ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Intellectual Property and Innovation Strategies, TEK350

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-02-29 - 2012-03-07
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 26%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 4 28%

Around 20 hours/week» 6 42%

Around 25 hours/week» 4 28%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 1 7%

75%» 7 50%

100%» 6 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 4 28%

The goals are difficult to understand» 2 14%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 3 21%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 5 35%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- Nevertheless it is kinda difficult to figure out what has to be known fr the exam!» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 11 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 2 15%

Yes, definitely» 1 7%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 10 76%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 5 35%

Large extent» 5 35%

Great extent» 4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- Unclear structure and bad communication» (Some extent)
- the last lectures were very helpful» (Some extent)
- Very bad coordination between the different people lecturing» (Some extent)
- Some lecturers have been better to provide a good understanding than others. The first lectures about patent, trademark and copyright was not helping as much as the last ones. » (Some extent)
- Varies » (Great extent)
- Don"t like to have many different professors. Would be good to only have the examiner throughout the whole course. Maybe a few guest lectures but not for the whole course.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent» 4 28%

Some extent» 9 64%

Large extent» 0 0%

Great extent» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- Bad book! » (Small extent)
- Compendium is very helpful but the actual course book is not relevant at all for the laws we are discussing. » (Some extent)
- The "Intellectual Property"-book was not good at all. The legal compendium on the other hand was good» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly» 3 21%

Rather badly» 3 21%

Rather well» 2 14%

Very well» 6 42%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- really hard to follow the course information with lots of different lectures.» (Very badly)
- Documents were handed out on different places. Very hard to see what documents were new and which were old. » (Very badly)
- I do not like pingpong. The couse administration has not been great. Too confusing and the thing with documents in both post and under the document tab is one example. Think through the course next time and be clearer about course content and the purpose. I don"t see the meaning with the wednesday cases. Would have been better to have e.g. lecturers at monday (and not by people from the industry), go through an exam question at wednesdays in that subject, and then have the exercises at fridays. » (Very badly)
- The web page was very messy. Documents were hard to find.» (Rather badly)
- Needs more structure and organization! Have reading per week in a document stated. Also, important to put up the slides before class, which makes it easier to follow. » (Rather well)
- Pingpong worked great!» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 4 28%

Very good» 9 64%

I did not seek help» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 4 28%

Very well» 10 71%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 7%

Adequate» 9 64%

High» 4 28%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 7 50%

High» 6 42%

Too high» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 7%

Adequate» 4 28%

Good» 7 50%

Excellent» 2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- If the administration had been better, and the lectures followed a well defined path that could be understood from the beginning ot would have helped. E.g. the third to last lecture almost felt like we started over from the beginning again since they didn"t frame the course in a good way from the start.» (Fair)
- Very interesting course content, though is the course kind of confusing, especially the first part. » (Adequate)
- Very good course, surprisingly well directed whereas the course involves several different lectures. The lectures were held by experienced people in the field which made it one of the best courses I attended.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The mini-cases are a great help , they should be graded b/c they are a lot of work!»
- the last lecture was very good and specific.»
- The examiner is the best lecturer, keep him!»
- The cases helped a lot. »
- Expert lectures»
- The exercies both on Wedensdays and Fridays are really good! Especially that we have to present our findings in front of the whole class, I really liked to get the extra presentation exercise. It was also very nice to get the smaller cases on Wednesday and having to finish them in a few hours since we worked very efficiently and could go home afterwards. »
- The summing up lectures by Lars Andersson made everything a lot clearer and they should definitely be preserved.»
- The lectures held by different people from the field.»
- Lars Andersson, he was the best lecturer that summarized the whole course. I learned more on his three lectures than all the others together. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The name! I cannot really see how "innovation strategies" was integrated in the course. »
- Grade the minicases!»
- too many different lectures, hard to follow what was going on in the course in the beginning. there didn"t seem to be a thread in the course»
- Skip the Intellectual property book by Michael Spence. Poor!»
- A different book should be used.»
- It would be nice if the cases were more "real" involving real companies and real case scenarios»
- The Spence book, it should be okay to use the Swedish one too. »
- More strategies.»
- To put marks for all team works, not only for the final case»
- More lectures by Lars would be good. Boo Edgars lectures did not feel very relevant, it was too much about biotech.»
- The lecturers from the industry. They have too much expertise, it is not needed for us that just should learn the basics. Hard to listen in 4 hours then... »

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.71

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.71
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.67

Kursutvärderingssystem från