|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
ARK347 - v12 - Architectural conservationStatus: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-05-16 - 2012-05-31 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 84% Kontaktperson: Roberto Cattaneo» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp
Learning outcomesWith "learning outcomes" we mean the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expected to reach.After course ARK347, students should be able to - Make an inventory of buildings and environment - Describe and analyze characteristics out of architectural, technical, historical, cultural, functional and resource aspects - Produce drawings as foundation for continued planning of restoration, transformation and rebuilding, and search for information in archives and literature - Accomplish an inspection of damages and interpret them out of (historical) techniques and other investigations - Inquire and communicate the wishes and needs of managers, authorities, users and other stake-holders - Understand the concepts of restoration and rebuilding - Know and reflect on restoration/renewal ideas, historically and today in local, national and international perspectives - Describe, analyze and balance different values, shortcomings, needs and possibilities in the building and environment - Make a program for renewal of a building on basis of acquired knowledge and understanding about the building itself and the opinions and needs of stakeholders - Give ideas and sketch proposals for conceptual solutions, and visualize and communicate them with other students, experts, clients and stakeholders - Design a project of architectural conservation and development, with regard to historical, cultural, functional, technical and resource considerations - Perform, visualize and describe a full proposal for restoration and renewal 1. How do you think the learning outcome has been pursued during this course?*11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.81 - There were too little input in the begining of the course. More lecture and seminare in the beggining would be better.» (Sufficiently) 2. Are the learning outcomes reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?*11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.75 - I feel like we missed a lot of imoprtant information due to the lack of lectures. (Mabye because there were too few people that would hold the lectures in english?)» (No, they are too elementar) 3. Are the learning outcomes reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?*11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.63 Education and course administration4. What support have you got for your learning from...*Matrisfråga- Although it was nice to be introduced to many different books and articles, it would have been hard to read them all. As it were now, you at least have an idea of which ones you would like to read in the future.» Lectures*
Genomsnitt: 2 Literature*
Genomsnitt: 2.54 Studies on site (Lyckholm)*
Genomsnitt: 3.09 Study visits*
Genomsnitt: 3.09 Seminars*
Genomsnitt: 2.09 Tutoring*
Genomsnitt: 2.45 5. Think about the amount of the parts componing the course. Do you think they are...*Matrisfråga- Smaller design exercises would have been nice in the beginning, like daysketches of specific parts of the building (new windows, entrance etc.), sad we never went with Peter Christenssen to Lyckholms.» Lectures*
Genomsnitt: 1.27 Literature*
Genomsnitt: 1.72 Assignments*
Genomsnitt: 2.27 Study visits*
Genomsnitt: 2 Seminars*
Genomsnitt: 1.9 Tutoring chances*
Genomsnitt: 1.9 6. How did the course organisation (information, schedule, homepage, handing-in) function?*11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.27 - Roberto did a very good job! but the course in general was really unorganist» (Very badly) 7. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?*11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.9 - Roberto did a good job and it was always possible to reach him, but hard to reach another teacher» (Rather bad) Work environment8. How was the possibility of using Chalmers equipment (computers, rooms, carpentry, etc.)?*11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.81 - There was not computers for everyone and it could be difficult to find places where the whole group could sit and work together.» (Rather bad) 9. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?*11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - We should have the possibilities to choose group
By our selves» (Rather bad) Concluding questions10. What is your overall opinion of the course?*11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - I am not sure I would take this course again, it wasn"t good organised, especially in the first part I felt lost» (Passed) 11. What should be preserved next year?*- The overall idea of the course is very interesting, study visits, work in the cite, working in small groups, possibly 2-3 people, tutoring, the idea to explore the local context»- The first SWOT-analysis» - the study visits» - study visits» - Site visits, tutoring.» - the assistant roberto was very helpful and made an effort to ensure a good working climate » - Measuring, I can not believe we have not learned that before. Se the above. (nr. 10)» - Measuring assignment, photogrammetry assignment, all the study visits, literature seminars. Possibilities to have tutoring by engineer K-G Olsson.» - the studyvisits.» - Roberto was a great assistent, study visits, measuring week» - Study visits» 12. What should be changed next year?*- If you are more interested in the big image of the area you should be given the option to fallow it, in case other is more in to construction detail planning then that will require more literature, or possibility to work in a group interested in the same matter. More lectures at the start of the course»- no study visits when it´,s to cold or very rainy. You don´,t listen much, you just want to work indoors at those times» - the organisation in a global way and the schedule for the semester : it should give more time for the design than the analyse part.» - the teacher, better organisation, too much time for first parts, too less time and assistence for indepth part. » - Less time for analyse, more for indepth. It became way to stressfull to finish a project in time in 3,5 weeks.» - more lectures in the beginning of the course clearer instruction what the difference between the 4 different steps is (especially 1 and 2) and what the assignment is better organisation of the tutorings » - Set a schedule and keep it, for everyones sake. It is fine to have some time after the presentation to correct minor faults, but it should be on the schedule! Se the above. (nr. 10)» - Assignment 1 and 2 (merge them), cross-critique by students should be included in the final critique, more scheduled time in the beginning of the semester.» - less swot and more lectures. have a possibility to change group when you choose your in depth project. have more time for part four. where did bengt disapear? more connection between part one and the rest. more lectures in the begining of the cours. don´,t let the swedish speaking students act as translators for the rest of the group. higher quality of english from the teacher. more respect for the students and their time. if there should be possibilities to do corrections after final presentation, let the students know that befor the presentation. if you cooperate with a company, like this time peab, be more clear in which role they are going to play. (As for now we expected them to take part in our project, but they were only interested in marketing their company.) » - better organisation, better support for the teacher (she seemed a bit lost)» - More lectures and information in the beginning» 13. Other comments- more lectures in the beginning, not at the end. do not have 2 swot analysis. one is enough to many assignment - combine and make fewer for next year more lectures about concervation, less about beer»- course desription was obviously not clear enough » - Flexibility is a good thing but too much change is stressful and irritating. Some things, like what is expected to be handed in, should be set in stone from the beginning. Examples. The legal plan, if it would have been more clear in the beginning of the course that we should discuss it, that would have been an excellent thing to do when a study visit had to be moved to another date or something of sorts. Plans and scale, When we wanted to show more detail in our plans we changed the scale and that was fine. If you know from the start what the end result is expected to be, you can use the first parts of the studio to support the final one without having to remake them. That is just a waste of precious time.» - I feel that the teacher had too strong opinions on conservation and that we should have the same opinions, that the teacher had to many opinions on our design work (which isn´,t the way, according to me, to give good critique). The language was also a problem as the english communication did not work out that fine all the time. There were also no information that we were suppose to do changes in the project after final hand-in, this seem to be something made up during the critique session (when another teacher mentioned it). The final critique felt a bit unprofessional and not serious, the room was awful as well as the ventilation couldn´,t handle us. Keeping time didn´,t exist at all it felt like.» - Make the students cooperate between themselves more. It felt like a competition!» * obligatoriska frågor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9%