ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SP4_12/13 Combustion engineering, MEN031

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-03 - 2013-09-17
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 37%
Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»5 45%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 54%
100%»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

- Missed a couple of classes due to double booking with Another course.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 18%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 27%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»2 18%
To some extent»7 63%
Yes, definitely»2 18%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I think that the calculation questions on the exam was not focused on what we had learned throughout the course.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

7. Rate the initial demonstration lecture by Fredrik Lind

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- Very nice introduction to the course» (Excellent)

8. Rate the lectures by Martin Seemann

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

9. Rate the lectures by David Pallarès

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 27%
Excellent»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.72

10. Rate the lecture by Lars Strömberg (Boilers and furnaces)

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- Did not attend on this lecture» (Adequate)

11. Rate the lectures by Anders Lyngfelt (Environmental Issues)

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»4 36%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»5 45%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Everyone who took sustainable energy futures already had this exact lecture with the exact same slides» (Fair)
- Make sure that he is prepared for next year so that the students don"t need to go get him since he was not properly informed.» (Good)

12. Rate the lectures by Sven Andersson (Internal combustion engines)

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Did not attend on this lecture» (?)

13. Rate the lectures by Lars-Erik Eriksson (Gas turbines)

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»3 37%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Did not attend on this lecture» (?)

14. Rate assignments 1 to 5 (reference design case)

11 svarande

Poor»1 9%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Confusing.» (Poor)
- Some of the teachers were not specific in what they wanted in the reports. This led to a lot of unnecessary repeating of stuff already done in previous assignments. The build up assignments are dependant on each other and so should the reports for the assignments. » (Fair)

15. Rate assignment 6 (completing task)

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»9 81%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Gave you a good perspective on how to deal with a given problem.» (Good)
- Nice ending session!» (Good)

16. Rate the exercise sessions

11 svarande

Poor»4 36%
Fair»1 9%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»4 36%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- Don"t understand the meaning of the exercises because basically non of it was used in either the assignments or in the exam. Should have been more focused on what kind of calculations that were coming on the exam, because I had no idea how to do these because nobody showed us how you should think. » (Poor)
- Lack any concept!» (Poor)
- Would have wanted more occations of exercise sessions to be able to understand more calculations than those attached with the assignments.» (Good)

17. Rate the assignments supervision by Jelena Marinkovic (Heat balance)

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 10%
Adequate»1 10%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

18. Rate the assignments supervision by Huong N’,,guyen (Chemical equilibrium)

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»1 10%
Adequate»5 50%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Really bad English competency!» (Poor)

19. Rate the assignments supervision by Alberto Alamia (Chemical reactors)

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»3 30%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»2 20%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- I think that it is bad to have a course assignment were you are allowed to use Matlab and the teacher doesn"t undestand Matlab-code which gave a lot of problems with the returns. » (Fair)

20. Rate the assignments supervision by Sadegh Seddighi (Combustion of solid fuel)

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

- Very nice that he gave us the numbers we were supposed to get in the result. This way we knew immediately if we did something wrong in our calculations and could correct it.» (Excellent)

21. Rate the assignments supervision by Hossein Bidgoli (Combustion of liquid fuel/burner)

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»2 20%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- During the lecture he didn"t give much help and when you asked for help he gave the wrong answer. And when we tried to corrected our return and we still got the wrong result he said that we shouldn"t send him a report if we didn"t have the correct answers, which he didn"t give us so we had no idea how to check if our answers were correct. I have never been this badly treated by a teacher at Chalmers in four years. And the same that he didn"t understand Matlab-code which just slowed down the process in finding the mistake. » (Poor)

22. How did you find the balance between course content: lectures/assignments/exercise sessions?

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»2 20%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- The lectures were good, but the assignments and exercises should be reorginized so that the assignments are better planned and the focus of the exercises should reflect on what we needed for the exam. » (Fair)
- As I said earlier I would have wanted more exercise sessions.» (Good)
- Very good balance! » (Excellent)

23. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Would have been nice with a index in the book. » (Large extent)
- Good compendium!» (Great extent)

24. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»10 90%
Very well»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Would have been nice to get more information about the study visit beforehand. » (Rather well)

Study climate

25. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»6 54%
Very good»3 27%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- We most often got the assignment reports back after the last opportunity to ask the teacher responsible for that assignment was done. » (Rather poor)
- Most assignment teachers seemed to be annoyed by the questions. Maybe clarify more beforehand what is expected and has to be done.» (Rather poor)

26. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»1 9%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- I really want to address it"s better to have smaller groups of 2-3 students rather then 4-5. The projects aren"t easy to divide within the group which causes a high workload for some students while it"s hard to contribute for the rest of the group. » (Very poorly)
- The groups were a little to big. Three students per group would have been better. » (Rather well)

27. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 27%
High»5 45%
Too high»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Revising some assignments about 10 times to fulfil the specific (unknown) passing criteria took huge amount of time for no more learning output.» (High)

28. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 9%
High»4 36%
Too high»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

- CFD and Combustion togehter are Neckbreaker. I will propose to the next years to only take 1 of them in this period.» (Too high)
- Sadly to say, my other course ruined this course for me. I did not have the time to study as much as I would have wanted since I Think this is a good and interesting course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

29. What is your general impression of the course?*

11 svarande

Poor»1 9%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I think that the lectures and the theory is very good, but the assignments and the exercises were poorly done. » (Good)

30. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- assignments»
- The assignments, I like that kind of work.»
- The assignments, very good for learning. And the presentation with Metso was also nice! »
- The lectures especially the introduction lecture. The theory questions to answer before examination was a great help!»

31. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- examination, assignments should be included in it, not only the last difficult examination»
- The assignments, the exercises and the planning of the course. Be more clear when deadlines are and when important stuff happens. »
- The assignment teachers should improve their english qualities. We received not a single correctly written mail this period. »
- Maybe not have 4 students in every assignment Group since it easily becomes that one or two students do all the work and the others just sits around. I would also like to have more exercise sessions.»
- The exam was a little bit too hard.»
- That it always should be 4 or more people in one group. As stated earlier it would be much better with smaller groups due to the fact it is hard to divide the workload between group members.»
- Try to move CFD and Combustion Engineering to different study periods.»

32. Additional comments

- last examination does not really reflects our knowledge of the course because calculations are too demanding and represent too many points»
- I think it"s a very good and interesting course, but unfortunetly the assignments and the exercises were bad. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.72
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.72
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.68

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från