ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPALG 1112-4 Compiler construction, TDA282|DIT380

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-23 - 2012-05-29
Antal svar: 24
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Opening question

1. Which university do you belong to?

Some of our courses are taken jointly by students of the University of Gothenburg and Chalmers University of Technology. In order for us to be able to look at the answers of each student group separately, we would like you to indicate which university you are registered at.

23 svarande

University of Gothenburg» 1 4%

Chalmers University of Technology» 22 95%

Genomsnitt: 1.95

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

24 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 2 8%

Around 20 hours/week» 8 33%

Around 25 hours/week» 10 41%

Around 30 hours/week» 3 12%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

24 svarande

0%» 4 16%

25%» 1 4%

50%» 5 20%

75%» 8 33%

100%» 6 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- Saddly couldn"t go to any classes and had to prepare myself.» (0%)
- I work full-time» (0%)
- Good lectures, missed last lectures due to time constraint» (75%)
- Good lectures. Perhaps consider adding some more guest lectures - the one we had was interesting.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

To review the learning outcomes for this course, click here. (Opens in new window)

4. How understandable are the course goals?

23 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 4%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 3 13%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 19 82%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

23 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 4%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 21 91%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Taking a stab on security tranformations (for example SSP) would improve the course» (No, the goals are set too low)

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all» 1 4%

To some extent» 4 18%

Yes, definitely» 17 77%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Didn"t finish the course» (?)
- But projekt clearly spoke for it self» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent» 4 16%

Some extent» 7 29%

Large extent» 9 37%

Great extent» 4 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- I did not attend it.» (Small extent)
- disregarding lecture notes, of course. They were of good quality.» (Small extent)
- Didn"t attend the lecture» (Small extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent» 7 31%

Some extent» 8 36%

Large extent» 4 18%

Great extent» 3 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

- Dont own a copy. Plt course and lectures most important» (Small extent)
- Good for theoretical knowledge but didn"t help so much for the project» (Small extent)
- Could have used more details on some parts, especially the usage of type [i32, [0 x %arr]] which was difficult to find specification on what it really means. » (Some extent)
- Really useful slides :D» (Large extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

24 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 9 37%

Very well» 15 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Web page down some Sundays» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

24 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 4%

Rather good» 4 16%

Very good» 12 50%

I did not seek help» 7 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.04

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

24 svarande

Very poorly» 1 4%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 2 8%

Very well» 14 58%

I did not seek cooperation» 7 29%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

- I am working so I don"t meet other students usually» (I did not seek cooperation)

12. How was the course workload?

24 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 4%

Adequate» 20 83%

High» 2 8%

Too high» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- I love how the workload depends on your objectives» (Adequate)
- it"s very nice that the mandatory parts are not to much but you can extend quite much if you want to» (Adequate)
- I usually have no problem combine work and study. I am very comited to what I do but this course I couldn"t manage. There was too little information in the project description. The description of the problem and language was good but there was no little hint on how to start the program. Structure tips,... When I looked on internet how to do I found other compiler courses homepages with some skeleton. I thought about using it but it would have been cheating. To me the project description should have provided some program skeleton/tips.» (Too high)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 16 69%

High» 4 17%

Too high» 3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- Together with Parallel functional programming.» (Adequate)
- When I dropped the compiler course I just have the parallel distributed and real-time system which was really good and a good workload.» (Adequate)
- Three courses, though not to hard to manage.» (High)
- Tought with two project courses at the same time. I also took the course "Artificial Intelligence".» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

24 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 4%

Adequate» 1 4%

Good» 9 37%

Excellent» 13 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.41 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good for students which have times and are already good in compiler technology. Very hard when what you read in the project description is "here is the language, here is the target, write a compiler"» (Fair)
- Some extensions in the project description could have been a bit more clear.» (Good)
- Got more from it than expected» (Good)
- Very fun to do a project! Good slides, nice lab instructions and you can easily get help from teachers» (Excellent)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project style of the course»
- The overall structure of the course.»
- Overall great course and great lectures.»
- The project!»
- The evaluation system, really cool.»
- The project!»
- Contents of lectures (slides was very helpful for the project) The project and the way it was structured (2 parts and optional extensions).»
- lab work.»
- The course format was very good.»
- The entire course as is»
- Lab-based course»
- The lecture slides where really good in my opinion.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More choices for lab extensions»
- I feel like the credit-system could be more dynamic. Some extensions were clearly more complicated than others.»
- Maybe try to shorten the project description and clarify some details in the extensions for llvm.»
- -»
- Nothing»
- None.»
- People are lazy, force some of the extra creds! Otherwise plt has covered a great part of compiler cons! »
- Can"t think of anything. A bit more freely available information on how to implement arrays in LLVM would have been helpful.»
- I have no idea how many people followed this course or dropped it but in order to be accessible to all students. Maybe more guidance and why not some compiler program skeletons like the one I found on other compiler course homepages.»

17. Additional comments

- Perhaps the first part of the course could be removed so there could be more focus on LLVM.»
- -»
- Thanks for the course, it was really cool!»
- Some more guest lectures. Have them talk about the actual compiler implementation as well!»
- Best course I"ve read in a long time. Educational and loads of fun.»
- This seemed like a very interesting course. Too bad I couldn"t do it.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.41

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.41
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.85

Kursutvärderingssystem från