5th seminar in groups. Shorten it down instead or find another medical lean case.» - Start using ping pong instead of the student portal. For me and many other, the student portal has been very frustrating to use as it is very unstable.» - I would prefer to change the way of seminar that students need to discuss the prepared questions given by teachers. It at least would lead to some consensus or conclusion, otherwise, the questions are too broad to discuss. Every question might only slightly touch certain field, but no contribution to form some solid knowledge for students.» - Less articles to read or, at least, more time than one week.» - Have the group assignments and seminars gradet, not only pass or fail. » - As before, make the exam compulsory and reduce the amout of seminars to enhance the possibility to focus more time on case and group work. » 25. Comments and other remarks- Very good course and topics.»- I think it was a bit strange that we had a lean douse without using the 14 lean principles. The toyota way fieldbook didn"t used them at all» Thank you for your participation and effort in this evaluation!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6%