ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEPO 1213-1 Applied Computational Electromagnetics, EEK221

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-10-26 - 2012-11-08
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»1 20%
Around 30 hours/week»1 20%
At least 35 hours/week»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 20%
100%»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 25%
Yes, definitely»3 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 80%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

9. Comments about teaching and course administration

- Actually, this course was nice in a way that every participating student contributed to information exchange. Each student shared the results of analysis made on the topics he received during a course. Personally, I find this very expeditious, efficient and educative.»
- I want to congratulate Yuriy for a nice job both in teaching and in course administration.»

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»5 100%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

13. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
High»3 60%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 40%
Excellent»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- All the topics elaborated in the course.»
- The course structure and all people involved.»
- The assignments»
- The way the course was organized, with assignments, a seminar and a project. »

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I understand that this course was just a complementary part of the study term and I would give the course work load distribution as 30% to 70%: former for this course and latter for course project (Power Engineering Design Project). Thus I cannot claim for some changes in the course but still I think we could have been given more detailed or even extended lectures on electric and magnetic fields.»
- Powerpoint slides and handouts could be revised and upgraded so they become more structured so that may become easier to follow»
- Start with the project and computer exercise earlier»
- Perhaps the project could be introduced earlier than the last week, so that more time could be spent on it.»

17. Additional comments

- Congratulations once again for a course of very good value which facilitates hands-on experience with industry leading multiphysics tool.»
- Great course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från