|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TME230 Structural Dynamics - Model Validation, TME230Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-05-22 - 2013-05-27 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50% Kontaktperson: Thomas Abrahamsson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - Most of the time at home and was spent doing the assignments.» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.2 - Really bad teacher in the exercises. » (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination (i.e assigments) assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.2 Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.4 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.4 - Very good literature notes.» (Great extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - Unfinished assignments published. A lot of problems with Matlab versions and all toolboxes as well as with Femap. Probably around 5h each week to this. » (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - Never had a teacher who spend that much time for the students.» (Very good) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 11. How was the course workload?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Most of the workload was due to the weekly assignments. Maybe one could reduce the number of assignments a bit and have an examination instead.» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - I was taking three courses, one being a project course. This was a bit too much, actually.» (Too high) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - With the above mentioned. Haven"t learnt so much about the subject. » (Fair) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- - great offer of help - good lecture notes - work in the lab»- The assignments and the lab. The only course where theory and reality is compared in a large extent, it has been a great learning experience. » - I think the lectures were good. I would keep them as they are.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- - less errors in the assignments - written examination at the end of the course - no presentation of MATLAB code in the exercises, rather hand calculations on blackboard»- 5 assignment, want good results in the end. » - Some assignments need a clearer problem description, and some programs need to be improved. » - Well, the assignments are very hard to follow. The English is far from clear. The instructions are essentially written in such a way that you have to be the author to understand them correctly. The results have been rather poor as well, especially for the last assignment. The FEMCali toolchain is not of sufficient quality to be used for the course. A mere space or citation mark (which incidentally are accepted at some places in the excel sheet) makes the whole simulation fail. Such software simply has no place in an educational setting. I"ve spent about as much time fiddling with immensly irritating and flat out irrelevant software bugs that has /nothing/ todo with the task at hand. The results do not inspire a lot of confidence either. I wanted to learn about EMA and physics, not obscure beta software. » 16. Additional comments- Throughout the course there was a very friendly and helpful atmosphere which made on overall very good impression.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%