ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Experimental physics: spectroscopic methods TIF060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-29 - 2012-11-07
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 54%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 16%
Around 25 hours/week»2 33%
Around 30 hours/week»2 33%
At least 35 hours/week»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 16%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 16%
100%»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- There was only an introduction lecture.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- One of this course"s main focuses is error analysis, but we haven"t studied error analysis at all (we have studied statistics but it is not the same thing). As a matter of fact we are still struggling with the error analysis since one of our reports was rejected! Also, our knowledge of solid state physics was inadequate to comprehend one of the labs which we did. » (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»1 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- There was no examination in this course. Just reports.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»5 83%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.16

- There were no lectures except for the introduction.» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»3 50%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»1 16%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- There was no course material. This is an experimental course.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 66%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 83%
I did not seek help»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 16%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»2 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- a student (emma) didn"t show up to our labs » (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 50%
High»1 16%
Too high»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- It was to high because we didn"t understand what we were doing. It was mainly our lack of understanding of error analysis which was the problem.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»1 16%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- But this was my own fault, I took three instead of two courses.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»2 33%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The feedback on the reports.»
- The nice supervisors!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe remove the ethics paper...»
- Either lower the standards for the error analysis or provide us with more material on the subject. There was some material on the course"s web page but it wasn"t nearly enough. Just a few hours ago me and my group had to go and ask the supervisor of one of our labs how we should handle the error analysis in the report which was rejected!»
- A bit less workload would be good. For example don"t recommend to take data for the fifth time and/or the fifth sample if it is not really necessary.»

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.5
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.62

Kursutvärderingssystem från