ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Kursutvärdering Polymer processing and properties, MTT090

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-10 - 2011-11-02
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 15%
Kontaktperson: Mikael Rigdahl»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 27%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»3 27%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- The way of teaching,using slides instead of power point is perfect,we have the time to understand what it is saying and ask question if we want to.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 18%
100%»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 4.81

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 36%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 18%
Yes, definitely»3 27%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»1 9%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- some delay in the rheology-lab handout made it impossible to read in on the lab before attending it...» (Rather well)
- we didn"t get the rheology presentation though...the question about the rod "climbing" effect was mentioned in it and there wasn"t much about it in the handout» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»10 90%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 60%
High»4 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»8 72%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- TTS it changed my overall perspective of the course. Because i refereed a lot,knowing things from different angle,that i have never done that before.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Same way of teaching,and the oral presentation was awesome,the subjects were very interesting and i really enjoyed my time working on that.»
- The content should be the same one.»
- nothing to complain»
- The course has a good composition of both practicall and theoretical aspects. Good to have direct applications on the theory in the entire course...»
- The guest lectures»
- The guest lecturer parts.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Nothing!»
- Improve laboratory sessions so everyone could do something "practical" not just sit and listen»
- we had only one activity that"s TTS,Only after doing that i realized that we should have more group activities,like solving problems in group,Topics to debate in a group,Latest trend in Industrial applications etc.»
- Improve the part about polymer processing»
- have a formulla sheet that is handed out on the examination insteas of making us learn formullas by heart. One cant pass the examn if they dont understand what the course is about anyway. Learning formullas by heart doesnt contribute to anything...»
- Maybe the TTS could be a personal assignment and the best 5 or 10 be presented..»
- More guest lectures from industry to relate course work to industry»
- Applications, practical things»

16. Additional comments

- Overall the course content is good.Since it is entirely a new topic to learn,such activities other than lectures, will thrive us to know the subject in a deeper & broader perspective.»
- nothing»
- Greater focus on applications in various fields required»
- I think teachers should tell us more about the really critical points, both for the theories and in a real application.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från