ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Mechanical Performance of Engineering Materials 2011, MTT100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-05 - 2011-12-23
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 59%
Kontaktperson: Johan Ahlström»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 4 30%

Around 20 hours/week» 6 46%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 15%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 1 7%

75%» 4 30%

100%» 8 61%

Genomsnitt: 4.53

- I missed some of the exercises, but this was my fault.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 0 0%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 8 61%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- There is a small confusion here because ther is a slight overlap with the other course of this term. Maybe a more clear seperation of some part of the goals would be more helpful.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 13 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 3 23%

Yes, definitely» 4 30%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- It was extremely had to see what type of exam was coming up. I really thought the exam was really hard as there wasn"t enough support for studying (exercises, pre exam questions etc). I think the sample exam and the real exam had a big span in between. » (To some extent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.38

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures (by Johan) been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 3 23%

Large extent» 7 53%

Great extent» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I prefer having more mixture in the writing with not only text - the notes are "useless" when writing them down without the relevant figures. Maybe the writing should be in a format that fits the printable version of the power point?» (Some extent)
- Lecture slides was a bit to complex. Writing om the blackboard helped more.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the tutorials (by Emmy) been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent» 3 23%

Some extent» 3 23%

Large extent» 6 46%

Great extent» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- Too fast, no relevance between what to know and what to find in books etc. I would have preferred SOLUTIONS on the web so that you can exercise on your own. Even it you say it is better, I never never do exercises if there is no answers. » (Small extent)
- She is going too fast, to do all the exercises for the lecture. Maybe she should select a little bit less exercises and explain them better than going so fast.» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the laboratory session on monotonic deformation (by Seshendra) been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent» 1 7%

Some extent» 3 23%

Large extent» 6 46%

Great extent» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

9. To what extent has the laboratory session on cyclic deformation (by Krste) been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 15%

Large extent» 7 53%

Great extent» 4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Krste is really good in explaining!» (Large extent)

10. To what extent has the teaching as a whole been of help for your learning?

Please comment on how well the lectures, tutorials and lab sessions matched and complemented each other.

- I think it is better to not include different concepts from different sources. Especially in the Creep and Fatigue. I got stuck and complicated while was reading the texts.»
- It has been quite helpful»
- I think it was good with a correct structure. Lectures then tutorials after each chapter on the lecture and the labs covered the 2 major topics,tensile and fatigue testing. Overall it was very good.»
- There was a good flow in the course. Theory of lab sessions and exercises was taught in lectures before the lab sessions and exercises.»
- Overall everything worked out fine.»
- Lectures was good, especially with the summary. This was good for further studies. Emmys lectures has potential. Some solutions sometimes had too many jump in equations etc. For example, one exercise, seeming very hard, was in reality easy one I worked on it myself... Lab sessions was relevant to course. Krste is very good.»
- They matched each other very well.»

11. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 3 25%

Large extent» 7 58%

Great extent» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- Well, that is what the course is based on. » (Large extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 2 15%

Rather well» 6 46%

Very well» 5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- exercises with answers would have been needed, early to start studying earlier. I also would have liked some questions correlating to each lecture that you can do as a help when reading the literature. » (Rather badly)
- Handouts was a bit slow.» (Rather badly)
- Everything was explained clearly by Johan. Maybe one thing missing was the grades in opposition to percents aquired on the exam, but this was not problem, just maybe as the suggestion for the next year ,)» (Very well)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 3 23%

Very good» 9 69%

I did not seek help» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 7%

Rather well» 3 23%

Very well» 9 69%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

15. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 8%

Adequate» 9 75%

High» 1 8%

Too high» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Case study was interesting. The concept of just making a presentation is good. A whole project with report as well is really time consuming. This was perfect. One still has to know the subject to be able to give a smooth presentation.» (Low)
- The project made a lot of things fall behind. With one project in each course the workload gets a bit to high.» (Too high)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 7 53%

High» 6 46%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- but I have 3 courses...» (High)
- In combination with the Failure course, this period have been very good. Since the topic of the both is similar, studying have been easier, even though the load have been high all through the period. The MPEM course seem a lot smaller though...» (High)

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 3 23%

Adequate» 1 7%

Good» 6 46%

Excellent» 3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the lab sessions»
- The lab sessions. Good to give extra notes on the blackboard. »
- The labs where okay.»
- Formulas given at exam. There is NO need to learn all those formulas by heart. Krste. He"s so cool. »
- The lab sessions because they give us to see what will really happen in those testing. »

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Well, it"s nobody"s fault of course, but it would be nice thing to see exams from previous years. As this is 1st time of this course, it"s obvious we cannot get ones! :P hopefully we will not face too big surprises during the exam (which is still ahead as for today)»
- The material taught by Ms. Emmy should be put up on the homepage as too much time is wasted in copying from the board in the little time we have»
- The case study could be graded and add a small bonus to the exam grade»
- Better exercises. Answers to tutorial problems on web and for the questions that you work on yourself with»
- Consider removing the project and dont put a whole lecture for introduction. »
- Monotonic Deformation lab Don"t tell students what a nanometer is. ,) Every engineer MUST know what it is.»
- Maybe less writing but more descriptions on the critical points during the lecture time.»

20. Additional comments

- Thank you Johan, Emmy, Krste and Seshendra for great lectures and your huge engagement in teaching process. This only indicates you are really professional team! Thank you once again!»
- Very good lectures, especially for the first time.»
- The formulas and equations to learn for the exams should be up at the begging of the course so students won"t be wondering about this issue when they attend the tutorials and try to figure out what they need to memorize and what not.»
- Merry christmas!»
- Atmosphere have been pleasant!»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.38
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.79

Kursutvärderingssystem från