ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Applied intellectual capital management, TEK295

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-18 - 2013-01-02
Antal svar: 2
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 11%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

2 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 50%
Around 25 hours/week»1 50%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

2 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

2 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

2 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

2 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 50%
Yes, definitely»1 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

2 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

2 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 50%
Large extent»1 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

2 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 50%
Very well»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Specific lectures

It is also useful for us if you can provide feedback on specific lectures, whether in terms of content, administration or other aspects. This helps us learn which lectures to include, which lecture formats are most appreciated, and allows us to communicate results to our external lecturers, who are almost always interested in hearing how their lecture went. Try to comment on as many lectures as you can.

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lecturers:

Week 1

9. Team and Leadership Skills pt.1 (Gregory Carson)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- I liked the topic but find it hard to understand the matching into the course and how this affected our graded examination. Could have had this leadership stuff as a two day seminar instead? Or oneday seminar twice during the semester? My main point is that I want it separate from a course.» (5)

10. Data and Information Gathering (Emil Haldorsson, Karthik Venkitesh)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Good lecturer!» (4)
- All these "tools"-lectures held a good level and were executed well overall. However they came to early in relation to the Applied projects and had little relevance to the actual examinations (assignment 1-3).» (4)

Week 2

11. Introduction to Market Analysis (Erik Hansson)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Bit basic but still necessary» (4)
- All these "tools"-lectures held a good level and were executed well overall. However they came to early in relation to the Applied projects and had little relevance to the actual examinations (assignment 1-3).» (4)

12. Team and Leadership Skills pt.2 (Gregory Carson)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- Very interesting!» (5)
- I liked the topic but find it hard to understand the matching into the course and how this affected our graded examination. Could have had this leadership stuff as a two day seminar instead? Or oneday seminar twice during the semester? My main point is that I want it separate from a course.» (5)

13. Patent Searching (Emil Haldorsson)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- All these "tools"-lectures held a good level and were executed well overall. However they came to early in relation to the Applied projects and had little relevance to the actual examinations (assignment 1-3).» (4)

Week 3

14. IAM in Practice pt.1 (Jonas Lindgren, Sebastian Palmgren)

1 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

15. IAM in Practice pt.2 (Jonas Lindgren, Sebastian Palmgren)

1 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

16. PRV Workshop (Anna Ax)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 50%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Fun to meet with a person working at PRV!!!» (4)
- Good lecturer!» (5)

Week 4

17. Background/Foreground Analysis (Andrew Telles)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 50%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- I have difficulties following. Very intense slides as well as representation from lecturer.» (2)

Week 5

18. Degunkification and Rights Management (Andrew Telles)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 50%
3»0 0%
4»1 50%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I have difficulties following. Very intense slides as well as representation from lecturer.» (2)

Week 6

19. IP Platforms and Utilization Processes (Jens Bördin)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Interesting to hear a real life case!» (4)

Week 7

20. Licensing pt.1 (Ulf Petrusson)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Brought a lot of understanding.» (4)

Week 8

21. Licensing pt.2 (Ulf Petrusson)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 50%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Brought a lot of understanding. (However I think this was the lecture which was very delayed. Not OK!)» (4)

22. Design Thinking seminar (Karin Lersten)

1 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Did not attend» (?)
- Interesting!» (4)

23. Innovation Contracts Public/Private (Sara Dahlberg, Björn Skarp) pt.1

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 100%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Not very engaging. Very academia focused.» (3)

24. Contract Drafting seminar 1 (Caroline Pamp)

1 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Did not attend» (?)
- Good discussions. Increased my knowledge severely.» (4)

Week 9

25. Innovation Contracts Public/Private (Sara Dahlberg, Björn Skarp) pt.2

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 100%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Not very engaging. Very academia focused.» (3)

26. Negotiation Strategies 1 (Gregory Carson)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 50%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Why did we have this class?» (2)

Week 10

27. Negotiation Strategies 2 (Gregory Carson)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 50%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Why did we have this class?» (2)
- Interesting lecture!» (5)

28. Contract Drafting seminar 2 (Caroline Pamp)

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Good discussions. Increased my knowledge severely.» (4)

Study climate

29. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

2 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»2 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

30. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

2 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 50%
Very well»1 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

31. How was the course workload?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»1 50%
Too high»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

32. How was the total workload this study period?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»1 50%
Too high»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Summarizing questions

33. What is your general impression of the course?

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»1 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

34. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Leadership and negotiation lectures!»
- - Guest lecture from PRV, Caroling Pamp - "Toolbox" lectures from CIP PS»

35. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Include research project in gradings (if possible). Otherwise they take too much time, which I rather would like to spend on my individual assignments.»
- The Applied projects»

36. Additional comments

- EXAMINATION. I do not feel the assignments have showed what I have learnt in this course. Not good with three exact same set ups of examination. Would have preferred shorter assignments combined with oral presentations. TIMING. Projects started too late. PROJECT MGMT. Projects were badly managed from PL.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.5
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.62

Kursutvärderingssystem från