|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPBME 1213-3 Image analysis, SSY095Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-03-15 - 2013-04-12 Antal svar: 34 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 69% Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Read this before filling in the questionnaireKeep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.55 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.79 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.32 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.28 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.33 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.27 Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.02 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.14 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 9. Comments about teaching and course administration- There was no info about that there were exercises on arturs part for example. I also feel that it is kind of a bad idea of andrew to put up tutorial questions without answers and then releasing the answers some week before the exam. How are you going to learn or know wether your answer is right or not? The lecture notes didn"t help for this, if they would have, then I wouldn"t complain over this.»- The amount of stuff taught is a lot and sometimes teachers tend to skip important things. I prefer of they teach slowly and clearly the important stuff.» - tlab) as well as "tutorials" (pen and paper) in order to get the concept. A task that was tedious when you also had a total of four labs and another course.» - Too much curriculum for 7 weeks. Teachers just state algorithms and do not give any or too few examples. Most of the students feel that we do not really learn something at the end» - The teaching quality was really not satisfactory» - There is too much content that should be know.» - The lectures should include much more examples!» - The lectures are very un-even in content. Some cover too much information, which makes it difficult to pay attention» - Some lectures were too extensive, making it hard for the lecturer to finish on time and for the students to take in the information.» - Lots of documents, but rather unclear and some are hard to find» - Some lectures too slow, some lectures too fast» - Andrew tries to get through far too much material in a lecture, and Artur can"t articulate himself in english. This course was very poor.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) - Arthur"s lectures did not always contribute to learning. Usually they were slow, and it was sometimes hard to follow what the goal with the lecture was. However, the demonstrations he made were quite useful. Andrew, on the other hand, tried to fit in too much information on his two hour lectures. The presentation slides could be between 60-80 slides, which requires a pace soo high that it was hard to follow. Besides the lectures it was supposed that we should deal with some "practicals" (matlab) as well as "tutorials" (pen and paper) in order to get the concept. A task that was tedious when you also had a total of four labs and another course.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 12. How was the course workload?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.73 13. How was the total workload this study period?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.85 Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?34 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.35 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Nothing.»- The lab content was very good and can be preserved next year» - Its too hard, too much for too little time.» - The laboratory sessions and the reports are well planned. In fact, a lot of things that I don"t understand during the lectures were easy to understand doing the laboratory sessions.» - The lab sessions. They were good for understanding.» - The labs sessions» - lab» - Labs» - The labs.» - The lab hours and the labs were good for actually learning something.» - The laborations» - lab» - Labs» - The labs and a larger project» - The labs were educative and well planned, but most required way more time than the expected 4 hours! » - Laborations» - The Labs Guest Lectures» - more exercise solving» - Very good course. I really liked the Lab and the guest lectures.» 16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- ur is quite good when you ask him in person. Another problem is that these lecturers are not situated at this school, at least i couldn"t find any offices that were theirs and therefore you couldn"t get hold of anybody who could answer questions about exercises so in my oppinion it is as if you are expected to learn and understand everything by your own. Maybe its time to put in some exercises and some phd"s helping students or just change so that the students can get help when needed, not the week before exams or during lectures.»- - Change to one lecturer - The exam didn"t test any working knowledge of the field, it only tested if I know how to do the mechanics behind algorithms, which frankly, is pointless given that every calculation in this field is done by computer. - Continuous examination should be implemented. 