ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Bioscience Intellectual Property Strategies - SA, MED983

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-23 - 2012-10-30
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 16%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 25%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- 3 hour lectures could easily have been done in 2 hours. Many times I got frustrated as I felt that I was wasting studying and reading time. There was a lot of repetition within lectures and off topic conversations... » (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- Missed one or two lectures» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 33%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 66%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 66%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»3 75%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 75%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 25%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Ping pong is a mess, you never know where to find the information. Sometimes its in emails, sometimes in new messages, sometimes in documents, sometimes its a link in the google calendar... We need one place where all the handouts are posted. » (Rather badly)

Specific lectures

It is also useful for us if you can provide feedback on specific lectures, whether in terms of content, administration or other aspects. This helps us learn which lectures to include, which lecture formats are most appreciated, and allows us to communicate results to our external lecturers, who are almost always interested in hearing how their lecture went. Try to comment on as many lectures as you can.

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lecturers:

Week 1

9. Introduction to patents and patent law (Jannice Käll)

4 svarande

1»1 25%
2»2 50%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

10. Patents to regulate openness (Ulf Petrusson)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 50%
5»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

11. The patent as a tool for claiming innovations (Henrik Olsson, AB Volvo)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 33%
3»0 0%
4»1 33%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. Patent Exercises (Emil Winkler)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 25%
4»2 50%
5»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

Week 2

13. Intro to Copyright and Copyright law (Erik Ullberg, Wistrand)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 66%
4»0 0%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

14. Virtual/Soft Products (Jannice Käll)

3 svarande

1»1 33%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»1 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

15. Databases and biobanks (Boo Edgar)

4 svarande

1»2 50%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

- Confusing, not very clear» (3)

16. Copyright exercises (Jannice Käll)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 33%
5»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

17. Music IP Management (Emil Winkler)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 25%
4»1 25%
5»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

18. Bigger picture part1 (Lars Andersson)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 25%
5»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

Week 3

19. Intro Trademarks and domain names (Pernilla Book, Sara Backman, MSA)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 25%
4»2 50%
5»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

20. Market regulations within biotech (Boo Edgar)

4 svarande

1»1 25%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»1 25%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

21. Intro Design rights (Pernilla Book, Sara Backman, MSA)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 25%
4»1 25%
5»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

22. Applied Trademark Law (Ann-Charlotte Söderlund Björk, Gozzo Advokater)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»1 25%
5»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

23. Introduction to the field of brand management (Lars Andersson)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 25%
5»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

24. Trademark and design analysis (Lars Andersson)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

25. Trademark and design exercises (Lars Andersson)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 25%
5»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

26. Bigger picture part 2 (Lars Andersson)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 25%
5»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

Week 4

27. Introduction to resource-based theory and intellectual asset management (IAM), part I (Jonas Lindgren)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 33%
3»0 0%
4»2 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

28. Introduction to resource-based theory and intellectual asset management (IAM), part 2 (Jonas Lindgren)

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 25%
3»2 50%
4»1 25%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

29. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 75%
Very good»1 25%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

30. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»2 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

31. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 25%
Adequate»1 25%
High»2 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Not enough time to complete assessments. A lot of lectures where cancelled, and rescheduled but assignments were kept as they were. This me ants that we had to stay sometimes from 8 am till midnight to work on group work. This is not an efficient way of working and many times I felt frustrated as I felt that we were not able to complete the work to our standards because of the lack of time. » (High)

32. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 50%
High»2 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Summarizing questions

33. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»3 75%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Most lectures where very useful and interesting, however the time management and schedule are very poorly organised. » (Good)

34. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lars andersson.. Focus on strategies not the legal grounds..»
- The exercises and the lectures by Lars»
- The exercises »
- The exercises. And Lars!»

35. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Boo edgar needs to be more precise. »
- 2 hour lectures instead of 3, give us the important info, don"t go off track, and no repetition. I would rather sit in an interesting 2 hour lecture than falling asleep in a 3 hour lecture and getting frustrated. Seminars are not very useful. I would replace them with something more practical. »
- Raise the bar regarding the English skills of students and teachers. Also raise the bar so that lectures actually have a lecture on the topic they"re supposed to instead of having a million slides and improvising poorly.»

36. Additional comments

- -»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.75
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.75
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.68

Kursutvärderingssystem från