ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Molecular biology 1, KMG036, sp 1, 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-15 - 2012-11-04
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 53%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Bioteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 28%

Around 20 hours/week» 2 28%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 28%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 1 14%

75%» 3 42%

100%» 3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 14%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 3 42%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 5 83%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all» 1 16%

To some extent» 0 0%

Yes, definitely» 5 83%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 1 14%

Large extent» 2 28%

Great extent» 4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent» 2 28%

Some extent» 1 14%

Large extent» 3 42%

Great extent» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 2 28%

Rather well» 3 42%

Very well» 2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 5 71%

Very good» 1 14%

I did not seek help» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 3 42%

Very well» 3 42%

I did not seek cooperation» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 28%

High» 5 71%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 71%

High» 1 14%

Too high» 1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 14%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 3 42%

Excellent» 3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Cancer topics»
- The content of the course and all the different lecturers.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Teachers should be able to upload files on the Chalmers student portal, not only on the GU file system.»
- Clashing courses. »
- More labs.»
- NPC topic mode of teaching should be reviewed»
- Some lectures could be clearer as they mix names of different homologus proteins in a way that makes it very hard to follow. Also the labboratory excercise should be looked over sice no one got the results the assistants got.»
- Perhaps an extra seminar would help.»

16. Additional comments

- Worthless to learn names on proteins and exactly how they interact in terms of which amino acid gets phosphorylated etc. »
- Overall an excellent course that I will recommend to other masterstudents at chalmers!»
- For the cell regulation cycle lecture series, I felt that the description of the overall mechanism (top-down view), and especially the interplay with signalling, was done a bit sketchy. It would have been helpful to have one big (detailed) picture which would have been referred to throughout the series.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.14

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.14
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.78

Kursutvärderingssystem från