Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TM: Basic Stochastic Processes, MVE170

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-17 - 2013-01-07
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28%
Kontaktperson: Studienämnden Fysik»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

<15 hours/week»7 50%
Around 20 hours/week»5 35%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
Around 40 hours/week»1 7%
>50 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

- The other course we had (Electromagnetics) took most of my time!» (<15 hours/week)

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

14 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»3 21%
>75%»11 78%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

- Very good and very clear lectures!» (50-75%)

Teaching and course administration

3. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

4. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»9 64%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- It needs the combination of lectures to be of use.» (Large extent)

5. Was the course literature worth its price?

Do you consider that the course literature was worth its price? As a guideline the student union at Chalmers has set is at 70 sKr/hp.

14 svarande

1 (not worth it)»0 0%
0 0%
1 7%
2 14%
5 (well worth it)»11 78%
Did not buy the litterature»0

Genomsnitt: 4.71

- It doesn"t offer much in terms of intuition and understanding, but on the other hand is very cheap.» (4)
- It would have been nice with a book that is clearer on the applications of this theory. What we have now is mostly like a table of formulas and some examples.» (4)
- Kort on koncis. Skönt med bok som inte ordbajsar.» (5 (well worth it))

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»6 42%
Very well»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Loads of course mails! why not use the wep page to a greater extent ?» (Rather badly)
- The numerous and long course mails annoyed me slightly. Would it be alright to put the messages on the course web page instead?» (Rather well)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 28%
Very good»8 57%
I did not seek help»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Excellent! I asked questions almost every lecture and always got great answers.» (Very good)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 21%
Very well»8 57%
I did not seek cooperation»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 4

9. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

1 (Too low)»0 0%
6 42%
6 42%
2 14%
5 (Too high)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- I hardly studied at all until the last few days and still I was able to get through all of the recommended exercices. I appreciate this subject and think that this course would benefit from being slightly more ambitious.» (2)
- Very low compared the usual standard at F. » (2)

Summarizing questions

10. Do you think that the week of introduction (mainly revision) should be preserved?

- I did not attend it so for me personally it could be skipped, but I don"t know about the general level of probability theory knowledge.»
- Yes»
- Yes.»
- YES ! This must be preserved.»
- YES. Essential for my being able to put what I already knew in relation with the news in this course.»
- Yes, its always good to refresh old knowledge.»
- In some form, maybe just half a week?»

11. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

14 svarande

1 (not at all)»0 0%
1 7%
3 21%
7 50%
5 (very well)»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.85 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It was less theoretic than I expected, but still very fun and definitely made me hungry for more stochastic process courses! » (4)

12. How relevant is the course, considering your programme?

14 svarande

1 (Not relevant)»0 0%
2 14%
1 7%
3 21%
5 (Very relevant)»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.21 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I took it mostly out of personal interest.» (3)

13. What do you think about the computer tasks included in the course?

- Fun and not too hard, which is good since they don"t give credit anyway.»
- Very good»
- Good for understanding and for seeing how it would be used in applications.»
- They should be made mandatory sine they provide such understanding.»
- like»
- Very good.»
- If possible, I would like them to be mandatory hand-ins - that would make it easier to keep some continuity in studying this course.»
- They were good but some hints for how to solve them should be available for people who dont have done much computer programming.»
- Great, learned a lot from them, plus programming is always fun!»

14. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 14%
Good»9 64%
Excellent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- Great course!» (Good)
- Like it!» (Excellent)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Patrik Albin as lecturer.»
- the computational tasks.»
- Patrik»
- The lectures are very good and don"t need any changing.»
- Patrik»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Add excercise sessions where problems are solved on the board»
- Don"t know.»
- cut down on the course mails ?»
- Maybe new course literature, or at least additional handouts that give some "meat on the bone"»
- The computer tasks should be made hand-ins(with possible extra credits to the exam) to encourage students to actually do them. I would also like to see some exercise sessions with instructors to have te opportunity for even more help»
- Maybe up the pace a little bit, include some more theory.»

17. Additional comments

- Patrik rocks!»
- This course really made things bearable during an otherwise boring semester, thanks for that! »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.03

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.03
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från