ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Idea evaluation 2013 Sahlgrenska, MED982

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-15 - 2013-03-24
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 10%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 100%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The last four weeks were much more intense than the first weeks» (Around 20 hours/week)
- class time + group work + studying» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 33%
75%»0 0%
100%»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- I missed one lecture» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 33%
Yes, definitely»2 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»1 33%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»1 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 33%
Very well»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Lectures

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lectures:

9. André Kelkkanen (Early Stage Verification)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 66%
3»0 0%
4»1 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- In our case, this lecture was held too late to be of any value really» (2)

10. David Andersson

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»0 0%
5»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

11. Emil Haldorsson (IP/FTO/Novelty)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 33%
5»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- Very clear and consise» (5)

12. John Holmberg (Sustainability and Backcasting)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 66%
4»1 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

13. Karen Middleton Williams

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 50%
4»1 50%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

14. Marine Agouge (C-K)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»2 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

15. Mats Lundqvist

3 svarande

1»1 33%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»0 0%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

16. Nils Ekström (IP Valuation from a Volvo Technology Perspective)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 33%
3»1 33%
4»1 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

17. Sverker Alänge

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 66%
4»1 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

18. Staffan Truvé (Temporal Analysis - Recorded Future)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»0 0%
5»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Study climate

19. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»1 33%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»2 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

20. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

21. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
High»2 66%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- High but that is good. It was a really good and interesting course and the courses should be demanding» (High)

22. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
High»2 66%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- See comment on question 21» (High)

Summarizing questions

23. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The course literature, articles, Recorded Future lecture»
- David Andersson is a great lecturer and course coordinator. really pulls the whole course together and is a great mediator.»
- The sustainability lecture and the FTO lecture were really good. Some of the workshops were good but other felt like waste of time.»

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- nothing i can think of»
- The lectures has to be more concrete and more to the point. This is the reason why a lot of people did not turn up on lectures, because if the fussiness and the abstract lectures that was more of a wast of time eater than a good learning time»

26. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 5
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 1

Kursutvärderingssystem från