ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Evaluation TME170 Powertrain Mechanics 2012, TME170

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-22 - 2013-01-20
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Daniel Dahl»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 6%
Around 20 hours/week»8 50%
Around 25 hours/week»5 31%
Around 30 hours/week»2 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

Matrisfråga

Lectures
16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 6%
75%»4 25%
100%»11 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.62

Assignments
15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»3 20%
50%»3 20%
75%»7 46%
100%»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 18%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 12%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- I recommend that each lecturer presents the goals of his lecture before he starts.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Don"t really know the goals.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»2 14%
To some extent»7 50%
Yes, definitely»5 35%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

- The exam was too demanding. The transmission picture was impossible to understand. I also recommend that if the exam is going to be of a calculating nature, there ought to be some problem solving sessions and not just assignments and lectures.» (No, not at all)
- I don"t think the exam reflected what the lecturer pointed out to be important during lectures.» (No, not at all)
- The exam questions are to deep compared to what is taught during the lectures. » (To some extent)
- Unclear questions in some cases e.g. Engine balancing» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»2 12%
Large extent»9 56%
Great extent»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. What did you think about the lectures?

Matrisfråga

- Jan Andersson, although he has the knowledge and can explain everything very well, he gave the most boring lectures.»
- If you know that you will only spend 1 hour in the course introduction, and the next lecture is at 15:15, then we should start at 14:15 and thus avoid the one-hour break that we had between 14:00 and 15:15. Also, the lectures from Jan Andersson are great in terms of problem solving, but lack a bit of a simple concept introduction. Something like "how stuff works", with videos or something like that. Finally, Anders Hedman is simply great!»

Daniel Dahl - Course Introduction
16 svarande

poor»1 6%
somewhat poor»1 6%
reasonable»6 37%
good»6 37%
excellent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

Arjan Helmantel - Engine components and configurations
16 svarande

poor»0 0%
somewhat poor»2 12%
reasonable»5 31%
good»7 43%
excellent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

Sven Andersson - Engine Balancing
16 svarande

poor»0 0%
somewhat poor»0 0%
reasonable»2 12%
good»7 43%
excellent»7 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.31

Anders Hedman - Conventional Transmissions
16 svarande

poor»0 0%
somewhat poor»0 0%
reasonable»0 0%
good»5 31%
excellent»11 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.68

Jan Andersson - Planetary transmissions
16 svarande

poor»1 6%
somewhat poor»3 18%
reasonable»6 37%
good»6 37%
excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

Anders Hedman - Clutch/Couplings
15 svarande

poor»0 0%
somewhat poor»0 0%
reasonable»3 20%
good»5 33%
excellent»7 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

Anders Hedman - DCT/CVT
15 svarande

poor»0 0%
somewhat poor»0 0%
reasonable»3 20%
good»6 40%
excellent»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

Sixten Berglund - Powertain installation
14 svarande

poor»1 7%
somewhat poor»1 7%
reasonable»2 14%
good»7 50%
excellent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

Jan Andersson - Differentials, AWD & AWD clutches
14 svarande

poor»0 0%
somewhat poor»5 35%
reasonable»2 14%
good»6 42%
excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

Mats Hilmersson - Hybrid Vehicles
15 svarande

poor»0 0%
somewhat poor»2 13%
reasonable»2 13%
good»9 60%
excellent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

8. What did you think about the assignments?

Matrisfråga

- Great assignments for learning.»
- The questions to be answered for each assignment could be clearer!»
- Assignments content were good but the way they were corrected and handled was extremely bad. Just locking at numerical values and not care about the way to them while correcting is not acceptable. We considered more parts and aspects in our calculations and got return for it because the value was not exactly the same as all others which had made more simplifications in the calculations. Questions and recommendations were sometimes vague which made some room for different interpretations which we made. This resulted in returns and big error just because we did not stand and ask the assistants about exactly how they interpreted the information. »

Assignment 1
16 svarande

poor»1 6%
somewhat poor»0 0%
reasonable»5 31%
good»7 43%
excellent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

Assignment 2
16 svarande

poor»1 6%
somewhat poor»0 0%
reasonable»0 0%
good»10 62%
excellent»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

Assignment 3
16 svarande

poor»1 6%
somewhat poor»0 0%
reasonable»2 12%
good»10 62%
excellent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Matrisfråga

- If there is more facts about a subject in Heisler than what is brought up in class could be told to us so that we can learn more if we want. »

Lecture slides
16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 12%
Large extent»12 75%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

Heisler: Vehicle and Engine Technology
15 svarande

Small extent»8 53%
Some extent»4 26%
Large extent»3 20%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»11 68%
Very well»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- Ping pong works well.» (Rather well)
- We could get more feedback from the assignments in ping-pong.» (Rather well)
- Would have been nice to get the lecture notes before lectures.» (Rather well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Matrisfråga

- For assignments they did not answer the questions we sent in by mail at all. So we asked on next assignment lecture but still no response....»

General
16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 25%
Very good»11 68%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

Assignments
16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»2 12%
Very good»13 81%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 25%
Very well»12 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

13. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»14 87%
High»2 12%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

14. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 50%
High»7 43%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 18%
Good»11 68%
Excellent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Well stated learning goals are needed (such as Sven Anderssons). The exam did not really reflect the course/lectures - problem solving sessions needed.» (Adequate)
- Except the assignments which were badly handled by the assistants.» (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Engine balancing.»
- Assignments.»
- Assignment 2 and 3 but with clearer questions. Anders Hedmans lectures!»
- Course content OK»
- Lecture by Anders Headman.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The goals!»
- Powertrain installation and hybrid vehicles lectures do not seem usefull.»
- Jan Anderssons lectures are very heavy and a lot of pictures out of Heisler which is very hard to understand. Sixtens lecture was to general, it could be much deeper!»
- The way to treat and correct assignment. Why not just look a little bit more on the way towards the answer instead of just checking the numerical value of the answer. Assistants should respond to questions sent to them, which they get paid for answering...»
- Since we should be able to do calculations on different subjects there should be time and questions available to exercise on these. »
- A clearer picture of the gearbox on the exam»
- Goals of assignment one could have been clearer.»

18. Additional comments

- Physical demonstration models are a great support for the students in order to understand the function of each system. An automatic gearbox would have been nice for next year.»
- Question paper was too lengthy. Dint find time to think and attend few questions »
- This course should have been introduced in the first year(Term IV) of the MSC. Automotive Programme since it plays a major role in helping students decide on the field to pursue in their future careers.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.93
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.93
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.73

Kursutvärderingssystem från