ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Combustion engineering, MEN031

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-10-10 - 2011-10-30
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 44%
100%»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- missed two classes due to company visits in my second course» (100%)

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 11%
Around 20 hours/week»2 22%
Around 25 hours/week»1 11%
Around 30 hours/week»4 44%
At least 35 hours/week»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

3. Do you consider that you had sufficient knowledge to read this course?

9 svarande

Yes, absolutely»4 44%
In part, but I struggled in places»4 44%
No»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

4. How understandable were the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals gave some guidance, but could be more clear»5 55%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 62%
No, the goals are set too high»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 50%
Yes, definitely»4 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Teaching methods

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

8. To what extent has the the course literature been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»6 66%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

9. Did you find powerpoint presentations to be helpful?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»6 66%
Large extent»2 22%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- could be clearer» (Some extent)

10. What was your overall impression ot the lectures?

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»7 77%
Moderate»2 22%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

11. What was your overall impression of assignments 1-5?

9 svarande

Excellent»1 11%
Good»8 88%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

12. What was your overall impression of assignments 6?

9 svarande

Very interesting»6 66%
Fairly interesting»3 33%
Not interesting»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

13. How well did the course administration and homepage work?

9 svarande

Excellent»5 55%
Good»4 44%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.44

Teaching staff and guest lectures

14. Please rate lectures by Henrik Thunman

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»8 88%
Moderate»1 11%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

15. Please rate lectures by Martin Seemans

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»9 100%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

16. Please rate lectures by Bo Leckner

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»6 66%
Moderate»3 33%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

17. Please rate lectures by Sven Andersson

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»8 88%
Moderate»1 11%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

18. Please rate lectures by Anders Lyngfelt

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»9 100%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

19. Please rate lectures by Lars-Erik Eriksson

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»8 88%
Moderate»1 11%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

20. Please rate lectures by Åsa Burman

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»7 77%
Moderate»2 22%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

21. Please rate lectures by Margareta Lundberg

9 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Good»9 100%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

22. Please rate assignment leader Sadegh Seddighi Khavidak

9 svarande

Excellent»1 11%
Good»4 44%
Moderate»4 44%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- It was not quite clear from the beginning what was involved in the task and presentation, and sometimes I got a bit confused.» (Moderate)

23. Please rate assignment leader Fredrik Lind

9 svarande

Excellent»2 22%
Good»7 77%
Moderate»0 0%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

24. Please rate Sture Wingård (demonstration)

8 svarande

Excellent»2 25%
Good»5 62%
Moderate»1 12%
Poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- It was fun but a bit too long.» (Good)

Study climate

25. What did you think about the work load for the assignments?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 55%
High»2 22%
Too high»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

26. What did you think about the overall work load in the course?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 44%
High»4 44%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- It sure was a lot to read, since details were important.» (High)

27. How was the work load this tudy period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»2 22%
High»3 33%
Too high»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- too many hours overlapped: it meant that I had to recover several lectures in this period.» (Too high)
- I was taking 3 courses, so I have to say that it was too high.» (Too high)

28. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

29. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 11%
Very well»8 88%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

Summarizing questions

30. What is your overall impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Good»7 77%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

31. What improvements can be made to next year?

- It would have been nie to have a study visit outside of Chalmers. I would have liked to see more exercises done during the classes and less work done at home.»
- Dont miss the oxy-fuel combustion chapter!»
- some details should be remarked during classes»
- The groups for Assignment 6 were too big, it would be perfectly possible for a group of two to solve that assignment.»

32. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignment 6 because it was very interesting»
- Assignment are really good way to have practical understanding of the course. Particularely assignment 6.»
- assignments»
- The demonstration, the assignments.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från