|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Game Theory & Rationality 2011Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2011-05-31 - 2011-08-31 Antal svar: 7 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Kristian Lindgren» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Teaching and the course organization1. To what extent have Kristian"s lectures been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - The lectures were good, but in my view there were too few of them to talk about some real learning.» (Some extent) 2. Do you think that the articles helped your understanding of the subject?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - The articles and subsequent discussions were of the major information sources for me.» (Yes, very much) 3. Did you find the mix of Kristian"s lectures, the student held seminars, the group projects and the guest lectures suitable?Please comment on what you would like to have more or less of (if you would like to shift the emphasis)!6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - I wouldn"t mind more but shorter teacher-led seminars.» (Some extent) 4. How was the learning experience of preparing and holding a student lead seminar?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - I really like the idea of the student-led seminar, but I think we could"ve chosen the better topic for ours. I think we didn"t spend enough time on preparation. In my view it might be better if we had a system similar to Martin Nilson Jacobi"s one - with submission of the presentation a week in advance.» (Not very rewarding) 5. Which quarter(s) would you like the course to be in?We are planing on moving the course to the autumn.6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - Frankly speaking, I don"t really care too much. It is not the most time-consuming subject, therefore having it in Spring seems like a good idea to me.» ((Quarter 4 (as it was))) 6. When would you prefer to have the major workload?This was something that came up during our discussions in Linsen after friday"s presentations.7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 7. How well did the course administration, communication etc. work?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - Pingpong might be a bit like Lunarstorm, but at least the server is up most of the time ,)» (Rather well) Guest lectures and student lead seminarsChoose the "Did not attend"-option for seminars you did not attend.8. How do you rate Thomas Sterner"s lecture?On the tradegy of the commons etc.7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - Could have been a bit more focused on the connections to game theory, but very interesting.» (Good) 9. How do you rate Philip Gerlee"s lecture?About the waiting game (or war of attrition) in a spatial setting.7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - It was educational to learn about the waiting game, but in my view the simulation in 2D is not relevant to any of the real-world phenomena that I know about, or maybe Philip was not very clear about the applications.» (Not so good) 10. How do you rate Olof Johansson-Stenman"s lecture?Behavourial economics (last lecture)7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - It was very interesting and exciting, but I"m afraid a little bit kind of obvious...» (Not so good) 11. How do you rate student held seminar on altruism?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - The topic was interesting, and the articles were chosen carefully. This is one of the few seminars I remember quite clearly.» (Very good) 12. How do you rate student held seminar on the cooperative games and the airport problem?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 13. How do you rate student held seminar on asymmetric information?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 14. How do you rate student held seminar on bounded rationality?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.2 15. How do you rate student held seminar on Counterfactual reasoning and rationality?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - Frankly speaking, I didn"t understand the whole topic clearly enough.» (Not so good) Your own effort16. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?Hours per week include time in lectures, reading the course literature, working with home problems etc.7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.57 - Some 2 hours to read literature before the seminar every week + about 3 full days to prepare for our own one + about 1 week to complete the project.» (At most 15 hours) 17. How did you prioritize this course in comparison to the parallell courses7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Had a very skew workload distribution this quarter. (Not your fault)» (Equal) Study climate18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help during the course?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 19. How was the course workload?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - The workload was adequate, but it was possible to pass the course quite successfully without preparing really well.» (Low) Course goals, level of difficulty, examination20. What were your impression of the course goals?Note that some goals of the course was described in the first lecture, but that some were up to us as students to create/set.7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Didn"t really think about them after they were presented the first time.» (The goals gave some guidance, but could have been clearer) 21. Is the level of difficulty of the course reasonable, considering your background and the number of credits?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.57 - It"s not so difficult, but difficulty shouldn"t be a goal in itself.» (No, the level is too low) 22. Did the examination as a whole assess whether you have reached the goals?The course was examined in four parts:Participating actively Holding a seminar Project presentation Project report 7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.85 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I have a feeling the course goal was a rather introspective process, so not so easy to assess. A simulation project is fun and all, but the deeper issue of rationality was not touched on so much after the introduction.» (Yes, to some extent) 23. How do you rate the algorithm competition assignment and lecture?The iterated prisoners dilemma in mathematica =)7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.28 - It was interesting and joyful for me. Now I feel like a pro in iterated prisoner"s dilemma :)» (Good) Summarizing questions24. What is your general impression of the course?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - Kristian is a very good teacher and it is a fun and interesting subject.» (Good) 25. Is there anything you think should be changed until next year?- It was very difficult to find a thread in the course to follow. This would have been easier with lectures held by Kristian for example, making the whole thing alot more well defined and mathematical. For example: it took a while to figure out how to actually calculate the nash equilibrium of a game, and it could easily had been covered in one of say 5 introductory lectures with better structure. Also it was difficult to gauge the relevance and what level the student lead seminars were on. It might be that altruism is a seldom used, extremely advanced concept in game theory, it could also be very basic, but I dont know if it is or not. This is a problem. With the course as it is now there is no well defined beginning or end, and it is very difficult to know where to look for more information and where to continue ones studies after the course. »- Maybe some more mandatory guidance on the projects. » - It was a great course, but I think it would be even better if the home problems were checking the understanding of the GT concepts in more detail (maybe something like 3-4 short Mathematica-algorithm kind of home problems). I didn"t really like the second home problem, for me it was more of the copy-paste work, instead of sober summarizing the material learned.» 26. Additional comments- Considering that it is a zero-budget course, it was performed really well, but it has its weak points, a few of which are brought up in question number 25. »Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.42
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%