ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Marine Structural Engineering, MMA131

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-03-05 - 2008-04-24
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Jonas Ringsberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 20%
Around 20 hours/week»2 40%
Around 25 hours/week»2 40%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 40%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

3. How large part of the tutorials offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 20%
100%»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 60%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- There was a very big difference between the exercises and the examination. The previous exams given like representative wer NOT AT ALL representative. » (To some extent)
- To little time on the exam, to much text, the problems could be more clear » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. To what extent has the tutorials been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 20%
Rather well»3 60%
Very well»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

12. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

13. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 80%
High»1 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- The first part with Anders was very bad explained but the second part was pretty good.» (Adequate)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- jonas ringsbergs lectures was very good» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The Anders course»
- More time on the exam»

17. Additional comments

Questions on the different parts of the course

18. What did you think of the lectures in engineering beam theory (Anders Ulfvarson)

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»1 20%
Acceptable»2 40%
Good»1 20%
Very good»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Anders has a very interesting background but his course is bad organised and explained.» (Bad)

19. What did you think of the lectures in reliability-based methods (Jonas Ringsberg)

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»1 20%
Very good»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

20. What did you think about the tutorials in engineering beam theory (Per Hogström)

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

21. What did you think about the tutorials in reliability-based methods (Jonas Ringsberg)

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»0 0%
Good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

22. Was it a good combination of lecures and tutorials?

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Acceptable»1 20%
Good»3 60%
Very good»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

23. Did you buy the litterature?

5 svarande

No»0 0%
Yes»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 2

Kursutvärderingssystem från