ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


MPNAV 1213-4 Wave loads and seakeeping, SJO745

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-28 - 2013-06-15
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Carl-Erik Janson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 71%
Around 20 hours/week»2 28%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.28

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»3 42%
50%»3 42%
75%»0 0%
100%»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Lectures seemed unnecessary» (25%)
- Kände inte att jag kunde ta in kunskapen i det format som det förelästes. Jag lär mig inte med ekvationer utan med exempel.» (50%)


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 28%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- The goals were clear but I think the lectures did not quite prepared us to reach the goals. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 50%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66


Teaching and course administration

6. What is your opinion about the lectures?

7 svarande

Poor»5 71%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- Did not suit my may of learning the topic. The "wave lectures" were very good. » (Poor)

7. What is your opinion about the tutorials?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»1 14%
No opinion»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- The solutions could be a little bit more structured on the blackboard. Johannes did a very good job!» (Excellent)

8. What is your opinion about the OCTOPUS assignment?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 28%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»1 14%
No opinion»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- It was ok. Im not sure i learned much about sea keeping but at least i learned how the software works» (Adequate)

9. What is your opinion about the guest lecture on offshore?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»2 28%
No opinion»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

10. What is your opinion about the visit to SSPA?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»1 14%
Excellent»3 42%
No opinion»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- The report was a good way to make us learn more.» (Excellent)

11. What is your opinion about the assignment in the Bridge simulator?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»1 14%
Excellent»4 57%
No opinion»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

12. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»4 57%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.42

- Stopped attending after the first week. i learned all from the compendium» (Small extent)
- Mostly studied the material by my self and with the class outside lectures» (Some extent)

13. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- All of it» (Great extent)

14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42


Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 71%
Very good»2 28%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Johannes was very helpful» (Rather good)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»1 14%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»4 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

17. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»2 28%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»4 57%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- I really felt as if I had one course all semester» (Too low)

18. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»4 57%
High»0 0%
Too high»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.42


Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»1 14%
Fair»4 57%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Interesting topic but poor lectures, low workload and even lower expectations» (Poor)
- Feels like we could have learnt more. Especially when it comes to the design aspects.» (Adequate)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Sspa visits, bridge simulator, octopus»
- Tutorials, project assignment and bridge simulator should be kept for next year.»
- Octopus assignment»
- Octopussy, Bridge simulator, SSPA visit. Claes Eskilsson who presented his material very well. Claes is a rising star!»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Lectures format: less equations more explanations on theory needed for the exam. We absolutely need extra assignment before the octopus assignment is due. Two or three small projects with a 3-4 page report about EoM, responses, etc would be much needed. In order to keep us engaged in the course.»
- Lectures are not very clear and informative. Some of the lectures were not being held because of the lecturers condition. »
- the lectures need to be changed to engage the interest of the students.»
- The lectures»

22. Additional comments

- The major problem is that we got disengaged from the course after the second week when we realized the expectations on us were low.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.14

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.14
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.28


Kursutvärderingssystem från