ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

ARK131 Matter, space, structure 2, 11/12, ARK131

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-07 - 2012-05-20
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Birgit Modh»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

1. One question about the course in general*

Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of this statement, where
1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement
5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement

Matrisfråga

The general impression is that the course was very good*
10 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 20%

3» 1 10%

4» 6 60%

5» 1 10%

I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. Five questions about the course

Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where
1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement
5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement

Matrisfråga

- Out of the two possible projects, I did the full-year project at Guldheden.»
- The examination did not connect mentionably with sustainable thinking and cradle to cradle, which was a majority of the programme.»

It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were
10 svarande

1» 1 10%

2» 4 40%

3» 2 20%

4» 2 20%

5» 1 10%

I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.8

The examination and the aims of the course were well related
10 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 2 20%

3» 3 30%

4» 3 30%

5» 2 20%

I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

The course was very well administered
10 svarande

1» 4 40%

2» 3 30%

3» 2 20%

4» 1 10%

5» 0 0%

I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 2

I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education
10 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 4 40%

4» 2 20%

5» 4 40%

I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 4

The course demanded a high degree of work effort
10 svarande

1» 0 0%

2» 1 10%

3» 1 10%

4» 4 40%

5» 4 40%

I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 4.1

3. What elements of the course should definitely remain?

- The workshop we had during the studio was extremely giving and it or something similar should definitely remain.»
- Cooperation with - in this case - Riksbyggen was interesting, could have been more incorporated in the end phase besides just the critiques. Interesting project scenario. »
- Presentations for riksbyggen»
- freedom in the design style»

4. Were there any elements missing in the course?

- Lack of information, clear instructions and goals!»
- Lectures and seminars. Seminars were later added, at the students" initiative but could have been even more beneficial had they been planned from the very beginning. A large studio-wide workshop around a common theme/material, like there have been in earlier years. »
- Concept and material workshops»

5. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?

- The administration, clearer guidelines.»
- More lectures/seminars. Better administration - information at first didn"t reach all students, no formal schedule was set at the beginning of the course, it was unclear until the last few weeks exactly WHAT we were supposed to turn in. Having that information (clear outcome & set schedule that could - of course - be tweaked if necessary) at the very beginning of the project would have reduced stress in a major way.»
- I think the research part of the project is a good idea, but the support from the teaching team for that part were very insufficient. »
- More time for the project to achieve it more.»

6. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?

If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)

Matrisfråga

- There should be an assistent taking care of the administration and distribution of information, since the head teacher won"t listen to critique and has problems giving a clear answer to questions! The stress is also enhanced by the lack of information and unclear guidelines»

Lectures
10 svarande

-» 2 40%

OK» 3 60%

+» 0 0%

++» 0 0%

Not relevant / I dont know» 5

Genomsnitt: 1.6

Exercises
10 svarande

-» 0 0%

OK» 4 40%

+» 4 40%

++» 2 20%

Not relevant / I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Workshops
10 svarande

-» 1 11%

OK» 3 33%

+» 0 0%

++» 5 55%

Not relevant / I dont know» 1

Genomsnitt: 3

Project work
10 svarande

-» 0 0%

OK» 1 10%

+» 3 30%

++» 6 60%

Not relevant / I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Ask questions
10 svarande

-» 0 0%

OK» 1 12%

+» 5 62%

++» 2 25%

Not relevant / I dont know» 2

Genomsnitt: 3.12

Hand -ins
10 svarande

-» 0 0%

OK» 3 30%

+» 5 50%

++» 2 20%

Not relevant / I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.9

Examination
10 svarande

-» 0 0%

OK» 3 33%

+» 3 33%

++» 3 33%

Not relevant / I dont know» 1

Genomsnitt: 3

Team work
10 svarande

-» 1 10%

OK» 4 40%

+» 3 30%

++» 2 20%

Not relevant / I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.6

Independent work
10 svarande

-» 0 0%

OK» 1 10%

+» 6 60%

++» 3 30%

Not relevant / I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Occasions with critique (feedback)
10 svarande

-» 2 20%

OK» 0 0%

+» 5 50%

++» 3 30%

Not relevant / I dont know» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.9

Guest lectures
10 svarande

-» 1 16%

OK» 3 50%

+» 2 33%

++» 0 0%

Not relevant / I dont know» 4

Genomsnitt: 2.16

External study visits
10 svarande

-» 1 16%

OK» 4 66%

+» 0 0%

++» 1 16%

Not relevant / I dont know» 4

Genomsnitt: 2.16

Other element
8 svarande

-» 1 33%

OK» 2 66%

+» 0 0%

++» 0 0%

Not relevant / I dont know» 5

Genomsnitt: 1.66

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.6

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.6
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från