ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

KBT167 - Applied Nuclear Chemistry 2011

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-01-24 - 2012-02-06
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Stefan Allard»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

1. Lectures: Difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the lectures in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

15 svarande

1»2 13%
2»2 13%
3»9 60%
4»1 6%
5»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Nice hands-down information.» (1)
- The lever was very low, I expected something more and more information about the different subjects.» (2)
- Material easy, listeneing to the lecturer impossible,» (5)

2. Lectures: Interesting

Please grade how interesting the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

15 svarande

1»2 13%
2»2 13%
3»5 33%
4»3 20%
5»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Never went after first one.» (1)
- The subjects are very interesting and relevant» (5)

3. Lectures: Relevance

Please grade how relevant the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

15 svarande

1»2 13%
2»0 0%
3»2 13%
4»9 60%
5»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- it was impossible to understand anything because the sentences were not fluent enough» (1)
- Never went after first one.» (1)

4. Lectures: Handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 6%
3»4 26%
4»5 33%
5»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

5. Lectures: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»0 0%
3»6 40%
4»6 40%
5»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.53 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- we got enough time of questions, but we could not understand the answers so it was not so interesting to ask questions» (1)
- No problems whatsoever to get in touch with tutorial leaders and Gunnar S. for asking questions.» (5)

6. Lectures: Number of lectures

Would you have liked more lectures to cover the course?

15 svarande

Yes»3 20%
No»12 80%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

7. Lecturer: Prof. Gunnar Skarnemark

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

15 svarande

1»3 20%
2»3 20%
3»5 33%
4»2 13%
5»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Feels a bit bad to give this grade. He has a outstanding knowledge, but the stuttering makes it hard to find the point in going to the lectures. » (1)
- the slides are ok, but it is really hard to follow, and also we lose a lot of time because of the scattering» (1)
- Is there any other choice than 1? It"s a joke, a bad one. "UNDER ALL KRITIK". The man should not be lecturing, something has to be done. No one gets anything out of it. It"s undermining the students learning, it"s disrespectful to put him on to lecture when he can"t speak, to both himself and the students. » (1)
- He knows a whole lot but unfortunately he has to speak in english in this course and that is really a big problem for him. He doesn"t really get the information across. In order to keep a high level on the education one would probably have to replace him next year. You also have to consider that people from outside the EU does pay for their education and they expect a lecturer that they can understand.» (2)
- Very knowledgable and kind but serious problems in communicating due to his studdering.» (2)
- Hard to understand him» (2)
- Knows alot, but sometimes difficulties with teaching.» (3)
- He is very good but unfortunately his problem to speak is disturbing.» (3)
- Gunnar S. is a really nice person with lots of knowledge in his field, if he didn"t know the answer for a question he sure came up with one the next lecture. I didn"t have any issues with Gunnars" stuttering but if he wants, he can write on the blackboard.» (5)

8. Home exercise - MALRAD: understanding

Please indicate how the home exercise - MALRAD - has increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»4 26%
3»1 6%
4»8 53%
5»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.26 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The main problem is that there is no information about gamma-spectrometry in the book, handouts or lab syllabuses. A five-minute walkthrough is not enough to master this important instrument. I request a "manual" that describes the instrument, how it is used and waht one should look for on the computer screen etc....» (2)

9. Home exercise - MALRAD: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the home exercise - MALRAD - has been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

15 svarande

1»2 13%
2»2 13%
3»0 0%
4»7 46%
5»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is releevant but look on the information section in the above question.» (5)

10. Home exercise - MALRAD: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the home exercise - MALRAD - has been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»2 13%
3»2 13%
4»4 26%
5»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. Home exercise - MALRAD: difficulty

Please grade the home exercise - MALRAD - with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»5 33%
3»6 40%
4»3 20%
5»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- we didn"t really know what to do» (4)

12. Laboratory exercises: understanding

Please indicate how the labs have increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

15 svarande

1»2 13%
2»1 6%
3»2 13%
4»5 33%
5»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Pretty much the same kind of labs from the previous course.» (1)
- The labs are really good, but since we have had so many labs during that semester they all kind of blur into each other and a lot of information is lost» (3)

13. Laboratory exercises: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the labs have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»1 6%
3»2 13%
4»8 53%
5»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. Laboratory exercises: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the labs have been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

