ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

DIT165 Design and Dev of Embedded Systems, DIT165_GU

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-16 - 2013-04-07
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Peter Lundin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: GU
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: GU

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 17%
Around 20 hours/week»6 35%
Around 25 hours/week»5 29%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»1 5%
25%»3 17%
50%»1 5%
75%»6 35%
100%»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- I tried to attend all lectures but was unable once or twice.» (75%)
- i attended all the lectures, but not all the excersizes because i have to do other courses in third year.» (100%)

3. Are you registered on the course for the first time ?

17 svarande

Yes»14 82%
No»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 1.17

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 23%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- teacher mentioned the exam structure,however we had something totally diffrent » (The goals are difficult to understand)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 88%
No, the goals are set too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- The key phrase if "considering your background", that is why I have answered like this.» (No, the goals are set too high)

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»6 35%
Yes, definitely»8 47%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»5 29%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»5 29%
Great extent»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- You do have knowledge, however, you are quite bad at presenting it.» (Small extent)
- The lectures were a good aid in giving broad knowledge, I pick things up fast and I simply prefer to read up on details on my own.» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»3 17%
Some extent»7 41%
Large extent»5 29%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- The assignments were helpful.» (Small extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»13 76%
Very well»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

10. The level of the course exercises were broadly:

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 64%
High»4 23%
To high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- I feel there were some spikes in difficulty on some excercises, like the last one, or rather mainly the ones involving the simulated environment » (Adequate)

11. For what proportion of the course exercises have you done or helped to done solutions.

The question refers to if you made solutions, not if you handed them in via GUL.

17 svarande

0 %»0 0%
25 %»3 17%
50 %»4 23%
75 %»7 41%
100 %»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- We had a system in our group were each member does a t least one part of each work package, then we share our solutions to gain understanding» (25 %)
- Individual assignments could/would be better, in my opinion.» (75 %)

12. Is there any part of this that you think should be increased or decreased

The course content was this year structured in following parts and its proportion in relation to the whole course.
No answer -> Proportion ok as it is.

Matrisfråga

- I think the course should be more points and focus even more on c/c++ style of programming»

. General C-programming with focus on, pointers , structs, lists and dynamic memory management. ( 45 % )
12 svarande

Increas»7 58%
Decreas»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 1.41

. I/O and bit management in C including some of ADC. (20%)
12 svarande

Increas»9 75%
Decreas»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

. General about interrupt handling (15%)
11 svarande

Increas»8 72%
Decreas»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 1.27

Various concepts regarding Real-Time systems (20%)
12 svarande

Increas»9 75%
Decreas»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»9 52%
Very good»6 35%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»2 11%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»3 17%
Very well»10 58%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- im redoing the course, im not belonging to the same student group of this year.» (Very poorly)
- At least the people in my group.. » (Very well)

15. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»14 82%
High»1 5%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

16. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»10 58%
High»4 23%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»3 17%
Adequate»3 17%
Good»7 41%
Excellent»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.47 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Quite hard exam» (Adequate)
- Awesome teacher ,)» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the assignments»
- good information »
- i think the course is nice so it should be kept as it is.»
- Did have nough info about Register (in code wise). we understood the theory but not codding it »
- I think overall the coruse was very good»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- maybe not having to buy the arduino for a single exercise»
- change the date of exam because its impossible to do two exams on the same time same c course ans test verification course »
- More information about structs and linked lists»
- Coordinate better with T4 project and maybe use the same board as the project so students don"t have to buy their own for one small assignment.»
- the students.»
- exam was hard according to the info we had »
- Perhaps more focus on interupts and if possible I"d like to see a removal of the simulator enviorment or an upgrade of it, it feels old and very tricky (perhaps a lecture showing more of how it works would be enough)»

20. Additional comments

- Please allow the bonus points to be counted in the re-exam also! »
- thank for your helping »
- Thank you and have a nice spring and summer!»
- i didnt pass the exam. in fact i was sad in the begining because of that, one reason was because of the big change in the structure of the course and the exam comparing with previous years. but after a while i started to study harder, in fact i do understand more now and i feel im going deeper in the c language than before, this make me happy in some way and i hope to pass the exam next time.»
- reducing the passing grade»
- It was a very enjoyable course and a big thanks to the teacher and the supervisors for doing a good job!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.47
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.47
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.61

Kursutvärderingssystem från