4 Labs and a project, only to be disregarded during grading? - the exam was really long» - The division of content between Andrew and Artur. Content of this course can be reduced. » - The course shouldnt have a difficult exam. The labratory and projects takes alredy too much time.» - The lab instructions seems a bit dated. » - The exam. They expect us to do too many exercises in only 4 hours. I must say that the exercises are not too difficult, but it is impossible to answer all of them in the time we have. I was frustrated when I realized the exam was over and I needed more time to finish it.» - A different lecture setup. Different lectures or more organization. This years" organization was terrible.» - Cut the curriculum and do it in a descent way. This quarter thing suck in general anyway.» - If I have to show the knowledge of an algorithm I can do that with less calculation (for example the 4x4 matrix for mean shift). The amount of time is few compared to the amount of exercises.» - project,tutorial» - Labs and Projects should be taken into account in final grade» - The labs and the project should have more contribution to the final score as they costs a lot in time.» - THe project were pretty useless. If we are going to do prject there should either only be a few choices so that student can discuss among eachother or the teachers needs to be more accessable. The exam is a mess! I can really not see the point in have questions that take so much time to answer. Calculating 1000 stuff on several of the assignments is just stupid. I know that arthur said that we should know the material well enough so that we have time to do everything, but it is still really stupid. You do not give the student a fair chanse to proov what you know!» - The exam was WAY to long! It feels very bad to, in my case, know how to solve an exercise but not be able to do it because of lack of time on the exam. I know this has been issued before, why can"t you learn from your previous mistakes?» - if the lecture can focus more on several rather important issue rather than give a brief introduction about overall subjects, it could be better.» - The exam was too long and too difficult compared to previous years» - The lab should be corrected a lot more before and not few days before the exam so we could finish it sooner and begin the next period with nothing else to do for this class» - The exam was too hard.» - Examination. The thesis wasted a lot of time with really unneccessary stuff, like computing 13 iterations by hand (wouldn"t two suffice?), which was common for previous exam as well. Focus thesis on understanding, not on time-consuming computations.» - To much content in the course. Should focus more on some areas instead. To many tasks on the exam, very hard to finish in time. Maybe a larger project could be added as examination and a smaller exam. Or use the exam to get higher grades.» - Give points for the labs for the exam. We spent so many hours doing them.. Better structure is needed- there were too many things to do with the tutorials, practicals, exercises, and extra litterature in form of articles» - 1. The extent of some lectures, too much material. 2. The final exam really needs to change, way too many time-consuming questions for a four hour exam. Either less questions in the exam, so it would actually be possible to finish it before time is up (which wasn"t the case). Or examinate with a bigger project, which makes more sense in a course like this. 3. The rule of that groups of three will get extra tasks, some students just ended up without a group because of this. With this logic individual students shouldn"t have to do as much as groups of two, right?» - The exam!!» - First lab was much heavier than the rest, could shrink it to be more reasonable level. Slower pace and fewer slides for Andrew to have time for all of them in one lecture and avoid rushing through them. More calculations, SOLUTIONS and not only answeres, defenitely answeres to subproblems in the problems» - Lab number one was a lot more complicated than the others so maybe better preparation needed. The exam has nothing to do with the lectures. Only did a couple of exercices during the classes and it is not enough. Maybe adding some hours of exercices per week will help understand them better. The exam is too long to do in four hours. I know I am not the only one who did not manage to finish. I don"t think is fair to have 8 point in the exam where the book was needed, the people who did not have the book could not answer this question. Maybe those pages should be added in appendix.» - please not hard exam » - I think it would be good to make some mandatory supervision session or draft hand-ins for the project. This would maybe prevent students from starting to late with the project or working into a wrong direction.» - In my opinion during the course it was quite hard to learn something unless you started sitting and make some guesses and google on other lecturers slides and this is shows how bad the situation im describing is. Other than that artur is quite good when you ask him in person. Another problem is that these lecturers are not situated at this school, at least i couldn"t find any offices that were theirs and therefore you couldn"t get hold of anybody who could answer questions about exercises so in my oppinion it is as if you are expected to learn and understand everything by your own. Maybe its time to put in some exercises and some phd"s helping students or just change so that the students can get help when needed, not the week before exams or during lectures.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) 17. Additional comments- - Change to one lecturer - The exam didn"t test any working knowledge of the field, it only tested if I know how to do the mechanics behind algorithms, which frankly, is pointless given that every calculation in this field is done by computer. - Continuous examination should be implemented. 4 Labs and a project, only to be disregarded during grading? - the exam was really long»- Exam practice was inadequate. Teachers should advise students to attempt part 2(Artur"s) of exam first and part 1(Andrew"s) later. This way they can save time.» - The exam tried to cover "too much" content. I think it would be better to skip the exam and instead make the project part bigger. » - There were too many problems for the time we had at the exam and that is not my personal but a majority opinion» - Reduce the length of the exam and add a bigger project instead!» - Very interesting, but exam was very poorly constructed.» - The exam was too long and too difficult. No one had time to finish it. This was a terrible exam!!» - »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14%