15 svarande

1»2 13%
2»0 0%
3»3 20%
4»5 33%
5»5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»1 6%
3»1 6%
4»6 40%
5»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- General steps in PUREX process was interesting.» (5)

16. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»2 13%
3»5 33%
4»6 40%
5»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.26 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- can"t remember wich one was difficult or not... too long ago» (3)

17. Laboratory exercises: Separation of Plutonium and Americium - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic. Eng. Hanna Hedström, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»0 0%
3»1 6%
4»5 33%
5»8 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.26 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- She is a nice person underneath the hard attitude.» (5)

18. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using α,-spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»2 13%
2»0 0%
3»2 13%
4»7 46%
5»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

19. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using α,-spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»0 0%
3»5 33%
4»6 40%
5»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- can"t remember wich one was difficult or not... too long ago» (3)
- The calculation in the lab report was difficult.» (5)

20. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of a plutonium sample using α,-spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic. Eng. Emma Aneheim, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»4 26%
4»7 46%
5»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Arvid was really good and seemed to have a passion to teach.» (3)
- She is very nice and takes time to answer questions.» (5)

21. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of plutonium samples using mass spectrometry - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»1 6%
3»3 20%
4»7 46%
5»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very important lab since this is the only time a K student comes in touch with a MS in general» (5)

22. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of plutonium samples using mass spectrometry - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»4 26%
3»5 33%
4»5 33%
5»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- can"t remember wich one was difficult or not... too long ago» (3)

23. Laboratory exercises: Determination of the isotopic composition of plutonium samples using mass spectrometry - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Ph.D. Arvid Ödegaard-Jensen, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 6%
3»1 6%
4»7 46%
5»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- He is nice and should be tutorial leader in the Nuclear Chemistry course (KBT191)» (5)

24. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»1 6%
3»2 13%
4»8 53%
5»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

25. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 13%
3»6 40%
4»5 33%
5»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- can"t remember wich one was difficult or not... too long ago» (3)

26. Laboratory exercises: Age determination of a 233-U sample and determination of its 232-U contents - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Ph.D. Stellan Holgersson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 6%
3»4 26%
4»8 53%
5»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- He isn"t the fastest one with email responses but is ok.» (4)

27. Calculation exercises: relevance

Please grade how relevant the calculation exercises in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»3 20%
4»9 60%
5»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

28. Calculation exercises: difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the calculation exercises in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»3 20%
3»10 66%
4»2 13%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

29. Calculation exercises: handouts

Have the handouts been good? Please grade them with 1 being "very bad" and 5 "very good".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»7 46%
4»5 33%
5»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

30. Calculation exercises: number of occasions

Would you have liked more calculation exercises to cover the course?

15 svarande

Yes»7 46%
No»8 53%

Genomsnitt: 1.53

31. Calculation exercises: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 6%
3»4 26%
4»6 40%
5»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

32. Calculation exercises: Supervisors

Please grade the supervisor M.Sc. Lovisa Bauhn, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 13%
3»5 33%
4»4 26%
5»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

33. Calculation exercises: Supervisors

Please grade the supervisor M.Sc. Marcus Hedberg, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»2 13%
2»4 26%
3»3 20%
4»4 26%
5»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Write more clever on the bord, so that everyone will have time to write everthing. And you wont need to clean the bord after every scentence.» (3)
- His technic of writing and cleaning the board is not good. Needs better structure.» (3)

34. General: Workload

Please indicate how you perceive the 7.5 hp workload, with 1 being "very low" and 5 "very high".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»2 13%
3»8 53%
4»4 26%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Too many labs» (4)

35. General: Textbook

Please grade the book "Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry", with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»4 26%
2»1 6%
3»3 20%
4»6 40%
5»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- For the previous course it sucks donkey dick but for this course it is excellent.» (1)
- useless for this course» (1)
- too expensive» (4)

36. General: Administration

Please grade the course administration in general, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 6%
3»5 33%
4»6 40%
5»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

37. General: Information

Please indicate how well course information was provided, with 1 being "terribly" and 5 "excellently".

15 svarande

1»1 6%
2»0 0%
3»5 33%
4»5 33%
5»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The lecturing brings it down to a 1, only beacuse it"s the lowest grade avaiable. And way to many labs during that period.» (1)

38. Exam

Please indicate how well the exam reflected the course, with 1 being "poorly" and 5 "very well".

15 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 6%
3»4 26%
4»6 40%
5»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.57

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.57
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.64

Kursutvärderingssystem från