ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Global Chemical Sustainability 2011, KBT140

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-11-06 - 2011-11-20
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Magdalena Svanström»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 40%
Around 20 hours/week»1 10%
Around 25 hours/week»3 30%
Around 30 hours/week»2 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- A lot of this time was optional tasks.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- In my opinion there are too much lecture-hours, if you also need to do a project and if you have to write essays and so on. The projectmeetings costed me at least 8 hours per week and thereby, this was not my only course.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 30%
100%»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.7

- A lot of the teachings were interesting, but afterwards I mostly didn"t have the idea that I really learned something new, while it costs a lot of time per week.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

According to the course syllabus: After successfully completing the course, the students should be able to:
•, Describe the function and state of the natural systems in the world
•, Explain how the human society, in particular chemical and chemical engineering industry, affects and depends on natural systems
•, Describe international and regional work on environment and sustainable development on governmental and non-governmental level
•, Identify appropriate tools and strategies for sustainable development in society, in particular industry
•, Analyze sectors of society, in particular chemical and chemical engineering industry, and formulate appropriate strategies for sustainable development
•, Describe the importance of including different stakeholders and perspectives in discussions on sustainable technology development

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 88%
No, the goals are set too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- If you choose to do the minimum in the course the time spend on the course will be extremely low. » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination (i.e. the combination of bonus point activities and written exam) assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 60%
Yes, definitely»4 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- The examination is extremely divided because of all different semi-obligatory moments. I think more moments should be mandatory and that the written exam should give the possibility to give higher grades than a 3. The written examination do not reflect the course idea, the course is based on discussions not specific knowledge as the exam was.» (To some extent)
- Yes. But som questions required to much detail knowledge. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»3 30%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Mostly the powerpoint slides were really important because of the facts which were written in there, but the teachings itself were a really small extent.» (Small extent)
- Good lectures and excercises!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- The paper given on lectures are important. The book is extremely good to read, but the has actually nothing to do with the examination. Reading the book do not give you any extra knowledge for the examination.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The studentportal is working really slow and sometimes after logging in it"s not working.» (Very well)

Teaching and learning activities

9. How useful were the lectures by Magdalena Svanström in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Magdalena Svanström»

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 10%
Could have been better»1 10%
Quite useful»3 30%
Very useful»5 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

10. How useful was the lecture by Greg Peters in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Övriga»

10 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»2 40%
Very useful»3 60%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 3.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Do not remember the names of the lecturers!! Might be better to ask about the name of the lecture in a case like this...» (No opinion)
- Too much important exercises at one time: essay, project work, stakeholder analysis and reading the book to prepare yourself.» (No opinion)

11. How useful was the lecture by Kristin Fransson in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Övriga»

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 20%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»4 80%
Very useful»0 0%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 2.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much important exercises at one time: essay, project work, stakeholder analysis and reading the book to prepare yourself.» (No opinion)

12. How useful was the lecture by Gustav Sandin in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Övriga»

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 11%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»6 66%
Very useful»2 22%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. How useful was the lecture by Rickard Arvidsson in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Övriga»

10 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»2 25%
Quite useful»4 50%
Very useful»2 25%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much important exercises at one time: essay, project work, stakeholder analysis and reading the book to prepare yourself.» (No opinion)

14. How useful was the lecture by Morgan Fröling in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Morgan Fröling»

10 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»1 14%
Quite useful»4 57%
Very useful»2 28%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 3.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much important exercises at one time: essay, project work, stakeholder analysis and reading the book to prepare yourself.» (No opinion)

15. How useful was the lecture by Hans Theliander in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Hans Theliander»

10 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»1 14%
Quite useful»5 71%
Very useful»1 14%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much important exercises at one time: essay, project work, stakeholder analysis and reading the book to prepare yourself.» (No opinion)

16. How useful was the lecture by Thomas Hjertberg in your learning?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Thomas Hjertberg»

10 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»3 50%
Very useful»3 50%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much important exercises at one time: essay, project work, stakeholder analysis and reading the book to prepare yourself.» (No opinion)

17. How useful was the lecture by Christer Ågren from the Secretariat of Acid Rain in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»6 85%
Very useful»1 14%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 3.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much important exercises at one time: essay, project work, stakeholder analysis and reading the book to prepare yourself.» (No opinion)

