ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TKITE 1112-3 Human-Computer Interaction, TDA289

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-06 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 35%
Around 20 hours/week»10 58%
Around 25 hours/week»1 5%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

- The last week was way too much. The last assignment had a too short time limit.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»7 41%
100%»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 4.58

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 29%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 29%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 2.82

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»2 14%
To some extent»4 28%
Yes, definitely»8 57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I like the fact that there is a main task rather than an examination» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»3 17%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»8 47%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- None» (Small extent)
- Föreläsningarna kändes ofta irrelevanta.» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»5 29%
Some extent»8 47%
Large extent»4 23%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- Didn"t read anything» (Small extent)
- Didn"t buy the book.» (Small extent)
- Inte läst speciellt mycket alls.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»1 5%
Rather badly»5 29%
Rather well»8 47%
Very well»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- Extremely badly, assignments were posted too late and submission was not possible until the last few days of the deadline. Some information were lacking.» (Very badly)
- Ping pong sucks!» (Rather badly)
- Kaos i början, sen blev det bättre.» (Rather badly)
- Good job Dimi» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»2 11%
Very good»13 76%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 17%
Very well»14 82%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

11. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»13 76%
High»2 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Förutom i slutet då det helt plötsligt var tre grejer samtidigt, det var inte så bra upplägg..» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 11%
Adequate»7 41%
High»5 29%
Too high»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- 50 h weeks suck.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»3 17%
Fair»2 11%
Adequate»2 11%
Good»8 47%
Excellent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.23 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Probable the worst course I"ve attended to during my studies.» (Poor)
- Tyvärr. Lärde mig inte så mycket som jag hoppats. » (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The assignments»
- Nothing.»
- The assignment and the main task»
- Bra med inlämningsuppgifter.»
- Some of the weekly assignments were better than others but some of them should be skipped so the student can focus on the main task.»
- The assignments, it was nice to have assignments all the way throw giving you a chance to do things right away after learning them»
- I really liked the lectures, good diversity of small exercise, real life examples and regular lecture talk»
- Dimitrious»
- assignment»
- Doing assignments is the single best method of learning. The assignments should be preserved, but enhanced. Dimitri was an awesome teacher. He was engaging, knowledgeable and put a lot of effort into helping the students. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- No compulsory attendance. Main task need some real guidelines. The lectures were of no real value. It seemed as no one learned anything from the lectures and the assignments. Needs more technical detail and analysis. »
- Föreläsningar mer givande, inte bara massa diskussioner som inte leder nånstans, tydligare var kursen egentligen går ut på, inte flera inlämningar det sista när man redan har mycket att göra.»
- Giving us only 5 days without warning on the individual report was a bit annoying.»
- I the assignment should not be changed during the time, and maybe a little less things to do the last week.»
- Last assignment»
- presentation on main task»
- The Hierarchical Task Analysis assignment felt pointless. Fang Chens lectures felt unfocused. She should read up on gender theory and HBTQ rights. The incident when she ridiculed transgender persons was awful. My learning suffered because Fang Chens English skills are poor. I just had to spend too much energy on trying to understand what she was trying to say. The assistant teacher for the assignments had no social skills and did little or no assisting. The guest lecture by SpotFire was incredibly bad. The presentation had little relevance, the product seemed to have a mediocre UX and the presenter was unengaging. The guest lectures by Morten were fairly good but it was clear that the communication between him and the other teachers was lacking. He seemed totally surprised by the fact that he was expected to explain HTA, and ended up doing it hastily and with little or no enthusiasm. »

16. Additional comments

- I learned absolutely nothing from this course.»
- The lectures were good but the questions asked were quite hard, to ask for spontaneous opinions was maybe a bit ambitious?»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.23
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.23
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.55

Kursutvärderingssystem från