ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Surface and nanophysics, TIF120

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-09 - 2012-03-25
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 42%
Around 20 hours/week»3 42%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 42%
100%»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»1 16%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»3 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 57%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 57%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- mostly articles found on the web.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- handouts could have been put up on the homepage.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 14%
Very good»5 71%
I did not seek help»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The pupils were encouraged to go to teachers and ask questions which was very good» (Very good)
- Good help with the projects» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 14%
Rather well»1 14%
Very well»5 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 71%
High»2 28%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is for me a good way of learning to do projects.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the projects»
- the examination form, projects are a very nice way for an examination in this course. »
- The projects, Igors commitment to the subject. The different approach that the different teachers offered»
- The projects»
- Projects as examination. It lets you learn in your own way.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe devide the presentations in two groups, hard to put attention to all of them.»
- the content of each lecture could be smaller. There is so much information from each lecture and are quite poorly described which just confuses rather than help you understand.»
- The time planning. Many lecturesd carried on way too long»
- The scheldue. Maybe have two lectures instead of one long. And maybe have some extra time planned for the presentations since it took a lot of over time.»
- Having separate time for the presentation. It is not ok to have the lectures be more than what is states in the schedual,much better to have these seperate, or have lecture-time that covers the time that is needed.»

16. Additional comments

- split it in two lecture-sessions per week»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.14
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.14
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.78

Kursutvärderingssystem från