ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Applied nuclear engineering, TIF195, Q3, 12

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-12 - 2012-03-25
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 21%
Around 25 hours/week»6 42%
Around 30 hours/week»4 28%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 26%
100%»11 73%

Genomsnitt: 4.73

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 60%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 15%
Yes, definitely»10 76%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- There is no exam on this course.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 40%
Large extent»6 40%
Great extent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- The lectures before the exercises should be more theory and not focus on the practical of the exercises.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»2 13%
Some extent»6 40%
Large extent»6 40%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- No literature, and I think that is bad, there should be a compendium summary of all the topics.» (Small extent)
- Very little literature used, bad question.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 6%
Rather well»8 53%
Very well»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- All lectures and exercises material should be available before it takes place. » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 40%
Very good»9 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 13%
Rather well»5 33%
Very well»8 53%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The random exercise pairs may not always work.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»7 46%
High»7 46%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Perfect» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»6 42%
High»6 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»8 53%
Excellent»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The teachers could be quicker in correcting the assignments so that one gets feedback for the remaining assignments so that one can improve the methods of learning» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Monte-Carlo, Transient analysis, PSA and most probably the reactor simulation exercise. »
- The structure should be kept.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- SEMCON exercise should be laid out so you don"t necessarily have to be there to get the points.»
- The second exercise of the course - the one with both fatigue and CFD calculationns. CFD is important of course and should be kept, but the fatigue exercises could be removed completely. »
- Some of the guest lecturer was not good at all.»

16. Additional comments

- tinghouse should be invited on an exercise, perhaps core calculations?»
- It feels unfair that some people aces the assignments by co-working on after school hours. This means that people doing the assignments on their own have a very hard time checking their report before turning them in. By the way, is it really smart to let students attend the reactor safety course before this one? This gives them an unfair advantage. The study trips were great and westinghouse should be invited on an exercise, perhaps core calculations?» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.33
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.33
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.83

Kursutvärderingssystem från