ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPAME/TME085-12/13, TME085

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56%
Kontaktperson: Johan Bankel»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 41%
Around 20 hours/week»5 29%
Around 25 hours/week»3 17%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»3 17%
25%»2 11%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 23%
100%»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 23%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 11%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 13%
Yes, definitely»10 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»5 29%
Some extent»2 11%
Large extent»8 47%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»6 35%
Great extent»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 64%
Very well»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»16 94%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

- The possibilities to get help were very good but the students were also welcome to ask questions and there were never any negative reactions when asking for help. More courses should learn from this! » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 11%
Rather well»3 17%
Very well»12 70%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

11. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»11 64%
High»5 29%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

12. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»3 17%
High»13 76%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 11%
Good»9 52%
Excellent»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The last assignment (number 3) could/should be one or two weeks later than it was now. This due to the fact that we"d just had unsteady flow in the lecture and I think that no one had really achieved deep understanding on the topic, excluded the things that were thought in the lecture.» (Good)
- Very nice study climate, thanks to the course assistants in particular. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignment 1 and 3 they were really good to understand things better.»
- The structure as a whole!»
- The three assignments were very good.»
- The assistants in the course, they were very helpful and did a great job!»
- The CFD assignment.»
- Lars »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Assignment 2a and b. Need to get more information about what the different settings in fluent and icem actually mean. Would help both students and teacher. And the assignments should be checked if they actually can be solved. If something did not work this time change it now when you remember what it is.»
- The one mentioned above + at least some kind of presentation of the code used in assignments 1 and 3, now it was mainly just "here you choose this and there you choose this" etc.»
- The presentations for assignment 2b should at least be divided into half, since it is too long to listen to the same projects 3 times and in total for 4 hours.»
- Try to finish the project a week earlier, to make room for more studying for the exam the last week if possible.»
- Examination could be made a little challenging. This was far too easy. At least theory questions could have been little thought stimulating.»
- I would have liked some kind of demonstration or laboration, thats good for motivation i think! »

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.23
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.23
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.8

Kursutvärderingssystem från