18. How useful was the lecture by Jerker Ligthart from the Chemicals Secretariat in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Could have been better»1 12%
Quite useful»4 50%
Very useful»3 37%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

19. How useful were the class discussions on prereading material on some lectures in your learning

10 svarande

Not useful at all»2 28%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»4 57%
Very useful»1 14%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 2.57 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. How useful was the exercise on "Urgent issues" in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»3 30%
Could have been better»1 10%
Quite useful»4 40%
Very useful»2 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

21. How useful was the exercise on "Basic concepts" in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 12%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»1 12%
Very useful»6 75%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. How useful was the exercise on "Multicriteria analysis" in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 10%
Could have been better»2 20%
Quite useful»3 30%
Very useful»4 40%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much to consider in too little time.» (Could have been better)

23. How useful was the Preknowledge test in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»2 20%
Could have been better»2 20%
Quite useful»3 30%
Very useful»3 30%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

24. How useful was the Al Gore Movie (including discussion) in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»3 33%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»4 44%
Very useful»2 22%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I already seen it but it is still a very good movie!» (Not useful at all)
- And fun» (Very useful)

25. How useful was the Submission Movie (including discussion) in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 16%
Could have been better»1 16%
Quite useful»3 50%
Very useful»1 16%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 2.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

26. How useful was the work in the big Project in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 10%
Could have been better»2 20%
Quite useful»2 20%
Very useful»5 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Should be mandatory for all» (Very useful)

27. How useful was the Museum Visit in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»2 22%
Could have been better»2 22%
Quite useful»4 44%
Very useful»1 11%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.44 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

28. How useful was the Sustainability Seminar in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 12%
Could have been better»2 25%
Quite useful»3 37%
Very useful»2 25%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A huge assignment considered the points given.» (Could have been better)

29. How useful was the Stakeholder dialogue (analysis+dialogue) in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 11%
Could have been better»2 22%
Quite useful»4 44%
Very useful»2 22%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

30. How useful was the individual Bonus activity in your learning?

10 svarande

Not useful at all»1 33%
Could have been better»0 0%
Quite useful»2 66%
Very useful»0 0%
No opinion»7

Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.92

Study climate

31. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»4 40%
I did not seek help»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

32. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Rather well»3 30%
Very well»6 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Very hard to work in such big groups as we had in the project» (Rather poorly)
- very good with some, and very bad with others.» (Rather well)

33. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»1 10%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»3 30%
High»3 30%
Too high»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Too much important exercises at one time: essay, project work, stakeholder analysis and reading the book to prepare yourself.» (Too high)

34. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»3 30%
High»4 40%
Too high»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Summarizing questions

35. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»2 20%
Fair»1 10%
Adequate»1 10%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- I think is hard but nessesary to give this kind of to tech students but this course did it very well!» (Excellent)

36. Do you think that the examination form with the bonus system in this course is good?

10 svarande

No, this should be changed»2 20%
It can be improved»1 10%
The system is OK»2 20%
The system is excellent»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- If you have other classes to attend aswell it can be very hard to attend the bonus activities. This can result in ~80% on the written exam but still only a grade 3 which isn"t fair.» (No, this should be changed)
- maby the amount of bonus should be cheked since it seemed that some things were a lot of work for few points and some things were very litte work/time spent for more points» (The system is OK)

37. Did the course improve your ability to change perspectives?

In the course introduction, it was explained that the diversity among the students was to be used in different exercises in order to improve your ability to understand different perspectives related to time, geographical conditions, cultures and disciplines.

10 svarande

No, it did not!»2 20%
To a minor extent it did»1 10%
Yes, in some ways»2 20%
Yes, it absolutely did!»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

38. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- All different lecturers.»
- The optional tasks. It was very good to be able to choose to do or not to do the bonus exercises, also you are more motivated if you choose to do it by your self than if you have to.»
- A much lower workload (less excersises or less teachings), make the teachings more clear what is really important for the exam don"t ask so much facts in the exam, in that case I would have studied history»

39. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The bonus activities. You should be able to get a higher grade from doing the exam alone. I don"t really think that movies and museum visits should make you get a higher grade.»
- The schedule which lecture includes which pages in the chapter, the pre-knowledge test»

40. Additional comments

- Thanks for a great course =)»
- Sara needs more experiences in giving a presentation (basis concept exercise and MCA lecture).»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.93
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.64

Kursutvärderingssystem från