ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

KBT167 - Applied Nuclear Chemistry 2012, KBT167

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-18 - 2013-01-07
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68%
Kontaktperson: Stefan Allard»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

1. Lectures: relevance

Please grade how relevant the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»4 36%
4»3 27%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. Lectures: interesting

Please grade how interesting the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

10 svarande

1»1 10%
2»3 30%
3»1 10%
4»2 20%
5»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

3. Lectures: difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the lectures in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

10 svarande

1»1 10%
2»3 30%
3»4 40%
4»2 20%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. Lectures: handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»1 9%
4»7 63%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The slides were quite small, some equations wer hard to read, they should contain 2-4 ppt pictures per slide, not six.» (2)

5. Lectures: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 40%
4»4 40%
5»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

6. Lectures: Number of lectures

Would you have liked more lectures to cover the course?

10 svarande

Yes»1 10%
No»9 90%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- It would have been nice to cover chapter 17.» (Yes)

7. Lecturer: Prof. Gunnar Skarnemark

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

11 svarande

1»1 9%
2»2 18%
3»5 45%
4»2 18%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- He is actually quite good, but the stammering makes it very hard to follow the lectures (unfortunately).» (2)
- Knowing and helpful.» (4)

8. Lecturer: Prof. Christian Ekberg

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 27%
3»3 27%
4»4 36%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.27 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

9. Home exercise - MALRAD: understanding

Please indicate how the home exercise - MALRAD - has increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

11 svarande

1»1 9%
2»2 18%
3»5 45%
4»2 18%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

10. Home exercise - MALRAD: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the home exercise - MALRAD - has been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»4 36%
4»4 36%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. Home exercise - MALRAD: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the home exercise - MALRAD - has been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»3 27%
4»4 36%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

12. Home exercise - MALRAD: difficulty

Please grade the home exercise - MALRAD - with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»5 45%
3»2 18%
4»4 36%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The given data were very bad, it was impossible to energy calibrate correctly (even in the detector"s software)» (2)

13. Laboratory exercises: understanding

Please indicate how the labs have increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»1 9%
4»6 54%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The labs were very good and interesting» (5)

14. Laboratory exercises: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the labs have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»1 9%
4»6 54%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. Laboratory exercises: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the labs have been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»3 27%
4»4 36%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 9%
4»7 63%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

17. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»3 27%
4»6 54%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Marcus Hedberg, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»2 18%
4»5 45%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

19. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using alpha-spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 9%
4»8 72%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 4.09 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using alpha-spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»5 45%
4»4 36%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

21. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using alpha-spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic. Phil. Elin Löfström-Engdahl, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 9%
4»7 63%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using mass spectrometry - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 18%
4»6 54%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.09 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

23. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using mass spectrometry - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

11 svarande

1»1 9%
2»0 0%
3»5 45%
4»4 36%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

24. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using mass spectrometry - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic.Eng. Anna Gustafsson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»7 63%
5»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

25. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 27%
4»4 36%
5»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.09 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

26. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»4 36%
4»4 36%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

27. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Ph.D. Stellan Holgersson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 18%
3»3 27%
4»4 36%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

28. Calculation exercises: relevance

Please grade how relevant the calculation exercises in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 10%
3»0 0%
4»6 60%
5»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

29. Calculation exercises: difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the calculation exercises in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 20%
3»5 50%
4»2 20%
5»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

30. Calculation exercises: handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 30%
4»4 40%
5»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is very good that the handouts have included solutions to all the problems, not only those presented at the exercise.» (5)

31. Calculation exercises: number of occasions

Would you have liked more calculation exercises to cover the course?

10 svarande

Yes»5 50%
No»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

32. Calculation exercises: time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 30%
4»5 50%
5»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

33. Calculation exercises: supervisors

Please grade the supervisor Lovisa Bauhn, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»6 60%
5»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

34. Calculation exercises: supervisors

Please grade the supervisor Marcus Hedberg, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

10 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 20%
4»6 60%
5»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Marcus is knowing and helpful but can improve his handwriting.» (4)

35. General: Workload

Please indicate how you perceive the 7.5 hp workload, with 1 being "very low" and 5 "very high".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»6 54%
4»3 27%
5»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Most of the work load came from the labs.» (3)
- Only the labs and their reports took time. But the labs were done very close to the exams, which made the last week very intense.» (3)

36. General: Textbook

Please grade the book "Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry", with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»3 27%
2»2 18%
3»2 18%
4»4 36%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The course litterature "Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry" is a good example of a book that should not be used for education. It doesnt explain much at all, its a good thing it was not used muck in the course. Thanks for the slides!» (1)
- More explanations and derivations would be nice, not just saying examples of how things work, but not why.» (2)

37. General: Administration

Please grade the course administration in general, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

11 svarande

1»1 9%
2»1 9%
3»3 27%
4»5 45%
5»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.36 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I believe that there were too many people involved in the administration of the course.» (1)

38. General: Information

Please indicate how well course information was provided, with 1 being "terribly" and 5 "excellently".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»5 45%
4»2 18%
5»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

39. Exam

Please indicate how well the exam reflected the course, with 1 being "poorly" and 5 "very well".

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 9%
3»3 27%
4»3 27%
5»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Thanks for a good course!» (5)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.62

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.62
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från