ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biological materials, KPO045, sp3 2013

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-03-18 - 2013-04-14
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Bioteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 14%
Around 20 hours/week»5 35%
Around 25 hours/week»4 28%
Around 30 hours/week»3 21%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 42%
100%»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 35%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 25%
Yes, definitely»9 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»5 38%
Large extent»3 23%
Great extent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 78%
Very well»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»2 14%
Very good»9 64%
I did not seek help»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»3 21%
Very well»10 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 78%
High»3 21%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»6 42%
High»5 35%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»4 28%
Good»6 42%
Excellent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.78 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- good additional material, e.g. papers»
- Biomimic studio was really interesting!»
- The practical view on the biological materials- it was fascinating to read and hear about the application of the properties of these materials!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Not as many articles to read (one article was 250 pages which Is way to much)»
- lectures shouldn"t be hold by different lectures who seem to have no idea what they are talking about and don"t even understand the slides they are presenting. projects could be more defined. »
- Hard to know what is relevant for the course when articles etc is added to the ordinary material. It became quite stressful with the large project, since they did not start until the small one was done. Maybe incorporate the two projects more? Tell the students that you are going to have quizes. I thick that they will start to study earlier and you acctually get a chance to know some of the questions.. »
- Better course material.»
- Some more testing opportunities for the material-project? Additionally to mechanical testing, maybe something chemical also- for example the change of properties depending on the surrounding conditions (salinity, temperature of solution, etc).»

16. Additional comments

- More test exams avail for the students»
- Some slides were added the nigth before the morning lesson when they were to be used. Some slides were not even uploaded on pingpong before the lesson. Some slides were contradictory to each other for ex. the pictures of cellulose. Some of the project labs were very close to the deadline for the reports»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.78
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.78
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.69

Kursutvärderingssystem från