ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Food biotechnology, KLI065, sp4 2013

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Bioteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 8%
Around 20 hours/week»3 25%
Around 25 hours/week»4 33%
Around 30 hours/week»4 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 8%
75%»5 41%
100%»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.41

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 55%
Yes, definitely»4 44%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 8%
Large extent»7 58%
Great extent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»3 25%
Some extent»3 25%
Large extent»2 16%
Great extent»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»5 41%
Rather well»5 41%
Very well»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 41%
Very good»7 58%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»1 8%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 25%
Very well»8 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 50%
High»6 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

12. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 8%
Adequate»3 25%
High»6 50%
Too high»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 16%
Good»8 66%
Excellent»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Project work presentations»
- The project and the blod lipid lab»
- Group work»
- Interseting lectures»
- the content of the course»
- blood lipid lab»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Sometimes the organization was a little bit confusing, because of many different teachers and subject, perhaps a better structure, organization of the course fo next year could be nice.»
- web page»
- The laboratory exercises were a disapointment. The blood lipid lab was interesting but the other laborations did not add that much.»
- Number of assignments (lab plus report, two theoretical assignments, lectures, presentation and exam)»
- the lab equipment was not ready. »
- Too much lecturers talking about similar topics. You get messed up a little»

16. Additional comments

- Very interesting Blood Lab, but the other two Labs were very theoretical.»
- I suspect that Thomas has missunderstood the block schedual concept. The course should not take up enitre days, only mornings OR afternoons. This misunderstanding created a lot of clashes, which was unfortunate. It was very confusing to get up to eg. 5 updates on pingpong a day and several times important info was updated very late (eg. the night before the lecture in the morning). E-mails with the most important info would have helped a bit but more structure would have been the best solution.»
- It would have been nice to perform the laborations in reality!»
- A very intresting course. Felt like some of the lectures were not tested on the exam.»

17. Value of project work

evaluate the literature project including the final seminar day

12 svarande

no value»0 0%
some value»0 0%
good value»9 75%
great value»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Very interesting to hear the different project works» (good value)
- The project was fun to do but the guidelines were so free and loose that it was hard to know what was expected. The possiblem number of points that can be awarded for doing the project is still not stated. In addidtion, it is not clear if it will be bonus points for the exam to add to the score or if the grading limits will be highered due to the additional points.» (good value)
- Maybe that every group could keep the presentation shorter, maximum 10 min?» (good value)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från