ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Idea evaluation and feasibility studies Sahlgrenska, MED982

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-12 - 2012-04-05
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»1 25%
Around 30 hours/week»3 75%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Hard to know if it was 25-30» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 75%
100%»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Had to skip some luctures due to lack of time.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 25%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 75%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Sometimes lack of good examples of how to use analysis methods etc. course litterature.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 50%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Ping Pong was painfully slow... unsure as to why» (Rather badly)

Lectures

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined compentency and pedagogy of the following lectures:

9. Mats Lundqvist

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 25%
4»2 50%
5»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Good, but sometimes too abstract and not very concrete. Hard to relate to cases. Would have been good with examples of how this relates to real cases.» (3)

10. Boo Edgar

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 50%
5»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

11. David Andersson

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 50%
5»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

12. Per Lundin (ThomsonReuters)

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»3 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

13. Sverker Alänge

4 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 25%
3»1 25%
4»1 25%
5»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Did not understand his red thread trough the lecture.» (2)

14. Christopher Hedvall

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»2 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Only had short lecture - can"t really judge.» (3)

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»3 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Could have been scheduled time slots when to get guidance on cases.» (Rather good)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»2 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Very well most of the time, but with particualrly one person expectations did not match and communication were not very good....» (Rather well)

17. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»3 75%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

18. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 50%
High»2 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 75%
Excellent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Real cases and change of groups from fish case to others.»
- 2 real cases»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Deeper introduction, perhaps exam/dugga on theoretical idea evaluation before real cases.»
- The lectures. Lectures were not coherent with the goal of the course, and were lacking focus. Although workshops in lectures were very good»

22. Additional comments

- Fun to work with real cases!!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.25
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.25
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.81

Kursutvärderingssystem från