ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPCOM 1213-4 Multimedia and video communication, SSY150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 81%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

1. What is your study programme?

8 svarande

Communication Engineering»3 37%
Exchange student»4 50%
Other»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

- Computer Science - Algorithms, Languages and Logic» (Other)

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 22%
Around 20 hours/week»4 44%
Around 25 hours/week»2 22%
Around 30 hours/week»1 11%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 55%
100%»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 44%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 55%
I have not seen/read the goals»0

Genomsnitt: 2.55

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 85%
Yes, definitely»1 14%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2

Genomsnitt: 2.14

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»2 22%
Some extent»4 44%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- I did not learn a lot from the lectures, only by personal studying» (Small extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»5 55%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- If including the lab PM"s then the course material was of great help for my learning, if not then the course material was to a lot less extent helpful.» (Large extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 77%
Very well»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 33%
Very good»6 66%
I did not seek help»0

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 22%
Very well»7 77%
I did not seek cooperation»0

Genomsnitt: 3.77

12. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»7 77%
High»1 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

13. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»6 66%
High»1 11%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 11%
Adequate»2 22%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It can be better» (Good)
- Very nice hands-on labs with proper amount of workload.» (Good)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Presentation for Lab»
- The labs, I learned a lot from them»
- the projects»
- The labs.»
- Lab work»
- The goals.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Classroom»
- The lectures form»
- the project descriptions should be revised (especially for project 3).»
- The lectures could be more condensed and to the point, with links in online handouts to both deeper (more detailed) and broader subject information.»
- Nothing.»

17. Additional comments

- i would have liked to have 1 or 2 more lectures. Some topics were only worked on very superficially (e.g. wavelets) and i would have liked to get more detailed information. Maybe the question sessions for the projects could be shortened (only 30 minutes) to room for more lectures.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.66
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.66
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66

Kursutvärderingssystem från